Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:29:54.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unintended Consequences of Pretransplant Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Screening on Antimicrobial Stewardship Among Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

Erica J. Stohs,
Trenton MacAllister,
Steven A. Pergam,
Elizabeth M. Krantz,
Rupali Jain,
Ania Sweet and
Catherine Liu
Erica J. Stohs*
Affiliation:
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
Trenton MacAllister
Affiliation:
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
Steven A. Pergam
Affiliation:
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
Elizabeth M. Krantz
Affiliation:
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
Rupali Jain
Affiliation:
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ania Sweet
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Catherine Liu
Affiliation:
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
*
Address correspondence to Erica Stohs, MD MPH, 1100 Fairview Ave, North, E4-100, Seattle, WA 98109 (estohs@fredhutch.org).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE)-directed antimicrobial use and VRE bacteremia in a cohort of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation patients from a center where VRE screening is standard prior to transplant. In this cohort, VRE bacteremia (VREB) was infrequent. In patients without VREB, colonized patients received VRE therapy more often than noncolonized patients.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:730–733

Information

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 39 , Issue 6 , June 2018, pp. 730 - 733
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is commonly performed prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), although its role in the prevention of healthcare-associated transmission is debated. Also, VRE colonization has been associated with an increased risk of VRE bacteremia (VREB)Reference Alevizakos, Gaitanidis, Nasioudis, Tori, Flokas and Mylonakis 1 and mortality in HCT recipients.Reference Tavadze, Rybicki and Mossad 2 It is unclear whether this is a causal relationship or, as some studies suggest, VRE represents a marker of underlying comorbidities and poor overall clinical status.Reference Tavadze, Rybicki and Mossad 2 – Reference Lisboa, Miranda and Vieira 4

Guidelines for the management of febrile neutropenia suggest modification of initial empiric therapy to consider including a VRE-active agent based on history of prior colonization or high institutional prevalence.Reference Freifeld, Bow and Sepkowitz 5 One study found that empiric linezolid use in persistently febrile VRE-colonized hematology and HCT patients had no mortality benefit.Reference Lisboa, Miranda and Vieira 4 The emergence of daptomycin-nonsusceptibleReference DiPippo, Tverdek and Tarrand 6 and linezolid-resistantReference Krull, Klare and Ross 7 VRE highlights the need for judicious use of these agents. Data examining the impact of VRE colonization on use of empiric VRE therapy in the HCT population are limited. We sought to determine the effect of pretransplant VRE colonization status on the use of VRE therapy among allogeneic HCT patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients ≥18 years old who received their first allogeneic HCT at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC)/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance between September 1, 2007, and August 31, 2016. We recorded dates and times of VRE colonization, VRE bacteremia, and utilization of available antimicrobial agents with in vitro activity against VRE that achieved sufficient serum concentrations for treatment of bacteremia (linezolid, daptomycin, and quinupristin/dalfopristin) within the first 100 days posttransplant. Colonization status was determined from CHROMagar (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) identification of VRE on rectal or stool swabs obtained 1 week prior to transplant and weekly thereafter. Because duration of colonization is often prolonged among HCT recipients,Reference Banach, Bearman and Barnden 8 if any swab was positive for VRE prior to transplant, the patient was considered colonized. We defined VRE as any Enterococcus species with resistant or intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin. Patients colonized post-HCT and those with VRE-positive surveillance blood cultures, defined as blood cultures obtained in the outpatient setting while patients were asymptomatic, were excluded from analysis.

Primary analyses were performed among patients without VREB for whom the primary outcome was receipt of VRE therapy within 100 days posttransplant and the main exposure was pretransplant VRE colonization. Secondary outcomes included duration of and indications for therapy. Variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.

For the subgroup of patients who developed VREB, we recorded time from blood culture collection to initiation of VRE therapy for suspected bacteremia or sepsis. Empiric VRE therapy was defined as the receipt of VRE therapy within 24 hours of blood culture collection and was the main exposure variable for secondary analyses. Outcomes included duration of bacteremia, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer within 72 hours, and 30-day mortality. Duration of bacteremia was the time from initial positive VRE blood culture to the first negative culture without any VRE-positive cultures in the subsequent 30 days or death, whichever came first. Death was treated as a competing risk for clearance of bacteremia. Median, 25th, and 75th percentiles of duration of VREB were estimated using cumulative incidence curves; groups were compared using competing risks regression. Binary outcomes were compared using the Fisher exact test and exact logistic regression. All models included unadjusted models and bivariable models adjusting for pretransplant assessment of mortality (PAM) scores.Reference Au, Gooley and Armand 9 Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The FHCRC Institutional Review Board approved this study.

RESULTS

Figure 1 illustrates the numbers of patients with VREB, VRE colonization, and receipt of VRE therapy among 1,394 HCT patients analyzed. Of 1,372 patients who did not develop VREB, 67 (5%) received VRE therapy within 100 days posttransplant. Of those who did not develop VREB, VRE-colonized patients were more likely to receive VRE therapy than noncolonized patients (32 of 180 (18%) vs 35 of 1,192 (3%); P<.001). The median durations of VRE therapy were 3 days in the colonized group and 2 days in the noncolonized group (P=.84). Indications for VRE therapy are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

FIGURE 1

Flow diagram.

Overall, 22 patients (1.6%) developed VREB; 19 cases (86%) occurred among those colonized prior to transplantation. Furthermore, 8 patients (36%), all known to be colonized pretransplant, received empiric VRE therapy to which all isolates were susceptible (Table 1). The VREB patients who received empiric therapy were more likely to be transferred to the ICU within 72 hours of blood culture collection (71% vs 0; P=.003). There were no significant differences in median duration of bacteremia (P=.21) or 30-day mortality (P=.99). Overall survival was also similar between patients who did and did not receive empiric therapy (Supplemental Figure 1). Among 12 blood culture isolates with daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data, 4 had an MIC>4 µg/mL, 4 had an MIC of 4 µg/mL, and 4 had an MIC<4 µg/mL. Also, 1 isolate had a linezolid MIC of 8 µg/mL.

TABLE 1

Characteristics and Outcomes for 22 Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Bacteremia Patients by Receipt of Empiric VRE TherapyFootnote a

NOTE. HCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; IQR, interquartile range; GVHD, graft versus host disease; PAM, pretransplant assessment of mortality; VREB, VRE bacteremia.

a Percentages are computed among nonmissing values.

b Status at time of transplant unless otherwise specified.

c By date of first positive VRE blood culture.

d Pretransplant assessment of mortality score predicts survival after allogeneic HCT by integrating the following variables: patient age, disease risk, donor relationship, human leukocyte antigen matching, type of conditioning regimen, and measures of pulmonary, renal, and hepatic comorbidities.

e Dose information provided for the 3 patients who received daptomycin in the VRE empiric therapy group and 13 patients who received daptomycin in the no VRE empiric therapy group.

f Only evaluated among 17 patients who were not already in the ICU at the time of first positive blood culture.

*P=.14 (unadjusted), 0.21 (adjusted for PAM score).

**P=.003 (unadjusted), n/a (adjusted for PAM score).

***P=.99 (unadjusted and adjusted for PAM score).

DISCUSSION

In the absence of VREB, HCT patients who were colonized with VRE prior to transplantation were more likely to receive VRE therapy than noncolonized patients. Among the subgroup of patients with VREB, there were no significant differences in duration of bacteremia or 30-day mortality regardless of whether they received empiric therapy.

Controversy continues regarding the value of timely initiation of VRE therapy in patients with VRE bacteremia.Reference Lisboa, Miranda and Vieira 4 , Reference Zasowski, Claeys, Lagnf, Davis and Rybak 10 Some suggest using colonization status,Reference Zasowski, Claeys, Lagnf, Davis and Rybak 10 while others propose prediction scores to help guide use of empiric VRE therapy.Reference Webb, Healy and Majers 11 Some question the virulence of VRE in the HCT population and suggest that it is a surrogate marker of the severity of patients’ underlying disease and complications.Reference Tavadze, Rybicki and Mossad 2 , Reference Dubberke, Hollands and Georgantopoulos 3 While empiric linezolid use in VRE-colonized HCT patients did not confer survival benefit, persistence of neutropenia and GVHD were associated with increased mortality.Reference Lisboa, Miranda and Vieira 4 In another study of HCT recipients, VREB did not impact post-HCT survival and delayed initiation of daptomycin or linezolid did not affect duration of bacteremia.Reference Hefazi, Damlaj and Alkhateeb 12 Outcomes from our small cohort of VREB appear congruent with these studies, suggesting limited benefit of empiric VRE therapy.

Our analyses also identified important stewardship opportunities targeting use of VRE therapy. The use of VRE therapy among VRE-colonized non-VREB patients demonstrated a potential consequence of VRE screening. In addition, daptomycin use as an alternative to vancomycin for red man syndrome highlighted a need for educational feedback to prescribers. Increasing utilization of rapid molecular diagnostics may also help limit overuse.

This study has some limitations inherent to retrospective analyses. First, the period analyzed was subject to changes in clinical practice, which may have confounded our results. Lab-reported daptomycin MIC values were not routinely available until the latter third of the study period, limiting evaluation of trends in daptomycin susceptibility. The implementation of Verigene (Nanosphere, Northbrook, IL) at the end of our study period may influence future use of VRE therapy. Our study was not powered to detect differences in outcomes among patients who did and did not receive empiric therapy for VREB. Finally, our low VRE colonization and bacteremia rates may not be generalizable to other centers.

In conclusion, our findings suggest potential unintended consequences of VRE screening in our HCT population. Furthermore, VRE colonized status was associated with increased use of VRE-directed therapy in non-VRE bacteremic HCT patients. Among patients with VREB, there were no differences in duration of bacteremia or 30-day mortality, whether or not they received empiric VRE therapy. Antimicrobial stewardship implications should be considered when determining VRE screening and isolation policies in centers performing HCT.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial support: No financial support was provided relevant to this study.

Potential conflicts of interest: S.A.P. has served as a consultant for and has participated in clinical trials with Chimerix and Merck & Co. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2018.43

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. Portions of this work were presented at IDWeek on October 6, 2017, in San Diego, California.

References

REFERENCES

1. Alevizakos, M, Gaitanidis, A, Nasioudis, D, Tori, K, Flokas, ME, Mylonakis, E. Colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci and risk for bloodstream infection among patients with malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:1–10.Google Scholar
2. Tavadze, M, Rybicki, L, Mossad, S, et al. Risk factors for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia and its influence on survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl 2014;49:1310–1316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dubberke, ER, Hollands, JM, Georgantopoulos, P, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infections on a hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit: Are the sick getting sicker? Bone Marrow Transpl 2006;38:813–819.Google Scholar
4. Lisboa, LF, Miranda, BG, Vieira, MB, et al. Empiric use of linezolid in febrile hematology and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. Int J Infect Dis 2015;33:171–176.Google Scholar
5. Freifeld, AG, Bow, EJ, Sepkowitz, KA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e56–e93.Google Scholar
6. DiPippo, AJ, Tverdek, FP, Tarrand, JJ, et al. Daptomycin non-susceptible Enterococcus faecium in leukemia patients: role of prior daptomycin exposure. J Infect 2017;74:243–247.Google Scholar
7. Krull, M, Klare, I, Ross, B, et al. Emergence of linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a department for hematologic stem cell transplantation. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:31.Google Scholar
8. Banach, DB, Bearman, G, Barnden, M, et al. Duration of contact precautions for acute-care settings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018:1–18.Google Scholar
9. Au, BKC, Gooley, TA, Armand, P, et al. Reevaluation of the pretransplant assessment of mortality score after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 2015;21:848–854.Google Scholar
10. Zasowski, EJ, Claeys, KC, Lagnf, AM, Davis, SL, Rybak, MJ. Time is of the essence: the impact of delayed antibiotic therapy on patient outcomes in hospital-onset enterococcal bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:1242–1250.Google Scholar
11. Webb, BJ, Healy, R, Majers, J, et al. Prediction of bloodstream infection due to vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in patients undergoing leukemia induction or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:1753–1759.Google Scholar
12. Hefazi, M, Damlaj, M, Alkhateeb, H, et al. Vancomycin‐resistant enterococcus colonization and bloodstream infection: prevalence, risk factors, and the impact on early outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Transpl Infect Dis 2016;18:913–920.Google Scholar
Figure 0

FIGURE 1Flow diagram.

Figure 1

TABLE 1Characteristics and Outcomes for 22 Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Bacteremia Patients by Receipt of Empiric VRE Therapya

Supplementary material: Image

Stohs et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Stohs et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 898.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Stohs et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Stohs et al. supplementary material(File)
File 95.4 KB