Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T03:08:18.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sustained impact of an antibiotic stewardship initiative targeting asymptomatic bacteriuria and pyuria in the emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2022

Mary Catherine CashOpen the ORCID record for Mary Catherine Cash[Opens in a new window],
Garrett Hile,
James Johnson,
Tyler Stone,
Jessica SmithOpen the ORCID record for Jessica Smith[Opens in a new window],
Chris Ohl,
Vera Luther and
James Beardsley
Mary Catherine Cash*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Garrett Hile
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky
James Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North CarolinaSection on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Tyler Stone
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North CarolinaSection on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Jessica Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
Chris Ohl
Affiliation:
Section on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Vera Luther
Affiliation:
Section on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
James Beardsley
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North CarolinaSection on Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
*
Author for correspondence: Mary Catherine Cash, PharmD, Wake Forest Baptist Health, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27517. E-mail: Mccash228@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective:

To determine whether a multifaceted initiative resulted in maintained reduction in inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic pyuria (ASP) or bacteriuria (ASB) in the emergency department (ED).

Design:

Single-center, retrospective study.

Methods:

Beginning in December 2015, a series of interventions were implemented to decrease the inappropriate treatment of ASP or ASB in the ED. Patients discharged from the ED from August to October 2015 (preintervention period), from December 2016 to February 2017 (postintervention period 1), and from November 2019 to January 2020 (postintervention period 2) were included if they had pyuria and/or bacteriuria without urinary symptoms. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics within 72 hours of discharge from the ED. The secondary outcome was the number of patients returning to the ED with symptomatic UTI within 30 days of discharge.

Results:

We detected a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with ASP or ASB who were inappropriately treated when comparing the preintervention group and post-intervention group 1 (100% vs 32.4%; P < .001). This reduced frequency of inappropriate treatment was noted 3 years after the intervention, with 28% of patients receiving treatment for ASP or ASB in postintervention group 2. (P was not significant fin the comparison with postintervention group 1.) Among the 3 groups analyzed, we detected no difference in the numbers of patients returning to the ED with a symptomatic UTI within 30 days of ED discharge regardless of whether patients received antibiotics.

Conclusions:

A multifaceted intervention resulted in a significant decrease in inappropriate use of antibiotics for ASP and/or ASB that was maintained 3 years after implementation.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , 2022, e148
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections in the United States, resulting in an estimated 2 million visits to emergency departments (EDs) each year. 1 Symptoms of UTI include urinary urgency and frequency, suprapubic tenderness, costovertebral angle tenderness, and fever. Transient bacteriuria or colonization may result in asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), defined as the isolation of bacteria from an appropriately collected urine sample in a patient who lacks signs and symptoms of a UTI. Because ASB is not reflective of true infection, current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend against the use of antibiotics to treat ASB except in the case of pregnancy or planned urologic procedure. Reference Nicolle, Gupta and Bradley2 Furthermore, it has been suggested that the use of antibiotics to treat ASB results in potentially avoidable adverse drug events including increased antibiotic resistance, increased rates of Clostridioides difficile infection, and increased rates of recurrent symptomatic UTI. Reference Cai, Mazzoli and Mondaini3–Reference Dull, Friedman and Risoldi5 Despite guideline recommendations against the use of antibiotics and the demonstrated risk of inappropriate antibiotic use, treatment of ASB remains common in clinical practice. Reference Chowdhury, Sarkar and Branche6,Reference Petty, Vaughn and Flanders7

In recent years, initiatives have been made to reduce the overprescribing of antibiotics in asymptomatic patients. Reference Grigoryan, Naik and Horwitz9–Reference Collins, Kabara, Michienzi and Malani19 Many studies have demonstrated an improvement in prescribing practices following educational intervention. Strategies for these interventions ranged from a single 1-hour educational session to the development of algorithms and pocket cards to assist prescribers and nursing staff in decision making. Not only have pharmacist-led educational interventions been shown to decrease the rate of inappropriate treatment of ASB, but some studies have also suggested a cost benefit associated with minimization of unnecessary treatment. Reference Hartley, Kuhn and Valley14,Reference Chowdhury, Sarkar and Branche20

Asymptomatic pyuria (ASP), defined as a urine specimen that contains increased numbers of leukocytes in an otherwise asymptomatic patient, represents the presence of inflammation that is not always due to true infection. However, it also commonly results in the inappropriate initiation of antibiotics. Reference Wise and Schlegel8 Although ASB has gained recognition in recent years for promoting inappropriate antibiotic use, the impact of ASP on prescribing behavior and the impact antimicrobial stewardship initiatives have on those behaviors is not well characterized.

Several studies have demonstrated improvement in prescribing practices immediately following educational interventions, but few have characterized the sustained impact of such antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Similarly, few studies have formally evaluated the influence of ASP on prescribing in the ED or the effects of initiatives to improve such prescribing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the sustained impact of a multifaceted intervention on the rate of inappropriate treatment of ASP or ASB in the ED at our institution.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study was conducted at the Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center (WFBMC) ED. The 45-bed adult ED at WFBMC receives ∼80,000 visits annually. The study was approved by the Wake Forest Baptist Health institutional review board.

Beginning in December 2015, a series of interventions were implemented to decrease the unnecessary treatment of ASB and ASP at the study institution. Interventions included verbal presentations to physicians and pharmacists, distribution of pocket cards and treatment algorithms (Supplementary Fig. 1), alerts embedded into order-entry software addressing the appropriate use of urine cultures (Supplementary Fig. 2), and elimination of reflex urine-culture orders for positive urinalyses (Fig. 1). These interventions took place over several months and targeted providers in the ED as well as internal medicine service lines. In November 2016, ED pharmacists assisted with a focused education that targeted practices in the ED. These interventions were implemented in the setting of a well-established antimicrobial stewardship program and 24-hour ED pharmacist coverage. To examine both the immediate and long-term effects of these interventions, the investigators chose a preintervention group that included patients discharged from the ED prior to the implementation of any interventions, a postintervention group 1 that included patients discharged from the ED in the months immediately following the focused education in the ED, and a postintervention group 2 that included patients discharged from the ED 3 years after the focused education.

Fig. 1.

Timeline of intervention in relation to study groups.

Patients who had urine studies completed prior to discharge from the ED were identified using the electronic medical record (EMR) database (Epic Systems, Verona, WI). Results were filtered to identify patients who had urine study results meeting defined study criteria. Identified patients were then retrospectively screened for inclusion. Patients were reviewed consecutively in the chronological order in which they received care until the target sample size in each group was attained.

Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were at least 18 years of age and were discharged from the ED between August and October 2015 (preintervention group), between December 2016 and February 2017 (postintervention group 1), or between November 2019 and January 2020 (postintervention group 2) (Fig. 1). Patients were included if urine studies collected during the ED visit resulted in either a urinalysis with >12 white blood cells per high-power field or a urine culture with ≥100,000 colony-forming units per milliliter. Patients were excluded (1) if they had signs or symptoms of UTI including urinary frequency or urgency, dysuria, suprapubic tenderness, or temperature >100.3°F or 37.9°C according to EMR documentation; (2) if they were pregnant; (3) if they had an indwelling catheter, ureteral stent, or nephrostomy tube; (4) if the had been were diagnosed with another infection requiring treatment with antibiotics; and/or (5) if they were immunocompromised. Immunocompromised status was defined as human immunodeficiency virus with CD4 count < 50 cells/mm3, history of stem-cell or solid-organ transplant, use of prednisone 20 mg equivalent of a glucocorticoid for at least 2 weeks, therapy with any medication used for prevention of organ rejection, or an absolute neutrophil count <1,000 cells/mm3.

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ASP or ASB prescribed antibiotics within 72 hours of ED discharge. The secondary outcome was the number of patients returning to the ED with symptomatic UTI within 30 days of discharge. The preintervention group was compared to postintervention group 1 to determine the intervention’s immediate impact. Postintervention group 1 was compared to postintervention group 2 to determine the sustainability of the initiative.

We used the χ2 or Fisher exact test to analyze categoric data. A sample size calculation predicted that 32 patients in the preintervention group and in postintervention group 1 would provide 80% power at an α of 0.05 to detect a 30% relative reduction in the inappropriate treatment of ASB and ASP. Target sample size was set at 37 patients for each of these groups. The inclusion of 50 patients in postintervention group 2 would provide 80% power at an α of 0.05 to detect an absolute increase of 25% in the proportion of inappropriate prescribing for ASB and/or ASP when compared to postintervention group 1.

Results

In the preintervention group, 167 patients were screened to identify 37 with ASB or ASP for whom antibiotic treatment was not indicated. In the postintervention group 1, 118 patients were screened to identify 37 patients for inclusion. In the postintervention group 2, 187 patients were screened until 50 were included. The most common reasons for exclusion were documented signs or symptoms of UTI, presence of another infection requiring antibiotics, and presence of an indwelling catheter, ureteral stent, or nephrostomy tube (Fig. 2). Baseline characteristics were similar among groups (Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Inclusion and exclusion.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

The intervention resulted in a dramatic reduction in inappropriate prescribing for ASP or ASB from 100% in the preintervention group to 32.4% in postintervention group 1 (P < .001) (Fig. 3). No change in the proportion of inappropriate prescribing was observed 3 years after the intervention, with 28% of patients receiving treatment for ASP and/or ASB in post-intervention group 2. P was not significant in the comparison with postintervention group 1 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Proportion of patients inappropriately treated for ASP and/or ASB.

Among those treated for ASB or ASP in the preintervention group, 25 (68%) were treated based on ASP in the absence of bacteriuria. This inappropriate antibiotic use in response to ASP was reduced in the months immediately following implementation of the intervention: 100% in the preintervention group versus 22% in postintervention group 1 (P < .001) (Table 2). No change in the proportion of inappropriate prescribing for ASP was observed years after the intervention, and 10 patients (21.7%) in postintervention group 2 received treatment. P was not significant in the comparison with postintervention group 1 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Immediate and Sustained Impact of a Multi-faceted Stewardship Initiative

Note. ASP, asymptomatic pyuria; ASB, asymptomatic bacteriuria.

a P < .05 for comparison with preintervention group.

b 3 of 3 had received antibiotics for ASB and/or ASP.

c 2 of 4 had received antibiotics for ASP and/or ASB.

d 1 of 1 had received antibiotics for ASP and/or ASB.

Furthermore, 3 patients in the preintervention group, 4 patients in postintervention group 1, and 1 patient in postintervention group 2 returned to the ED with a symptomatic UTI within 30 days (Table 2). Withholding antibiotics for ASB or ASP did not result in an increased risk of returning with a symptomatic UTI; 2 (3%) of 61 untreated patients and 6 (10%) of 63 treated patients returned with a symptomatic UTI.

Discussion

The multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship initiative resulted in a significant decrease in the inappropriate treatment of ASP or ASB in the ED in the 3 months immediately following its implementation. Furthermore, this reduction was still noted when evaluated 3 years after the initial intervention.

The treatment rate in the preintervention group (100%) was higher than predicted, emphasizing the importance of these interventions. Treatment rates decreased by approximately two-thirds in postintervention group 1, demonstrating an impact from the initiative that was both statistically and clinically significant. No other changes apart from the interventions could be identified as affecting this outcome.

The sustainability of various antibiotic stewardship initiatives has not been well described in the literature. A controlled crossover study evaluating the timing and duration of antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis demonstrated an improvement in appropriate prescribing practices immediately after education. However, such improvements were not sustained over the course of 12 months. Reference Landgren, Harvey, Mashford, Moulds, Guthrie and Hemming21 In contrast, an educational intervention in one nursing home demonstrated a reduction in the submission of inappropriate urine cultures and a reduction in ASB treatment up to 30 months after the intervention. Reference Zabarsky, Sethi and Donskey11

The maintained reduction in inappropriate treatment seen in this study is likely to have been influenced by several factors. First, alerts embedded into order-entry software, and the elimination of reflex urine culture orders implemented as part of the initiative have remained in place since their implementation. Thus, any impact these interventions had immediately following their implementation was likely to be maintained. The antimicrobial stewardship program at the study institution is strong, which helped optimize the utilization of antimicrobial agents across the medical center, including in the ED. Furthermore, 24-hour pharmacist coverage in the ED may have contributed to day-to-day stewardship interventions that minimized inappropriate treatment throughout the study period.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the impact of ASP on the inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in the ED. Most patients meeting study inclusion criteria in all groups had ASP in the absence of confirmed ASB, suggesting that ASP may be a driver of inappropriate antibiotic usage. Although the high rate of ASP alone in the preintervention group was surprising, the rate of ASP in the absence of bacteriuria in the postintervention groups was not unexpected as the elimination of reflex urine cultures for positive urinalyses is suspected to have decreased the number of urine cultures overall. Notably, the sustained decrease in the primary outcome appears to have been driven by a sustained decrease in the treatment of ASP. Despite this, most patients treated for ASP did not have urine cultures obtained, suggesting that prescribers are making a presumptive diagnosis of UTI based only on a nonspecific inflammatory marker.

The number of patients returning to the ED with signs or symptoms of UTI within 30 days of discharge was not significantly different among the 3 study groups. However, most of those who did return to the ED with a symptomatic UTI had received antibiotics for ASP and/or ASB. These results suggest that there is no apparent harm from refraining from treatment of asymptomatic patients.

This study had several limitations. First, it was conducted at a single center and included a relatively small sample size. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, data capture was dependent upon accurate documentation in the medical record. Furthermore, exclusion criteria did not account for those with frequent UTIs or other comorbid conditions that may influence prescribing patterns. Finally, the data presented only represent snapshots of antibiotic utilization at various points over 4.5 years. As such, conclusions cannot be made as to the proportion of inappropriate treatment in the interim periods, and advances in medical trainee knowledge throughout the year may have influenced these results.

In conclusion, a multifaceted stewardship initiative significantly decreased the proportion of inappropriate treatment of ASP or ASB in the ED in the months immediately following the interventions. The decreased proportion of inappropriate treatment of ASP and ASB was preserved when it was evaluated 3 years after the initial intervention.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.289

Acknowledgments

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. These results were presented at IDWeek 2017 on October 4–8, 2017, in San Diego, California, and at IDWeek 2020, on October 21–25, 2020, held virtually.

References

National Center for Health Statistics. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey (NHAMCS), 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Published 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2017_ed_web_tables-508.pdf. Accessed August 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Nicolle, LE, Gupta, K, Bradley, SF, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2019;68(10):e83–e75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, T, Mazzoli, S, Mondaini, N, et al. The role of asymptomatic bacteriuria in young women with recurrent urinary tract infections: to treat or not to treat? Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:771–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, T, Nesi, G, Mazzoli, S, et al. Asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment is associated with higher prevalence of antibiotic resistant strains in women with urinary tract infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:1655–1661.Google ScholarPubMed
Dull, RB, Friedman, SK, Risoldi, ZM, et al. Antimicrobial treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in noncatheterized adults: a systematic review. Pharmacotherpy 2014:34:941–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, F, Sarkar, K, Branche, A, et al. Preventing the inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria at a community teaching hospital J Commun Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2012;2(2). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.V212.17814.Google Scholar
Petty, LA, Vaughn, VM, Flanders, SA, et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179:1519–1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, GJ, Schlegel, PN. Sterile Pyuria. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1048–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigoryan, L, Naik, A, Horwitz, D, et al. Survey finds improvement in cognitive biases that drive overtreatement of asymptomatic bacteriuria after a successful antimicrobial stewardship intervention. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:1544–1548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavese, P, Saurel, N, Labarère, J, et al. Does an educational session with an infectioys diseases physician reduce the use of inappropriate antibiotic therapy for inpatients with positive urine culture results? A controlled before-and-after study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:596–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zabarsky, TF, Sethi, AK, Donskey, CJ. Sustained reduction in inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in a long-term care facility through an educational intervention. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:476–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellinga, A, Galvin, S, Duane, S, et al. Intervention to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescribing for urinary tract infection: a cluster-randomized trial. CMAJ 2016;188:108–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irfan, N, Brooks, A, Mithoowani, S, et al. A controlled quasi-experimental study of an educational intervention to reduce the unnecessary use of antimicrobials for asymptomatic bacteriuria. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0132071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartley, SE, Kuhn, L, Valley, S, et al. Evaluating a hospitalist-based intervention to decrease unnecessary antimicrobial use in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1044–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trautner, BW, Grigoryan, L, Petersen, NJ, et al. Effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship approach for urinary catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1120–1127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egger, M, Balmer, F, Friedli-Wüthrich, H, Mühlemann, K. Reduction of urinary catheter use and prescription of antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in hospitalised patients in internal medicine: before-and-after intervention study. Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13796.Google ScholarPubMed
Trautner, BW, Kelly, PA, Petersen, N, et al. A hospital-site controlled intervention using audit and feedback to implement guidelines concerning inappropriate treatment of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria. Implement Sci 2011;6:41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linares, LA, Thornton, DJ, Strymish, J, et al. Electronic memorandum decreases unnecessary antimicrobial use for asymptomatic bacteriuria and culture-negative pyuria. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:644–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, CD, Kabara, JJ, Michienzi, SM, Malani, AN. Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship care bundle to improve the management of patients with suspected or confirmed urinary tract infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1499–1501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, F, Sarkar, K, Branche, A, et al. Preventing the inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria at a community teaching hospital. J Commun Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2012;2(2). doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v2i2.17814.Google Scholar
Landgren, FT, Harvey, KJ, Mashford, ML, Moulds, RF, Guthrie, B, Hemming, M. Changing antibiotic prescribing by educational marketing. Med J Aust 1988;149:595–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Timeline of intervention in relation to study groups.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Inclusion and exclusion.

Figure 2

Table 1.Patient Characteristics

Figure 3

Fig. 3.Proportion of patients inappropriately treated for ASP and/or ASB.

Figure 4

Table 2.Immediate and Sustained Impact of a Multi-faceted Stewardship Initiative

Supplementary material: Image

Cash et al. supplementary material

Cash et al. supplementary material 1

Download Cash et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.2 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Cash et al. supplementary material

Cash et al. supplementary material 2

Download Cash et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.2 MB