Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T19:14:15.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ifugao agricultural landscapes: Agro-cultural complexes and the intensification debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

Abstract

Most models that explain the development of agricultural systems suggest evolutionary relationships between extensive (e.g. swidden cultivation) and intensive (e.g. wet-rice cultivation) forms of production. Recent information from highland Southeast Asian farming systems questions the validity of this assumption. As a case in point, this article presents the results of a combined ethnographic study and spatial analysis of the Ifugao agricultural system in the northern Philippines, focusing in particular on the relationships among intensive rice terracing, swidden farming and agroforestry (Ifugao forest management). Informed by the Ifugao example, this article suggests that extensive and intensive systems are often concurrent and compatible components of a broad-spectrum lifeway.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 2012
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location map of Ifugao Province, Northern Philippines

Figure 1

Figure 2. Profile of an Ifugao terrace system. Stephen Acabado, ‘The archaeology of Ifugao agricultural terraces: Antiquity and social organization’ (Ph.D. diss, University of Hawai'i, 2010), p. 83

Figure 2

Table 1: Land use categories of the Ifugao

Figure 3

Figure 3. Distribution of rice terraces and swidden fields across the 13 agricultural districts of North Central Cordillera

Figure 4

Table 2: Summary of terrace features from individual agricultural districts

Figure 5

Table 3: Correlation matrix between land area of individual rice terrace and elevation, slope, aspect, distance to hamlets, and distance to water source in each agricultural district

Figure 6

Table 4: Results of linear regressions between size of individual rice terrace and elevation

Figure 7

Figure 4. Frequency distribution of the average slope of rice fields (y values = number of terraced rice fields)

Figure 8

Figure 5. Frequency distribution of the aspect of terraced rice fields

Figure 9

Figure 6. Frequency distribution of the minimum distance of rice fields from villages (y values = number of terraced rice fields)

Figure 10

Table 5: Summary of swidden field features from individual agricultural districts

Figure 11

Table 6: Results of linear regression between size of individual swidden field and elevation