Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:32:20.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Associations between the White Sea colonial hydroid Dynamena pumila and microorganisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2012

O.A. Gorelova
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
O.I. Baulina
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
I.A. Kosevich*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
E.S. Lobakova
Affiliation:
Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: I.A. Kosevich, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia email: ikos@mail.ru
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Marine sessile invertebrates with outer skeleton constitute additional substrate for a diverse group of epibiotic organisms. Colonial hydroids are no exception. Large numbers of motile and sessile organisms use hydroid colonies covered with chitinous perisarc for permanent or temporal attachment. Such epibiotic associations between colonial hydroids and microorganisms are poorly studied and mostly known for subtropical regions. There are no data about the development of such epibiotic association and type of its specificity yet. The present paper for the first time describes the epibiotic association of the colonial thecate hydroid Dynamena pumila from the high latitude sea. We reconstruct the spatial and temporal development of such epibiotic community and analyse the organization of the multicomponent biofilm covering the hydroid colony. Comparison of the epibiotic community in different seasons indicates for holding out of the basal features and components of the community during the whole year. Ultrastructural investigations revealed that components of the biofilm affect the outer skeleton of the hydroid colony that results in penetration of the microorganisms into the skeleton and even soft tissues. Our data allow supposing that association of hydroid D. pumila with a microorganism community has features of a symbiotic system.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Organization of Dynamena pumila shoot. Only the perisarc (outer skeleton) is visible: (A) general view of the upper part of the shoot; (B) details of the internode organization; (C) distal part of the shoot (scanning electron microscopy). Agt, apical surface of the growing tip; br, lateral branch; c, constrictions between internodes; di, developing internode; gt, growing tip; h, hydranth; hb, hydranth rudiment; ht, hydrotheca; i, internode; ov, operculum valves; sha, shoot axis rudiment. Scale bar: 300 μm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Association of epibiotic microorganisms upon the surface of growing shoots in Dynamena pumila colonies: (A) general view (scanning electron microscopy); (B) bacterial cushion between diatoms and perisarc (transmission electron microscopy (TEM)); (C) bacteria penetration into the diatom cells (TEM); (D) structural integration of microorganisms in the biofilm (TEM). b, bacterium; c, cyanobacterium; d, diatom; ds, diatom shell; im, intercellular matrix; ma, microalga; p, perisarc; st, soft tissue. Scale bars: A, 10 µm; B, D, 1 µm; C, 2 µm.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Association of epibiotic microorganisms upon the surface of survived shoots during the polar night or dead shoots of Dynamena pumila colonies (scanning electron microscopy): (A) diversity of prokaryotic microorganisms within the biofilm of survived shoots during the polar night shoots; (B) part of the embalmed biofilm on the dead shoots. c, cyanobacterium; d, diatom. Scale bars: A, 5 µm; B, 10 µm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Correlation between the ages of the Dynamena pumila shoot internode and the number of associated diatoms. Data present the number of diatoms on the frontal side of the apical part of four different shoots.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The number of diatoms and prokaryotes (A) and cyanobacteria (B) on the perisarc of the frontal side of the apical fragment of individual Dynamena pumila shoot. For diatoms the data present the number of cells for whole frontal side of the internode including stem and hydrothecae surfaces. For prokaryotes, the average number of individuals (cells, trichomes and clasters) is given for topologically similar surfaces equal to 500 µm2 and free of diatoms.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Correlation between the number of prokaryotic individuals (cells, triсhomes and clasters) on the diatom-free space (500 µm2) and the number of diatoms on the frontal side of internode perisarc in Dynamena pumila. The average number and standard deviation for each count are shown. The calculated regression line corresponds to the equation y = 2.17 * x4,62 + 102.5. Correlation R2 = 0.81.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Correlation between cell number of non-phototrophic prokaryotes and number of cyanobacteria individuals (clasters and triсhomes) upon the diatom-free space (500 µm2) on perisarc of internode frontal side in Dynamena pumila. The data show the average number of cells, clasters and triсhomes and standard deviation. Correlation is equal to 0.98.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Spatial integration of Dynamena pumila and microorganisms: (A) diatoms and bacteria upon the outer and inner surface of operculum valves (transmission electron microscopy (TEM)); (B) fusion of perisarc and microbial sheath substance (TEM); (C) trichome cyanobacteria adhesion to the perisarc (scanning electron microscopy); (D–F) partial intrusion of bacteria and diatoms into the non-sclerotized material of skeleton (TEM). b, bacterium; c, cyanobacterium; d, diatom; ov, operculum valve; p, perisarc; sh, sheath. Scale bars: A, 2 µm; B, D, F, 1 µm; C, 3 µm; E, 0.5 µm.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Localization of epibiotic microorganisms inside the perisarc: (A) diversity of microorganisms revealed after dissection of shoot parts free of biofilm (scanning electron microscopy (SEM)); (B) microalgae inside the perisarc wall (transmission electron microscopy (TEM)); (C) bacterial microcolonies inside the perisarc wall (TEM); (D) bacteria within the inner space of natural perforations (surface view) (SEM). b, bacterium; bf, biofilm; c, cyanobacterium; ds, diatom shell; ma, microalga; p, perisarc; st, soft tissue. Scale bars: A, 5 µm; B, C, 2 µm; D, 10 µm.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Coenosarc fragments containing vacuoles with diatom shell wreckage (A) and bodies similar with prokaryotic oxygen-evolving phototrophic microorganisms (OPM) (B) (transmission electron microscopy). ds, diatom shell; opm, OPM-like bodies. Scale bars: А, 5 μm; В, 10 µm.