Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:54:21.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2026

Cintia Vanesa Leder
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Sede Atlántica, CEANPa, Argentina CONICET, Argentina
Juan Manuel Seco Lopez
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Sede Atlántica, CEANPa, Argentina
Guadalupe Peter*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Sede Atlántica, CEANPa, Argentina CONICET, Argentina
Lucas Alejandro Garibaldi
Affiliation:
CONICET, Argentina Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Sede Andina, IRNAD, Argentina
*
Corresponding author: Guadalupe Peter; Email: gpeter@unrn.edu.ar
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Native pollinator-dependent plants are particularly vulnerable to habitat loss and other disturbances that disrupt pollen transfer. Understanding their reproductive biology is critical for assessing pollination dynamics, seed production, and their vulnerability to environmental change. This study addressed the reproductive strategies and dependence on cross-pollination of three native species in northeastern Patagonia (Larrea divaricata, Schinus johnstonii, and Neltuma flexuosa var. depressa). We applied controlled pollination treatments (cross-, self-, spontaneous-, and open-pollination) and measured the subsequent seed set and seed germination rates. L. divaricata exhibited higher seed set and higher germination capacity when natural pollination was allowed, compared to all manually pollinated treatments. This suggests that repeated visits and multiple pollen donors maximize seed production and seed quality. In S. johnstonii, a polygamous-dioecious species, seed production occurred even under pollinator-exclusion treatments, suggesting a contribution of wind pollination and/or alternative reproductive mechanisms. N. flexuosa var. depressa did not produce fruits under any treatment. These findings reveal contrasting reproductive strategies among Monte shrub species, highlighting that reproductive success may depend on different pollen-transfer pathways, from strong reliance on pollinator activity to potential airborne pollen contributions. Understanding these strategies is essential for conserving pollination processes, seed production, and the long-term resilience of arid Patagonian ecosystems.

Resumen

Resumen

Las plantas autóctonas dependientes de polinizadores son especialmente vulnerables a perturbaciones que afectan la transferencia de polen. Comprender su biología reproductiva es fundamental para comprender la dinámica de la polinización, la producción de semillas y su vulnerabilidad ante disturbios. Este estudio evaluó las estrategias reproductivas y la dependencia a la polinización en tres especies nativas del noreste de la Patagonia (Larrea divaricata, Schinus johnstonii, and Neltuma flexuosa var. depressa). Aplicamos tratamientos de polinización controlada (autopolinización, polinización cruzada, polinización espontánea y polinización natural), evaluando la producción de semillas y su capacidad germinativa. En L. divaricata la polinización abierta produjo más semillas y mayor capacidad germinativa, resaltando que las visitas repetidas de polinizadores y el polen proveniente de muchos individuos diferentes maximiza la producción y calidad de las semillas. S. johnstonii, especie polígamo-dioica, registró producción de semillas incluso bajo exclusión de polinizadores, indicando una posible polinización anemófila u otros mecanismos reproductivos. N. flexuosa var. depressa no produjo frutos bajo ningún tratamiento, lo que sugiere potenciales limitaciones reproductivas. Estos resultados revelan estrategias reproductivas contrastantes y destacan la importancia de comprenderlas para conservar la polinización, la producción de semillas y la resiliencia de los ecosistemas áridos de la Patagonia.

Topics structure

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Predicted mean seed set probability (± 95% confidence intervals) estimated from the generalized linear mixed model for L. divaricata (A) and Schinus johnstonii (B) under different pollination treatments, as estimated from the generalized linear mixed model. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments based on Tukey post hoc tests (p < 0.05). References: CROSS, cross-pollination; OPEN, open pollination; SELF, self-pollination; SPONT, spontaneous pollination.Figure 1. long description.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Predicted germination capacity (± 95% confidence intervals) for L. divaricata seeds from different pollination treatments, as estimated from the generalized linear mixed model. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments based on Tukey post hoc tests (p < 0.05). References: CROSS, cross-pollination; OPEN, open pollination; SELF, self-pollination; SPONT, spontaneous pollination.

Author comment: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R0/PR1

Comments

Viedma, January 14th, 2025

Dear Editor in Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Drylands

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Guadalupe Peter; I am affiliated with CEANPa (Universidad Nacional de Río Negro) and CONICET in Viedma, Argentina. I wish to submit an article to the forthcoming Themed Collection entitled “Drylands of South America: Ecology without borders that integrates environment and society”. This manuscript addressed an analysis of the effects of different pollination treatments on fruit set production and seed germination in Monte species. The manuscript is titled “Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia” and the authors are Cintia V. Leder, Juan M. Seco López, Guadalupe Peter and Lucas A. Garibaldi.

This study aligns closely with the aims of your journal, as it contributes to a better understanding of the reproductive dynamics of semi-arid plants. Through the study of a functionality aspect (pollination and germination), the manuscript explores the reproductive biology of three shrubby species from northeastern Patagonia, focusing in the effects of different pollination treatments on fruit production and seed germination capacities. Our aim is to understand how plants interact with their pollinators because this could provide information about the characteristics of the pollination service that these plant communities provide.

Thank you very much. With my best wishes,

Guadalupe PETER

CEANPa, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro

CONICET, Viedma, Argentina

Review: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Review of the manuscript “Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia” by Cintia V. Leder et al.

In this study, the authors investigate the mating system of three native Patagonian shrub species (Larrea divaricata, Schinus johnstonii, and Neltuma flexuosa) using hand-pollination experiments. In addition, seed germination of L. divaricata derived from different crossing treatments was evaluated. According to the results, L. divaricata and S. johnstonii exhibited some degree of self-incompatibility, which may promote outcrossing. Notably, L. divaricata produced no fruit. Seeds derived from cross-pollination showed higher germination rates than those from self-pollination.

Although the manuscript provides valuable data on the reproductive system of three species for which no previous information is available, I consider that the contribution is modest for understanding their reproductive biology (as suggested by the title) or even for clearly characterizing their mating systems. The objective of the study is not explicitly stated, and the necessary context to understand the underlying hypothesis is not provided (e.g., the claim that the species strongly depend on cross-pollination; L. 85–89). I believe the study should better justify the selection of these particular species and clarify whether, taken together, they offer an interesting comparative framework (e.g., species with perfect flowers vs. species with unisexual flowers). Moreover, the authors should elaborate on the broader relevance of knowing the mating systems of these species for an international audience, beyond the fact that their reproductive biology has not been previously described.

In addition, I consider the sample size to be relatively small (7 to 15 plants per species), and the statistical treatment of the expected non-independence among flowers within the same plant is not clear. In this type of experiment, it is essential to emasculate flowers (in the case of hermaphroditic flowers) and to rule out apomixis in order to confidently attribute seed production to the applied pollen treatments and thus infer the mating system. In lines 148–150, it is stated that “Fruit set was calculated by dividing the number of seeds obtained by the number of ovules per floral unit,” which is clearly incorrect. What the authors are describing corresponds to seed set, not fruit set. Reporting fruit set would be highly valuable.

The statistical approach used (ANOVA) is not the most appropriate for this type of data, particularly when hierarchical structure is present (flowers nested within plants). I suggest the use of a mixed-effects model with a binomial distribution, which is suitable for proportion data and allows plant identity to be included as a random factor. It is also necessary to clarify which post hoc test was used to support the differences reported in Tables 1 and 2.

Finally, the discussion should be structured around an argumentative axis consistent with the objectives of the study, which are currently not explicit. The finding regarding anther functionality in S. johnstonii is particularly interesting; however, it is not anticipated in the introduction and therefore appears disconnected from the overall narrative of the manuscript. I suggest that a more coherent storyline could be developed based on the idea that sympatric, unrelated species may exhibit convergent reproductive strategies in response to similar selective pressures.

Review: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests.

Comments

An interesting work on one of the crucial aspects of plant species ecology. However, before considering for publication, changes to this MS need to be carried out.

In the present state, it is relatively poor on results, and I find it more suitable for submitting as Rapid Communication. Since no results in Neltuma flexuosa var. depressa, I would exclude this species from the study. Indices are presented only in the text. Why they are not a part of a table or figure? Despite zero germinations of Schinus johnstonii seeds, I would show these results in the Table 2.

Introduction:

I would also discuss the effect of habitat fragmentation on wild plant species distribution changes. Please, more describe the original vegetation of the region. I prefer moving of the species description from M&M to this section and emphasizing of their importance for the ecosystem.

Material and Methods:

Line 148: Is the “fruit set” a correct parameter name? It seems to be “seed set”.

Line 157: Please, explain why the germination test was conducted under full light?

Conclusions:

Line 223: You did not study the insect-mediated pollination, did you?

Recommendation: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R1/PR6

Comments

Viedma, June 19th 2026

Dear Editor in Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Drylands

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Guadalupe Peter; I am affiliated with CEANPa (Universidad Nacional de Río Negro) and CONICET in Viedma, Argentina. I am pleased to submit the revised version of the manuscript DRY-2026-0002, entitled “Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia”. We have carefully considered the comments of the reviewers and adjusted the manuscript accordingly. A detailed response to the reviewers is provided in the accompanying document.

Thank you very much. With my best wishes,

Guadalupe PETER

CEANPa, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro

CONICET, Viedma, Argentina

Recommendation: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R1/PR7

Comments

Dear Guadalupe

I am very happy with the way that you have addressed the reviewers' comments and am able to recommend the paper for publication. The manuscript is extremely well written. Congratulations on a nice piece of work that’s very succinct.

I’ve been through the entire manuscript and ask that you make a couple of small changes. You can make these changes when you submit the final version to the journal (the journal will ask you to upload a final version). If they do not, then you can make these changes at the proof sheet stage. Please don’t forget to do this.

L85: plants (plural)

L135: there is no published evidence

L174: has indicated

L191 and 210: delete the word ‘were’

L218: …. pollinator availability

L340: move ’this’ to ‘this could explain’

Decision: Reproductive biology of three species of northeastern Patagonia — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.