Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:13:54.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and corrosion behavior of Ni–Fe–Cr alloy 028

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2014

L.N. Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
J.A. Szpunar
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon S7N5A9, Canada
J.X. Dong
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
M.C. Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: linazhang_doctor@hotmail.com

Abstract

To thoroughly understand the relationship between heat treatments and characteristics of both microstructure and corrosion behavior of Ni–Fe–Cr alloy 028, a series of heat treatments were carried out. The area fraction of precipitates increases with increasing duration of aging treatment at 900 °C. The precipitation rate is higher at 900 °C than at 850 and 950 °C. The precipitates are formed both in grains and at grain boundaries, this behavior enhances the hardness. The corrosion behavior was evaluated by potentiodynamic polarization test and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurement under sodium chloride solution. The results indicate that the variation of morphology, amount, and distribution of precipitates attributed to the heat treatment strongly influences the corrosion behavior of alloy 028 in the sodium chloride solution. There is a galvanic effect of Cr-rich phase in the corrosion process. The increase of corrosion rate with the aging time is attributed to the acceleration of the microgalvanic corrosion.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Chemical composition of alloy 028 (wt%).

Figure 1

TABLE II. Heat treatments of alloy 028.

Figure 2

FIG. 1. Optical images of the specimens after different heat treatments: (a) heat treatment A; (b) heat treatment B; (c) heat treatment C; (d) heat treatment D; (e) heat treatment E.

Figure 3

FIG. 2. SEM micrograph of specimen D.

Figure 4

TABLE III. EDS results of the major chemical composition of various phases of specimen D (wt%).

Figure 5

FIG. 3. Microstructures of the specimens after different heat treatments: (a) heat treatment A; (b) heat treatment B; (c) heat treatment C; (d) heat treatment D; (e) heat treatment E.

Figure 6

FIG. 4. Influence of heat treatments on precipitation.

Figure 7

FIG. 5. Calculated phase diagrams of alloy 028 using Thermo-Calc software: (a) relationship of mass fraction of phases to temperature; (b) partial enlarged detail of (a).

Figure 8

FIG. 6. Influence of precipitation on Vickers hardness.

Figure 9

FIG. 7. Potentiodynamic polarization curves in 0.5 mol/L NaCl solution at room temperature. The specimens were aged at different temperatures for various durations.

Figure 10

FIG. 8. Variations of (a) icorr and (b) corrosion rate of the specimens after different heat treatments.

Figure 11

FIG. 9. EIS spectra presented as Nyquist plots. The specimens subjected to different heat treatments: (a) heat treatment A; (b) heat treatment B; (c) heat treatment C; (d) heat treatment D; (e) heat treatment E.

Figure 12

FIG. 10. Surface morphology (SEM) of the specimens after the measurement of potentiodynamic polarization tests in 0.5 mol/L NaCl solution at room temperature. (a) Heat treatment B; (b) Heat treatment C; (c) Heat treatment D.

Figure 13

FIG. 11. Schematic illustration of the corrosion process.