Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:36:29.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Therapeutic efficacy of topical application of dexamethasone to the round window niche after acoustic trauma caused by intensive impulse noise in guinea pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

F-L Chi*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
M-Q Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Y-D Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
B Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
*
Address for correspondence: Dr F-L Chi, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China E-mail: chifanglu@yahoo.com.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the therapeutic efficacy of dexamethasone administered topically to the round window niche, following acoustic trauma induced by intensive impulse noise, in guinea pigs.

Methods:

Adult, male, albino guinea pigs with a normal Preyer's reflex were exposed to 80 impulse noises (peak value 167 dB, duration 0.5 ms, interval 2 s). Dexamethasone (40 mg/ml) or saline was then topically applied to the round window niche. Each animal's auditory brainstem response was measured before and one day after exposure, and three weeks after topical treatment. Cochlear morphology was examined to assess hair cell loss and spiral ganglion cell damage. To assess oxidative activity, cochlear malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase concentrations were determined three weeks post-treatment. Following topical application, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of dexamethasone in cochlear perilymph were analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results:

Animals receiving dexamethasone showed reduced noise-induced outer hair cell loss (three weeks post-treatment), and significant attenuation of noise-induced auditory brainstem response threshold shifts (one day post-exposure and three weeks post-treatment), compared with controls. There was no difference in spiral ganglion morphology. Animals receiving dexamethasone also showed a significantly lower malondialdehyde concentration and a higher superoxide dismutase concentration, post-exposure. Following topical application, the perilymph dexamethasone level peaked at 5330.522 µg/ml (15 minutes post-treatment), and was 299.797 µg/ml 360 minutes later.

Conclusion:

Topical application of dexamethasone to the round window niche has protective effects against intensive impulse noise induced trauma in the guinea pig cochlea. This drug can diffuse into the inner ear through the round window membrane and persist in the perilymph for a relatively long period. The mechanism of protection may involve an anti-oxidant effect.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Outline of the experimental design. HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Apparatus used for impulse noise exposure.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 The surgical procedure. (a, b) The guinea pig was anaesthetised generally and locally. (c, d) The bulla was exposed and opened under sterile conditions. (e) A gelatin sponge soaked with dexamethasone or saline was gently placed against the round window niche of each left cochlea. (f) Dental cement was used to close the bulla.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Electrode placement for auditory brainstem response measurement.

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Determination of auditory brainstem response thresholds by visual inspection of wave ш.

Figure 5

Fig. 6 Photomicrograph of spiral ganglion cells from experimental group one animal. (H&E; ×400)

Figure 6

Fig. 7 Auditory brainstem response (ABR) click threshold shift observed in the dexamethasone and saline groups (preliminary experiment group one), before (pre) and after (post) treatment. No statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups at either time point.

Figure 7

Fig. 8 Auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold shifts for the noise plus dexamethasone (dex) and noise plus saline groups in pre-experiment group two, and the ABR threshold shift difference between these two groups, following treatment administration. The ABR threshold shift difference increased gradually over weeks one to three, but was no larger on week four. Therefore, week three was chosen as the experimental observation point.

Figure 8

Fig. 9 Auditory brainstem response (ABR) click threshold shifts for the noise plus dexamethasone (dex) and noise plus saline groups in experimental group one, before and after noise exposure. Note that treatment was administered 1 day after noise exposure. A significant difference between the two groups' ABR threshold shifts was observed at both 1 and 21 days after noise exposure (p < 0.05).

Figure 9

Fig. 10 Photomicrographs showing hair cell loss in the inferior part of the second cochlear turn. (a) In the dexamethasone group, it was mainly the outer hair cells which were lost; few inner hair cells were lost. (b) In the saline group, few outer hair cells remained. (Succinate dehydrogenase staining; ×400)

Figure 10

Table I Percentage hair cell loss in each cochlear turn

Figure 11

Fig. 11 Photomicrographs showing spiral ganglion cells in the (a) inferior second turn and (b) superior basal turn in the dexamethasone group; and in the (c) inferior second turn and (d) superior basal turn in the saline group. (H&E; ×400)

Figure 12

Table II Malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase concentration 21 days after treatment

Figure 13

Fig. 12 Cochlear perilymph dexamethasone concentration versus time, in experiment two animals.

Figure 14

Table III Perilymph dexamethasone level over time*