Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:29:07.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nosocomial Outbreak of Upper Respiratory Tract Infection With β-Lactamase-Negative Ampicillin-Resistant Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2018

Reiko Miyahara,
Motoi Suzuki,
Konosuke Morimoto,
Bin Chang,
Sayaka Yoshida,
Shiori Yoshinaga,
Miki Kitamura,
Mikiko Chikamori,
Kazunori Oishi and
Tatsuhiko Kitamura
...Show all authors
Reiko Miyahara
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, JapanDepartment of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Motoi Suzuki*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Konosuke Morimoto
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Bin Chang
Affiliation:
National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
Sayaka Yoshida
Affiliation:
Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan
Shiori Yoshinaga
Affiliation:
Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan
Miki Kitamura
Affiliation:
Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan
Mikiko Chikamori
Affiliation:
Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan
Kazunori Oishi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
Tatsuhiko Kitamura
Affiliation:
Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan
Masayuki Ishida
Affiliation:
Chikamori Hospital, Kochi, Japan
*
Address correspondence to Motoi Suzuki, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Japan, 852-852 (mosuzuki@nagasaki-u.ac.jp).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiologic features of an outbreak of an acute respiratory tract infection (ARI) caused by β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) in an acute-care ward.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional case-control study.

SETTING

An acute-care ward (ward A) in a general hospital of Kochi in western Japan.

METHODS

Patients who shared a room with an index patient and all staff in ward A were screened and followed from July 1 to August 31, 2015. Sputum or throat swab samples were collected from participants and tested by culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The association between detected pathogens and ARI development among all participants was examined. A case-control study was conducted to identify risk factors for disease.

RESULTS

In total, 78 participants, including the index patient, were enrolled. Of all participants, 27 (34.6%) developed mild respiratory symptoms during a 3-week period: 24 were diagnosed as upper respiratory tract infections, and 3 were diagnosed as lower respiratory tract infections. The presence of BLNAR NTHi was confirmed in 13 participants, and multilocus sequence typing demonstrated that these isolates belonged to sequence type 159. All isolates showed identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. The presence of BLNAR NTHi was strongly associated with ARI development, whereas viruses were not associated with the disease. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that a history of contact with the index patient was independently associated with ARI caused by BLNAR NTHi.

CONCLUSIONS

BLNAR NTHi has the potential to cause upper respiratory tract infections among adults and to spread rapidly in hospital settings.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:652–659

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 39 , Issue 6 , June 2018, pp. 652 - 659
Copyright
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is an important pathogenReference Van Eldere, Slack, Ladhani and Cripps 1 that causes otitis media in childrenReference Cilveti, Olmo and Pérez-Jove 2 and lower respiratory tract infections (LRIs), including exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in adults.Reference Wilkinson, Aris and Bourne 3 Nontypeable H. influenzae is less virulent than encapsulated serotypesReference Agrawal and Murphy 4 ; however, after the introduction of H. influenzae type b (Hib) conjugative vaccines, the burden of invasive NTHi disease has increased among older people.Reference Dworkin, Park and Borchardt 5 – Reference Van Wessel, Rodenburg, Veenhoven, Spanjaard, van der Ende and Sanders 7 Furthermore, the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strains, such as the β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strain, is posing a threat to public health, especially in East Asian countries such as Japan.Reference Yanagihara, Kadota and Aoki 8

Nontypeable H. influenzae is a commensal pathogen of the upper respiratory tract that is common in the general population. The proportion of NTHi carriage varies depending on the geographical area and risk of exposure: NTHi colonizes 9.4%–87.1% of childrenReference Oikawa, Ishiwada and Takahashi 9 – Reference Smith-Vaughan, Beissbarth and Bowman 12 and 18%–30% of adults.Reference Mackenzie, Leach, Carapetis, Fisher and Morris 13 – Reference Hammitt, Akech and Morpeth 15 Although NTHi carriers are normally asymptomatic, a human nasopharyngeal colonization study demonstrated that in healthy adults, the acquisition of NTHi results in upper respiratory tract symptoms.Reference Winokur, Chaloner, Doern, Ferreira and Apicella 16 Nontypeable H. influenzae can be transmitted human to human through respiratory droplets. Therefore, NTHi may cause an outbreak of upper respiratory tract infection (URI) in crowded settings. However, evidence of NTHi URI outbreaks is scarce, which may be because establishing a causal association between the detection of NTHi from upper respiratory tract samples and URI symptoms is difficult.

In July 2015, an outbreak of acute respiratory infection (ARI) was identified in an acute-care hospital in Kochi, Japan. We conducted an intensive epidemiological investigation and found that this outbreak was caused by a BLNAR NTHi strain.

Description of Outbreak

The hospital is located in the center of Kochi in western Japan and provides primary, secondary, and tertiary care for residents. On July 1, 2015, 4 nurses working in an acute-care ward (ward A) developed acute upper respiratory symptoms and reported them to the hospital. The hospital infection control team (ICT) initiated an investigation and identified a male patient, aged 96 years, who had been hospitalized in ward A with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia with fever, chills, and respiratory symptoms since June 18 (index patient). The patient initially improved after antibiotic treatment but redeveloped fever, cough, and sputum on June 29. According to the hospital laboratory record, sputum samples were collected from the index patient on June 18 and 29, and their cultures yielded Haemophilus influenzae. The ICT also identified 4 patients with respiratory symptoms who had been hospitalized in the same room as the index patient and an additional 4 nurses in ward A who had developed respiratory symptoms after the admission of the index patient. The ICT immediately reported this event to the Kochi Municipal Health Center and initiated an intensive epidemiological investigation and intervention in collaboration with the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University (ITM-NU) and National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID).

METHODS

Outbreak Investigation and Study Population

The outbreak investigation was conducted from July 1 to August 31, 2015, through prospective surveillance and retrospective data collection. We targeted all patients who had been hospitalized in the same room with the index patient and all medical staff and nursing students who had been working in ward A. Participants provided sputum or throat swab samples at the time of the interview. Chest x-rays of symptomatic participants were interpreted by an expert pulmonologist. Participants were asked to report if any symptoms developed after the initial survey until the end of the follow-up period (August 31).

Participants were diagnosed as ARI if they had developed any of the following symptoms: cough, sneezing, sputum, sore throat, or respiratory distress. Among ARI cases, participants were diagnosed as lower respiratory tract infection (LRI) if their sputum samples yielded causative bacteria or their chest x-rays demonstrated infiltrate shadows; otherwise they were diagnosed as URI. Participants were considered as contacts of the index patient if they shared a room with the index patient or cared for the index patient. The contacts of the index patient were identified using the nursing duty roster and bed management records.

Study Design

We conducted 2 analyses to identify a causative agent and risk factors for disease. First, to verify BLNAR NTHi as a cause of this ARI outbreak, we performed a cross-sectional study to examine the association between detected pathogens and ARI among all participants. Second, we conducted a case-control study to identify the risk factors for ARI caused by BLNAR NTHi. Cases were participants with ARI whose culture yielded BLNAR NTHi, and controls were participants without ARI whose culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay did not yield any bacterial pathogens.

Microbiological Methods

Nasopharyngeal and sputum samples were cultured in the hospital laboratory. Haemophilus influenzae identification and the β-lactamase test were performed using the ID Test HN 20 Rapid Kit (Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan). The antibiotic susceptibility test was performed with the broth microdilution method using Dryplate Eiken DP34 (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were transported to ITM-NU for PCR testing. DNA and RNA were extracted from the samples using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and QIA viral RNA minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), respectively. In-house multiplex PCR assays were performed to detect 3 bacterial pathogens (the omp p6 gene of H. influenzae, the lytA gene of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and the copB gene of Moraxella catarrhalis) and 13 respiratory viruses (influenza A, influenza B, RSV, hMPV, PIV-1, PIV-2, PIV-3, PIV-4, rhinovirus, coronavirus, adenovirus, and bocavirus) as described previously.Reference Yoshida, Suzuki and Yamamoto 17 Haemophilus influenzae isolates were sent to NIID for serotyping and genotyping. Serotypes of the H. influenzae isolates were identified by coagulation using antiserum purchased from Denka Seiken (Tokyo, Japan). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on isolates to determine genetic relatedness. To determine genetic similarity, the band-based similarity coefficients were calculated using Dice’s formula: 2h/a+b, where h is the number of matching bands and a+b is the total number of bands being compared.Reference Dice 18 The DNA was digested with SmaI (Takara Shuzo, Shiga, Japan). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed by the DNA sequencing of 7 housekeeping genes: adk, atpG, frdB, fucK, mdh, pgi, and recA.Reference Meats, Feil and Stringer 19 Sequence types (ST) were determined using the H. influenzae MLST website (http://haemlphilus.mlst.net).

Statistical Analysis

An epidemic curve of the symptomatic participants was generated according to the date of onset by their occupation type. As the index case redeveloped respiratory symptoms after antibiotic treatment, its date of onset was shown twice in the epidemic curve. The microbiological test results were compared between participants with and without ARI using simple tabulations and χ2 tests. For the case-control study, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression models. All analyses were performed using Stata version 14.0 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Ethics

The Institutional Review Board of Chikamori Hospital (Kochi, Japan) approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from each survey participant at the time of data and sample collection.

RESULTS

Case Characteristics and Epidemiological Risk Factors

A total of 78 participants, including the index patient, were enrolled in the outbreak investigation. Of these, 47 (60.3%) were female, and the median age was 43 years (range, 20–97 years). Moreover, 19 were hospitalized patients, 31 were nurses, and 28 were other co-medical staff. Of all 78 participants, 27 (34.6%) reported respiratory symptoms during the investigation time. The epidemic curve of the ARI cases is shown in Figure 1. After the index patient had been hospitalized on June 18, the number of symptomatic participants gradually increased, reached its peak on June 28, and declined thereafter. Most ARI cases showed mild respiratory symptoms (Figure 2). Cough and sore throat were the leading symptoms, followed by fever and fatigue. Among 27 participants with ARI, 24 were diagnosed as URI, and 3 participants (including the index patient) were diagnosed as LRI. No one died during the follow-up period.

FIGURE 1

Epidemic curve of acute respiratory infection cases (N=27).

FIGURE 2

Symptoms of acute respiratory infection by Haemophilus influenzae infection status (N=27). Number (percentage) are shown.

Microbiological Findings

In total, 3 sputum samples and 74 throat swab samples were collected from 77 participants, including 26 ARI cases. Nontypeable H. influenzae was identified by culture in 15 individuals: 3 from sputum samples and 12 from throat samples. Of 15 NTHi isolates, 13 were BLNAR and showed indistinguishable antibiotic-resistance patterns (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]: ampicillin, 4 µg/mL; cefazolin, >2 µg/mL; ceftriaxone, 0.25 µg/mL; meropenem, 0.25 µg/mL) (Supplementary Table 1). Furthermore, 13 NTHi isolates showed identical PFGE patterns (Figure 3). One isolate (no. 10) showed 1 band difference that corresponded to the Dice similarity coefficient of 0.96 and was classified as an identical isolate. The MLST results showed that these isolates belonged to sequence type 159.

FIGURE 3

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the SmaI restriction fragments of the Haemophilus influenzae isolates. Lanes 1–10 and 13–15: H. influenzae isolates from the study participants. Lanes AHI31 and AHI33: H. influenzae isolates from invasive disease cases that were unrelated to the outbreak. Lanes 11–12: H. parainfluenzae isolates from the study participants. NOTE. M, molecular size marker.

Respiratory samples were further tested for bacterial and viral pathogens with PCR assays. Overall, 15 individuals tested positive for H. influenzae: 11 were positive by both culture and PCR, and 4 were negative by culture. Viruses were detected in 24 individuals (31.2%): human rhinovirus (HRV; N=18, 23.4%) was the leading virus detected, followed by influenza A (N=13, 16.9%). Viral-bacterial codetection was observed in 10 individuals; 2 individuals were positive for a virus (adenovirus and HMPV) and were culture positive for H. influenzae (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Microbiological Characteristics of the Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) (N=77)

NOTE. ARI, acute respiratory infection; BLNAR, β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant; PCR, polymerase chain reaction assay.

a P values were determined using the χ2 test.

The detection rate of BLNAR NTHi was substantially higher among participants with ARI (46.2%) than those without ARI (2.0%) (Table 1). Haemophilus parainfluenzae and viruses were not associated with ARI.

Assessment of the Risk of ARI Caused by BLNAR NTHi

In the univariate analysis, the history of contact with the index patient and smoking were strongly associated with the development of ARI by BLNAR NTHi (Table 2). The multivariate analysis found that the history of contact with the index patient was independently associated with symptom development by BLNAR NTHi (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 31.31; 95% CI, 2.47–397.71).

TABLE 2

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis for Risk Factor Causing the β-Lactamase-Negative Ampicillin-Resistant (BLNAR) Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) Outbreak

NOTE. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AOR, adjusted odds ratio.

a Case patients had ARI and cultures positive for BLANR NTHi.

b Control patients had no acute respiratory infection and were culture negative and PCR negative for NTHi.

c Odds ratio adjusting for sex, age, occupation, contact with the index case and smoking status.

d P values were tested using the likelihood-ratio test.

Control Measures

The ICT implemented the following infection control measures: contact precautions, reemphasis of hand hygiene, and close observation of compliance with infection control practices. Hospital staff who developed ARI were requested to wear surgical masks or stay home until their symptoms resolved. In total, 9 NTHi culture-positive participants with respiratory symptoms were treated with levofloxacin or ceftriaxone. Follow-up nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected from 6 participants after the treatment, and no participant was culture positive for NTHi. No new case was noted from July 11 to August 31.

DISCUSSION

This nosocomial ARI outbreak among patients and healthcare workers was caused by the BLNAR NTHi strain. Most patients developed URI, and the transmission occurred rapidly without causing severe disease in the hospital setting. The strong association between the exposure to the index patient and symptom development indicated that the main source of transmission was a single patient. The high prevalence of BLNAR NTHi among our patients (46.2%) and the identical microbiological pattern implied that BLNAR NTHi caused the outbreak transmitted from the index case. Our findings suggest that some drug-resistant NTHi strains can efficiently spread among adults in crowded settings.

Although NTHi is a known cause of respiratory infections, such as otitis media and pneumonia,Reference Van Eldere, Slack, Ladhani and Cripps 1 – Reference Wilkinson, Aris and Bourne 3 its potential to cause a nosocomial URI outbreak is not fully understood. Andersson et alReference Andersson, Resman and Eitrem 20 reported an outbreak of NTHi that occurred in a long-term care facility for the elderly in Sweden. According to their report, “7 of the 11 residents in a long-term care facility were colonized with NTHi, 4 of them were hospitalized, and a fifth resident died from pneumonia.”Reference Andersson, Resman and Eitrem 20 Another study from Taiwan reported that 12 patients in a respiratory care ward with a 36-bed capacity had developed pneumonia caused by NTHi.Reference Yang, Chen and Wang 21 These findings suggest that some NTHi strains have potential to cause pneumonia outbreaks among high-risk patients in crowded settings. In contrast to previous outbreak reports, in this outbreak, a BLNAR NTHi strain caused URI and spread rapidly among healthy healthcare workers.Reference Goetz, O’Brien, Musser and Ward 22 – Reference Hekker, van der Schee and Kempers 24 Smoking and underlying respiratory diseases are also associated with NTHi infections among adults; however, this association was not observed in the current outbreak. The explanation for the differences in disease severity and transmissibility in this BLNAR NTHi outbreak and previous outbreaks might be 2-fold. First, in Japan, the prevalence of BLNAR strains is particularly high, having increased from 26.7% in 2010 to 33.5% in 2015, as documented by the nationwide surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria respiratory pathogens among adults.Reference Yanagihara, Kadota and Aoki 8 , Reference Niki, Hanaki and Matsumoto 25 In our setting, the prevalence of BLNAR was >40% in 2015 (data not shown). Some BLNAR strains circulating among the Japanese population might have a higher transmissibility than other NTHi strains.Reference Watanabe, Hoshino and Sugita 26 Second, in this outbreak, we identified ST159 from all NTHi cases. ST159 has been associated with COPD and has been predominantly detected in the respiratory tracts of a hospitalized group of older age (>50 years).Reference Murphy, Lesse, Kirkham, Zhong, Sethi and Munson 27 , Reference Skaare, Anthonisen and Caugant 28 According to Andersson et al,Reference Andersson, Resman and Eitrem 20 the NTHi isolates identified in the pneumonia outbreak in Sweden were ST14. The transmissibility and pathogenicity of NTHi may be different by sequence type.

Our risk-factor analysis demonstrated that exposure to the index patient, such as being in the same room with the index patient or caring for the index patient, was strongly associated with symptom development. However, no medical devices, such as a spirometer or medication nebulizer, were shared among our participants, as previously reported,Reference Gough, Kraak, Anderson, Nichols, Slack and McGhie 29 , Reference Sturm, Mostert, Rouing and Van Klingeren 30 Furthermore, although healthcare workers increase the risk of respiratory infections in hospital settings, as previous outbreak reports have noted,Reference Andersson, Resman and Eitrem 20 , Reference Kuster, Shah and Coleman 31 the risk of BLNAR NTHi ARI was similar between healthcare workers and patients. These findings suggested that this NTHi outbreak was caused by person-to-person transmission through direct contact or respiratory droplets. To control for NTHi transmission in hospital settings, the importance of hand hygiene and the use of medical masks when healthcare workers care for patients, especially those who have respiratory symptoms, should be emphasized. The effects of other preventive measures, such as vaccination, need further study.

Generally, URIs are highly associated with respiratory virusesReference Lu, Tong and Pei 32 and increase the risk of bacterial infections. According to a previous study, viral infections of the upper respiratory tract increase the risk of secondary bacterial infection and the bacterial density.Reference Thors, Christensen, Morales-Aza, Vipond, Muir and Finn 33 In addition, previous studies have associated bacterial and viral coinfection with higher morbidity and mortality among childrenReference Klugman, Chien and Madhi 34 and people with underlying respiratory diseases.Reference Wilkinson, Aris and Bourne 3 Although our study detected viruses in the upper respiratory tracts of 24 of 77 of the individuals (31.2%) and viral coinfection in the respiratory tracts of 10 of 77 of the individuals (13.0%), no association was observed between virus detection status and URI development. However, considering the high rate of bacterial colonization (66%–72.3%) and viral coinfection (4.3%–22%) observed among asymptomatic healthcare workers,Reference Raina MacIntyre, Chughtai and Zhang 35 , Reference Hassoun, Huff and Weisman 36 the transmission risk of bacteria due to viral coinfection among nasopharyngeal bacteria may need to be considered. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism of NTHi transmission and the role of viruses in hospital settings.

This outbreak investigation has several limitations. First, although the investigation was initiated immediately after the identification of the outbreak, some clinical data were collected retrospectively. The symptoms collecting by interview might have introduced recall bias. However, the information on the contact with the index patient was collected objectively, based on the work records, so the epidemiological linkage with the index patient was confirmed without recall bias. Second, some sputum and nasopharyngeal samples were collected 1 week after the start of symptoms. No one took antibiotics for their symptoms before the outbreak investigation commenced, so the bacterial load would not have changed via medication. However, the prevalence of culture positivity might be underestimated. Third, the sample size may be too small to identify other important risk factors of NTHi transmission, such as age and smoking status.

In this report, we demonstrated that a BLNAR NTHi strain caused a URI outbreak in an acute-care hospital. BLNAR NTHi has potential to cause URI among healthy adults and spread rapidly in hospital settings. Considering its high prevalence in the population of East Asia, we should reconsider the importance of implementing existing infectious control measures for BLNAR NTHi, and we should seek to establish new preventive methods, such as vaccination.Reference Murphy 37

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all patients and hospital staff who participated in the study. We also thank Rina Shiramizu and Kyoko Uchibori (Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan) for performing PCR assays.

Financial support: This study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan (grant no. H28 Shinko-Shitei-005), JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. 15K09571), and the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan.

Potential conflicts of interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2018.56

References

REFERENCES

1. Van Eldere, J, Slack, MPE, Ladhani, S, Cripps, AW. Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae, an under-recognised pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:1281–1292.Google Scholar
2. Cilveti, R, Olmo, M, Pérez-Jove, J, et al. Epidemiology of otitis media with spontaneous perforation of the tympanic membrane in young children and association with bacterial nasopharyngeal carriage, recurrences and pneumococcal vaccination in Catalonia, Spain—the prospective HERMES study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0170316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Wilkinson, TMA, Aris, E, Bourne, S, et al. A prospective, observational cohort study of the seasonal dynamics of airway pathogens in the aetiology of exacerbations in COPD. Thorax 2017;72:919–927.Google Scholar
4. Agrawal, A, Murphy, TF. Haemophilus influenzae infections in the H. influenzae type B conjugate vaccine era. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:3728–3732.Google Scholar
5. Dworkin, MS, Park, L, Borchardt, SM. The changing epidemiology of invasive Haemophilus influenzae disease, especially in persons. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Puig, C, Grau, I, Marti, S, Tubau, F, Calatayud, L. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of Haemophilus influenzae causing invasive disease in adult patients. PLoS One. 9(11):e112711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Van Wessel, K, Rodenburg, GD, Veenhoven, RH, Spanjaard, L, van der Ende, A, Sanders, EAM. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae invasive disease in the Netherlands: a retrospective surveillance study 2001–2008. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:e1–e7.Google Scholar
8. Yanagihara, K, Kadota, J, Aoki, N, et al. Nationwide surveillance of bacterial respiratory pathogens conducted by the surveillance committee of Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and the Japanese Society for Clinical Microbiology in 2010: general view of the pathogens’ antibacterial susceptibility. J Infect Chemother 2015;21:410–420.Google Scholar
9. Oikawa, J, Ishiwada, N, Takahashi, Y, et al. Changes in nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis among healthy children attending a day-care centre before and after official financial support for the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and H. influenzae type B vaccine in Japan. J Infect Chemother 2014;20:146–149.Google Scholar
10. Ito, M, Hotomi, M, Maruyama, Y, et al. Clonal spread of beta-lactamase-producing amoxicillin-clavulanate-resistant (BLPACR) strains of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae among young children attending a day care in Japan. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:901–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Navne, JE, Borresen, ML, Slotved, HC, et al. Nasopharyngeal bacterial carriage in young children in Greenland: a population at high risk of respiratory infections. Epidemiol Infect 2016;144:3226–3236.Google Scholar
12. Smith-Vaughan, HC, Beissbarth, J, Bowman, J, et al. Geographic consistency in dominant, non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae genotypes colonising four distinct Australian paediatric groups: a cohort study. Pneumonia (Nathan) 2016;8:13.Google Scholar
13. Mackenzie, GA, Leach, AJ, Carapetis, JR, Fisher, J, Morris, PS. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carriage of respiratory bacterial pathogens in children and adults: cross-sectional surveys in a population with high rates of pneumococcal disease. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:304.Google Scholar
14. Bosch, AATM, van Houten, MA, Bruin, JP, et al. Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and other bacteria in the 7th year after implementation of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the Netherlands. Vaccine 2016;34:531–539.Google Scholar
15. Hammitt, LL, Akech, DO, Morpeth, SC, et al. Population effect of 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in Kilifi, Kenya: findings from cross-sectional carriage studies. Lancet Global Health 2014;2:e397–e405.Google Scholar
16. Winokur, PL, Chaloner, K, Doern, GV, Ferreira, J, Apicella, MA. Safety and immunological outcomes following human inoculation with nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae . J Infect Dis 2013;208:728–738.Google Scholar
17. Yoshida, L-M, Suzuki, M, Yamamoto, T, et al. Viral pathogens associated with acute respiratory infections in central Vietnamese children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;29:75–77.Google Scholar
18. Dice, LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945;26:297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Meats, E, Feil, EJ, Stringer, S, et al. Characterization of encapsulated and noncapsulated Haemophilus influenzae and determination of phylogenetic relationships by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:1623–1636.Google Scholar
20. Andersson, M, Resman, F, Eitrem, R, et al. Outbreak of a beta-lactam resistant non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae sequence type 14 associated with severe clinical outcomes. BMC Infect Dis 2015;15:129.Google Scholar
21. Yang, C-J, Chen, T-C, Wang, C-S, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of biotype I, multidrug-resistant, serologically non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in a respiratory care ward in Taiwan. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:406–409.Google Scholar
22. Goetz, MB, O’Brien, H, Musser, JM, Ward, JI. Nosocomial transmission of disease caused by nontypeable strains of Haemophilus influenzae . Am J Med 1994;96:342–347.Google Scholar
23. Van Dort, M, Walden, C, Walker, ES, Reynolds, SA. An outbreak of infections caused by non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in an extended care facility. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Hekker, T, van der Schee, AC, Kempers, J. A nosocomial outbreak of amoxycillin-resistant non-typable Haemophilus influenzae in a respiratory ward. J Hosp Infect 1991;19:25–31.Google Scholar
25. Niki, Y, Hanaki, H, Matsumoto, T, et al. Nationwide surveillance of bacterial respiratory pathogens conducted by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy in 2008: general view of the pathogens’ antibacterial susceptibility. J Infect Chemother 2011;17:510–523.Google Scholar
26. Watanabe, H, Hoshino, K, Sugita, R, et al. Possible high rate of transmission of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains, between children and their parents. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:362–365.Google Scholar
27. Murphy, TF, Lesse, AJ, Kirkham, C, Zhong, H, Sethi, S, Munson, RS Jr. A Clonal group of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae with Two IgA proteases is adapted to infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS One 2011;6:e25923.Google Scholar
28. Skaare, D, Anthonisen, IL, Caugant, DA, et al. Multilocus sequence typing and ftsI sequencing: a powerful tool for surveillance of penicillin-binding protein 3-mediated beta-lactam resistance in nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae . BMC Microbiol 2014;14:131.Google Scholar
29. Gough, J, Kraak, WA, Anderson, EC, Nichols, WW, Slack, MP, McGhie, D. Cross-infection by nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae . Lancet 1990;336:159–160.Google Scholar
30. Sturm, AW, Mostert, R, Rouing, P, Van Klingeren, B. Outbreak of multiresistant non-encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae infections in a pulmonary rehabilitation centre. Lancet 1990;335:214–216.Google Scholar
31. Kuster, SP, Shah, PS, Coleman, BL, et al. Incidence of influenza in healthy adults and healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2011;6:e26239.Google Scholar
32. Lu, Y, Tong, J, Pei, F, et al. Viral aetiology in adults with acute upper respiratory tract infection in Jinan, Northern China. Clin Dev Immunol 2013;2013:869521–869527.Google ScholarPubMed
33. Thors, V, Christensen, H, Morales-Aza, B, Vipond, I, Muir, P, Finn, A. The effects of live attenuated influenza vaccine on nasopharyngeal bacteria in healthy 2 to 4 year olds: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:1401–1409.Google Scholar
34. Klugman, KP, Chien, Y-W, Madhi, SA. Pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza: a deadly combination. Vaccine 2009;27(Suppl 3):C9–C14.Google Scholar
35. Raina MacIntyre, C, Chughtai, AA, Zhang, Y, et al. Viral and bacterial upper respiratory tract infection in hospital health care workers over time and association with symptoms. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17:553.Google Scholar
36. Hassoun, A, Huff, MD, Weisman, D, et al. Seasonal variation of respiratory pathogen colonization in asymptomatic health care professionals: a single-center, cross-sectional, 2-season observational study. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:865–870.Google Scholar
37. Murphy, TF. Vaccines for nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: the future is now. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2015;22:459–466.Google Scholar
Figure 0

FIGURE 1Epidemic curve of acute respiratory infection cases (N=27).

Figure 1

FIGURE 2Symptoms of acute respiratory infection by Haemophilus influenzae infection status (N=27). Number (percentage) are shown.

Figure 2

FIGURE 3Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the SmaI restriction fragments of the Haemophilus influenzae isolates. Lanes 1–10 and 13–15: H. influenzae isolates from the study participants. Lanes AHI31 and AHI33: H. influenzae isolates from invasive disease cases that were unrelated to the outbreak. Lanes 11–12: H. parainfluenzae isolates from the study participants. NOTE. M, molecular size marker.

Figure 3

TABLE 1Microbiological Characteristics of the Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) (N=77)

Figure 4

TABLE 2Univariate and Multivariate Analysis for Risk Factor Causing the β-Lactamase-Negative Ampicillin-Resistant (BLNAR) Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) Outbreak

Supplementary material: File

Miyahara et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Miyahara et al. supplementary material(File)
File 131.9 KB