Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T13:40:57.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The anthropology and history of rock art in the Lower Congo inperspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Geoffroy Heimlich*
Affiliation:
Institut des Mondes Africains, UMR 8171 (CNRS)—UMR 243 (IRD), Centre Malher, 9 rue Malher, 75004 Paris, France; and Rock Art Research Institute, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Braamfontein 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa (Email: geoffroy.heimlich@orange.fr)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rock art of the Lovo Massif region in the Lower Congo offers afascinating and understudied example of artistic traditions, some of whichpredate the period of European contact. The first extensive, systematicsurvey of the region has identified key aspects of these rock arttraditions, and has obtained radiocarbon dates that facilitate newinterpretations of the relationship between the rock art and the historicalkingdom of Kongo. Multiple perspectives are used to integrateanthropological, historical and archaeological data with stories from localmythology to show how the significance of this art has evolved over time. Asa result of this study, the unique cultural heritage of the Lovo Massif rockart has been put forward for protection under the UNESCO World Heritagelist.

Information

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of the Lovo Massif (modified after Cooksey et al. 2013).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map of the rock art sites studied in the Lovo Massif. The red circles indicate the rock art sites, while the black circles indicate villages. The sites of Fwakumbi and Ngembo are not shown as they are located in a neighbouring area.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The main image types associated with the four groups of rock art identified in the Lovo Massif area. Groups A, B and C appear to be variants of the same stylistic Kongo tradition, while group D appears more distinct.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Map showing distribution of group D rock art with higher-density areas in red.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Direct radiocarbon dates for the rock art: presentation of probability densities of age (in AD) after calibration in OxCal v4.2 using the SHCal13 calibration curve (Bronk Ramsey 2009; Hogg et al. 2013).

Figure 5

Table 1. Results of the radiocarbon dating of the pigment samples, with calibrated calendar ages. Dates calibrated in OxCal v4.2 using the SHCal13 calibration curve (Bronk Ramsey 2009; Hogg et al. 2013).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Ceramic vessel from Tovo Cave (photograph by G. Heimlich).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Crucifix from the church of Ngongo Mbata (photograph by G. Heimlich).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Art within the decorated cave of Ntadi Ntadi, depicting three cruciform Kongo crosses, a lizard-like shape and a gridded pattern (photograph by G. Heimlich).

Figure 9

Figure 9. Tracing of a santu cross at the rock art site of Ndimbankondo I (photograph by G. Heimlich).

Figure 10

Figure 10. Santu cross used in rituals (photograph by J. Van de Vyver, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren © 2016).