Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:52:06.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of HP-TLC method for rapid quantification of sugars, catechins, phenolic acids and saponins to assess Yam (Dioscorea spp.) tuber flour quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2018

V. Lebot*
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR AGAP, PO Box 946, Port-Vila, Vanuatu
R. Malapa
Affiliation:
Vanuatu Agricultural Research and Technical Centre, Santo PO Box 231, Vanuatu
T. Molisalé
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD), Ministry of Agriculture, PMB Santo, Vanuatu
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: lebot@vanuatu.com.vu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eight yam species (Dioscorea spp.) represented by 522 accessions (landraces and hybrids) were analysed for the individual sugars, catechins, phenolic acids and saponins contents of their tuber flours. Maltose, sucrose, glucose and fructose were quantified. Reducing sugars mean values were highly variable within species and ranged from 0.16%dry weight (DW) (SD ± 0.12) in D. dumetorum to 3.15%DW (±2.49) in D. esculenta. Maltose was detected only in D. esculenta. Chlorogenic acid, gallic acid and other phenolic acids ranged from 4.33 mg/g DW in D. bulbifera to 4.87 mg/g in D. alata and 9.55 mg/g in D. nummularia but were not detected in other species. Catechins (epicatechin and catechin) were highest in D. bulbifera bulbils (25.18 mg/g) and tubers (6.96 mg/g), and lowest in D. esculenta (0.32 mg/g). Their content is significantly correlated with dark flour colour and they most likely contribute to the oxidation of tuber flesh. Saponins (dioscin and gracillin) were quantified in only two species: D. cayenensis (5.94 mg/g, SD ± 3.78) and D. esculenta (3.74 mg/g, SD ± 3.72). Varietal selection may tend to reduce sugars levels and increase secondary metabolites with bioactive properties. HP-TLC is a suitable technique for the rapid quantification of compounds related to yam tuber flour quality.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. HP-TLC chromatograms (identified peaks are labelled with letters and unidentified peaks are labelled with figures): (a) pure standards for maltose (M), sucrose (S), glucose (G), fructose (F) and two acc. of D. esculenta showing variation in individual sugars content; (b) pure standard for allantoin (A), detection of a similar compound (probably allantoic acid) (1) presenting the same colour when exposed to white light and allantoin variation in three acc. of D. alata, two acc. of D. nummularia and one acc. of D. esculenta; (c) pure standards of chlorogenic acid (C), gallic acid (G) and unidentified compounds, with band 1 especially important in D. nummularia; (d) pure standards of catechin (C), epicatechin (E) and two other catechins (1 and 2) and three acc. of D. alata and two acc. of D. cayenensis; (e) pure standards of gracillin (G), dioscin (two bands) (D) and two other saponins (1 and 2) and their detection in three acc. of D. cayenensis.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. UV spectra of pure standards used for identification of compounds in methanolic extracts of Dioscorea spp. acc.: (a) maltose, (b) sucrose, (c) glucose, (d) fructose, (e) chlorogenic acid, (f) unknown, (g) gallic acid, (h) catechin and (i) epicatechin. The compounds, (j) dioscin, (k) gracillin, (l) allantoin, show no spectra and absorbance above 200 nm.

Figure 2

Table 1. Linearity of HP-TLC measurements, accuracy and precision of repetitions (peak areas versus concentrations applied)

Figure 3

Table 2. Dioscorea spp. flour colours, methanolic extracts absorption values and individual sugars contents

Figure 4

Table 3. Dioscorea spp. mean values for phenolic acids, catechins and saponins

Figure 5

Table 4. Spearman coefficient of correlations for Dioscorea spp. accessions (n = 522) for %DM, flour colour, absorbance of methanolic extract, total sugars, total phenolic acids and total saponins

Supplementary material: File

Lebot et al. supplementary material

Lebot et al. supplementary material 1

Download Lebot et al. supplementary material(File)
File 74.5 KB