Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T08:16:32.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential emergence of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from on-farm breeding substrates in Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2013

GEOFFREY M. THOMPSON*
Affiliation:
Queen's University of Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
STEPHEN JESS
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
ARCHIE K. MURCHIE
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: F15, Applied Plant Science & Biometrics Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland. Tel: 07854368784. E-mail: Geoffrey.Thompson@afbini.gov.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Biting midges of the genus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are vectors of a number of viral diseases worldwide. Following the unforeseen outbreak of bluetongue in northern Europe (2006–2009) there was a need to clarify on-farm breeding substrates utilized by temperate Culicoides spp. Six substrates (cow dung, cow slurry, horse dung, sheep dung, maize silage and soil) were investigated for Culicoides spp. emergence over a 31-week period. Overall, most Obsoletus group Culicoides emerged from the cow dung and the most Pulicaris group Culicoides emerged from the sheep dung. Furthermore, Culicoides of the Obsoletus group were found to be abundant in cow slurry and sheep dung. Temperature played a significant role in the emergence times of adult Culicoides. The Obsoletus group appear to have undergone 3 generations during the experimental period. The sex ratio of emergent Obsoletus group Culicoides was affected by substrate type, with a greater proportion of males emerging from cow dung and slurry compared with the other substrates.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a bucket emergence trap.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Overall mean number of adult Culicoides captured from 300 mL of substrate over the duration of experiment (± standard error of the mean). (A) Obsoletus group, (B) Pulicaris group. Bars with different lower case letters are significantly different according to LSDs derived from ANOVA.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Mean number of adult Culicoides captured from 300 mL of substrate after initial 4-week period under bucket emergence traps in the field (± standard error of the mean). (A) Obsoletus group, (B) Pulicaris group. Bars with different lower case letters are significantly different according to LSDs derived from ANOVA.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Mean number of adult Culicoides captured from 300 mL of substrate following a 4-week incubation at 20 °C (± standard error of the mean). (A) Obsoletus group, (B) Pulicaris group. Bars with different lower case letters are significantly different according to LSDs derived from ANOVA.

Figure 4

Table 1. Sex ratio of adult Culicoides belonging to the Obsoletus and Pulicaris groups emerging from different substrate types from 4 May to 28 December 2011

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Weekly mean number of adult Culicoides captured from 300 mL of cow and sheep dung over the duration of experiment (confidence limits removed for clarity). (A) Obsoletus group, (B) Pulicaris group. Dashed vertical line indicates dates cattle were treated with Cydectin® pour-on.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Proportion of total adult Culicoides emerging weekly from within bucket emergence traps and biobags compared to average weekly maximum temperature (°C). (A) Obsoletus group, (B) Pulicaris group.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Total number of adult Obsoletus (left axis) and Pulicaris group (right axis) caught per night using an Onderstepoort UV light suction trap. All other groups excluded for clarity.