Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T20:08:43.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vortex shedding from cylinders with two step discontinuities in diameter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2020

Chris Morton*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
S. Yarusevych
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
*
†Email address for correspondence: chris.morton@ucalgary.ca

Abstract

A dual-step cylinder is a canonical geometry commonly encountered in many practical flows. It consists of a large diameter cylinder ($D$) attached coaxially to the mid-span of a small diameter cylinder ($d$). This work provides a comprehensive description of the flow development, classifies common wake regimes and considers the associated structural loading on a dual-step cylinder. The influence of the aspect ratio of the large diameter cylinder ($L/D$) and diameter ratio ($D/d$) is studied experimentally for a Reynolds number of $Re_D = 2100$, $1.33\leq D/d \leq 4$ and $0.2\leq L/D \leq 5$. The flow evolution and structural loading are quantified via a combination of flow visualization, Laser Doppler velocimetry, particle image velocimetry measurements and multi-component force balance measurements. Through a detailed analysis of the results, six distinct flow regimes are identified based on observed changes in the flow development downstream of the large diameter cylinder. The findings are distilled into a map of flow regimes that provides a framework for analysis of the dual-step cylinder wakes and incorporates limiting cases of this geometry, namely, uniform circular cylinders, cantilevered cylinders, cylinders with two free ends, coin-like cylinders and single-step cylinders. The identified flow regimes are also related to changes in structural loading.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1.Experimental set-up for planar PIV and force measurements. The origin of the coordinate system is located at the midspan of the large cylinder along its axis. Instantaneous velocity fields are shown in place of the raw particle images for illustrative purposes in (a,b).

Figure 1

Table 1.Uniform cylinder model configurations and associated experimental measurements completed in the present study.

Figure 2

Table 2.Dual-step cylinder model configurations and associated experimental measurements completed in the present study at $Re_D = 2100$. The diameter of the large cylinder is fixed at $D = 25.4\ \textrm {mm}$. Model configurations studied are for discrete $D/d$ values of $1.33$, $1.6$, $2.0$, $2.67$ and $4.0$.

Figure 3

Figure 2.Sketch of flow regimes expected for a dual-step cylinder based on changes in $D/d$ and $L/D$. The boundaries between different regimes are marked by dashed lines as they are approximated from consolidation of the results from other relevant studies. Note that this approximated map pertains to Reynolds numbers corresponding to the shear layer transition regime.

Figure 4

Figure 3.Mean, r.m.s. and instantaneous wake topology of a uniform circular cylinder at $Re_D = 2100$. $(a)$ Instantaneous vorticity. $(b)$ Mean velocity. $(c)$ The r.m.s. velocity.

Figure 5

Figure 4.Changes in the instantaneous vorticity field in the wake for each identified flow regime at $Re_D = 2100$. $(a)$ LFS regime, $L/D = 3$, $D/d = 1.33$. $(b)$ LFS regime, $L/D = 5$, $D/d = 2$. $(c)$ IS regime, $L/D = 5$, $D/d = 2$. $(d)$ IS regime, $L/D = 5$, $D/d = 2.67$. $(e)$ AIS regime, $L/D = 0.5$, $D/d = 4.0$. $(\,f)$ HFS regime, $L/D = 1$, $D/d = 2.0$. $(g)$ NS regime, $L/D = 0.2$, $D/d = 2.0$. $(h)$ NS regime, $L/D = 0.5$, $D/d = 2.0$.

Figure 6

Figure 5.Changes in the mean velocity in the wake for each identified flow regime at $Re_D = 2100$. $(a)$ LFS Regime $(L/D = 3,\ D/d = 1.33)$. $(b)$ LFS regime $(L/D = 5,\ D/d = 2)$. $(c)$ IS regime $(L/D = 5,\ D/d = 2)$. $(d)$ IS regime $(L/D = 5,\ D/d = 2.67)$. $(e)$ AIS regime $(L/D = 0.5,\ D/d = 4.0)$. $(\,f)$ HFS regime $(L/D = 1,\ D/d = 2.0)$. $(g)$ NS regime $(L/D = 0.2,\ D/d = 2.0)$. $(h)$ NS regime $(L/D = 0.5,\ D/d = 2.0)$.

Figure 7

Figure 6.Changes in the r.m.s. velocity in the wake for each identified flow regime at $Re_D = 2100$. $(a)$ LFS regime $(L/D = 3,\ D/d = 1.33)$. $(b)$ LFS regime $(L/D = 5,\ D/d = 2)$. $(c)$ IS regime $(L/D = 5,\ D/d = 2)$. $(d)$ IS regime $(L/D = 5,\ D/d = 2.67)$. $(e)$ AIS regime $(L/D = 0.5,\ D/d = 4.0)$. $(\,f)$ HFS regime $(L/D = 1,\ D/d = 2.0)$. $(g)$ NS regime $(L/D = 0.2,\ D/d = 2.0)$. $(h)$ NS regime $(L/D = 0.5,\ D/d = 2.0)$.

Figure 8

Figure 7.Wake vortex topology in the IS regime for $L/D = 3$ and $Re_D = 2100$: $(a)$$D/d = 1.6$, $(b)$$D/d = 2$, $(c)$$D/d = 2.67$.

Figure 9

Figure 8.Variation in the vortex formation length in the $x$–$y$ plane at $z/D = 0$.

Figure 10

Figure 9.Changes in the mean wake velocity deficit in the $x$–$z$ plane for each identified flow regime at $Re_D = 2100$. $(a)$ LFS regime, $L/D = 3.0$, $D/d = 1.33$. $(b)$ IS regime, $L/D = 3.0$, $D/d = 2$. $(c)$ HFS regime, $L/D = 1.0$, $D/d = 2$. $(d)$ NS regime, $L/D = 0.2$, $D/d = 2$.

Figure 11

Figure 10.Changes in the r.m.s. velocity of the wake in for an $x$–$z$ plane at $y/D = 0$ for $Re_D = 2100$. $(a)$ LFS regime, $L/D = 3.0$, $D/d = 1.33$. $(b)$ IS regime, $L/D = 3.0$, $D/d = 2$. $(c)$ HFS regime, $L/D = 1.0$, $D/d = 2$. $(d)$ NS regime, $L/D = 0.2$, $D/d = 2$.

Figure 12

Figure 11.Surface visualization of flow separation and wake visualizations for dual-step cylinders: (a,b) IS regime, $D/d = 2$ and $L/D = 3$, (c,d) HFS regime, $D/d = 2$ and $L/D = 1$ and (e,f) NS regime, $D/d = 2$ and $L/D = 0.5$. Vertical white dashed lines in the surface visualization images (a, c, e) identify the separation location for a uniform cylinder of diameter $D$.

Figure 13

Figure 12.Spectral analysis of velocity measurements obtained in the wake of a dual-step cylinder at $x/D = 5, y/D = 0.75, z/D = 0$, for $Re_D = 2100$. (a) $D/d = 1.33$. (b) $D/d = 1.6$. (c) $D/d = 2.0$. (d) $D/d = 2.67$. (e) $D/d = 4.0$.

Figure 14

Figure 13.Diagram of large cylinder wake regimes expected for a dual-step cylinder. The boundaries between different regimes are marked by solid and dashed lines, with the latter drawn based on extrapolation of the present data and results from other relevant studies. $+$ symbols represent the $L/D$ and $D/d$ investigated at $Re_D = 2100$, $\bigcirc$ symbols represent the $L/D$ and $D/d$ investigated at $Re_D = 1050$ by Morton & Yarusevych (2012), $\square$ are data from Zdravkovich et al. (1989), $\times$ are data from Zdravkovich et al. (1998), $\triangle$ are data from Inoue & Sakuragi (2008), $\triangleright$ are data from Dunn & Tavoularis (2006) and $\triangledown$ are data from Lewis & Gharib (1992). Solid grey is used to identify the region where the dual-step cylinder flow regime is unknown. Note that this map pertains to Reynolds numbers corresponding to the shear layer transition regime.

Figure 15

Figure 14.Distribution of the eigenmode energy obtained from a POD analysis of two-dimensional PIV measurements in the wake of a dual-step cylinder in an $x\text {--}y$ plane at $z/D = 0$. The legend in $(a)$ applies to both images.

Figure 16

Figure 15.Effects of diameter ratio and aspect ratio on the drag coefficient for a dual-step cylinder at $Re_D = 2100$. The drag coefficient is computed based on the frontal area of the dual-step cylinder model. Data at $D/d = 1$ in $(a)$ pertain to a uniform cylinder of diameter $D$, while data at $L/D = 0$ in $(b)$ pertain to a uniform cylinder of diameter $d$.

Figure 17

Figure 16.Contour plots of the drag coefficient at $Re_D = 2100$ for: $(a)$ a dual-step cylinder, and $(b)$ the large cylinder. Note, boundaries between different flow regimes are marked with solid and dashed lines, with the latter drawn based on extrapolation of the present data and results from other relevant studies. See figure 13 for additional details.

Figure 18

Figure 17.Estimates of the large cylinder drag coefficient at $Re_D = 2100$ for $L/D = 5$. Data from Wieselsberger (1922) are shown with a dashed line.

Figure 19

Figure 18.Contour plot of the lift force fluctuations on the dual-step cylinder relative to a uniform cylinder of diameter $d$ for $Re_D = 2100$. Note: the boundaries between different regimes are marked by solid and dashed lines, with the latter drawn based on extrapolation of the present data and results from other relevant studies. See figure 13 for additional details.

Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie

Hydrogen bubble flow visualization of shear layer instabilities within the IS regime for a dual step cylinder at ReD = 2100, D=d = 2:67, and L=D = 3.

Download Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie(Video)
Video 9.8 MB

Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie

Hydrogen bubble flow visualization of vortex shedding from a dual step cylinder in the NS Regime at ReD = 2100, D=d = 2, and L=D = 0:2.
Download Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie(Video)
Video 32 MB

Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie 3

Hydrogen bubble flow visualization of vortex shedding from a dual step cylinder in the IS Regime at ReD = 2100, D=d = 2, and L=D = 3.

Download Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie 3(Video)
Video 22 MB

Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie 4

Hydrogen bubble flow visualization of vortex shedding from a dual step cylinder in the HFS Regime at ReD = 2100, D=d = 2, and L=D = 1.

Download Morton and Yarusevych supplementary movie 4(Video)
Video 21 MB