Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:30:37.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Circumbinary habitability niches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2014

Paul A. Mason*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA Department of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, New Mexico State University – DACC, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
Jorge I. Zuluaga
Affiliation:
FACom – Instituto de Física – FCEN, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia
Pablo A. Cuartas-Restrepo
Affiliation:
FACom – Instituto de Física – FCEN, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia
Joni M. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, New Mexico State University – DACC, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
*
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Binaries could provide the best niches for life in the Galaxy. Although counterintuitive, this assertion follows directly from stellar tidal interaction theory and the evolution of lower mass stars. There is strong evidence that chromospheric activity of rapidly rotating young stars may be high enough to cause mass loss from atmospheres of potentially habitable planets. The removal of atmospheric water is most critical. Tidal breaking in binaries could help reduce magnetic dynamo action and thereby chromospheric activity in favour of life. We call this the Binary Habitability Mechanism (BHM) that we suggest allows for water retention at levels comparable to or better than the Earth. We discuss novel advantages that life may exploit, in these cases, and suggest that life may even thrive on some circumbinary planets. We find that while many binaries do not benefit from BHM, high-quality niches do exist for various combinations of stars between 0.55 and 1.0 solar masses. For a given pair of stellar masses, BHM operates only for certain combinations of period and eccentricity. Binaries having a solar-type primary seem to be quite well-suited niches having wide and distant habitable zones with plentiful water and sufficient light for photosynthetic life. We speculate that, as a direct result of BHM, conditions may be suitable for life on several planets and possibly even moons of giant planets orbiting some binaries. Lower mass combinations, while more restrictive in parameter space, provide niches lasting many billions of years and are rich suppliers of photosynthetic photons. We provide a publicly available web-site (http://bit.ly/BHM-calculator or http://bit.ly/BHM-calculator-mirror), which calculates the BHM effects presented in this paper.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Table 1. Selected binary habitability niches. Here the masses of the primary and secondary are M1 and M2, respectively, q = M2/M1, ebin and Pbin are the eccentricity and period of the binary system, acrit is the critical distance for orbital stability, CHZin and CHZout are the inner and outer edges of the circumbinary CHZ and ηXUV;SW are the asymptotic time-integrated XUV and SW fluxes (see Eq. (1)). We compare the integrated fluxes when the BHM is operating and when we assume it is not. In cases for which the calculated CHZin is greater than the critical limit (N10, N11 and N12), the CHZin is set to be equal to the critical stability limit (values in boldface)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Evolution of the habitable zone around a single solar-mass star (dashed lines) and solar twins (continuous lines) of niche N1. The masses of the primary and secondary are M1 and M2, respectively, abin is the semi-major axis of the binary, e is the binary eccentricity, and Pbin is the orbital period of the binary. The semi-major axis of the planet, a, is plotted as a function of the age of the system, τ. The stars are considered to be coevol. At τ=10 Gyr, the primary star abandons the main sequence. The position of the inner edge of the HZ at this time defines the innermost limit of the CHZ. Since the vertical scale is logarithmic, the width of the single-star CHZ and the circumbinary CHZ are shaded and appear equal, but do not overlap. However, the circumbinary CHZ ranges from CHZin=1.57 AU to CHZin=2.18 AU, whereas the single CHZ goes from 1.11 to 1.53 AU, i.e. the circumbinary CHZ of N1 is 45% wider and 42% more distant than in the single-star case.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. The CHZ for selected binary systems, N1, N6, N7 and N9 are shown. The vertical axes are all shown on the same scale for easy comparison. The top two panels (niches N1 and N6) contain solar-mass primaries. For maximum longevity, those planets should reside at distances that are greater than the middle of the CHZ (shaded region). On the other hand, the bottom two panels (niches N7 and N9), involve lower mass primaries with planets optimally positioned at the inner edge of the CHZ. The horizontal scales and the corresponding CHZ limits for lower mass primaries are based on a final age of 12.5 Gyr, based on the age of the Galaxy. See the text for more details.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Time-integrated XUV (left) and SW (right) fluxes on the CHZ of solar twins (niche 1), shown including BHM (solid lines) and without BHM (dashed lines). For comparison purposes we have included the same quantity calculated in the CHZ of a solar-mass single star (single primary, dotted lines) and more specifically at the Earth distance (thick solid line). Note that in both cases the inner CHZ with no BHM is slightly below Earth values, this is because the Earth is closer to the Sun than the solar inner CHZ, which is at 1.1 AU.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Stellar rotation period evolution for niches N1, N6, N7 and N9; the same examples as those shown in Fig. 2. These models include both the tidal synchronization torque of the binary and the standard single-star mass-loss torque. The left two panels show 1.0 and 0.85 M⊙ twins, so the stellar components evolve to the same period at the same time. The right panels show two different mass ratios and one can see that the primary synchronizes first and in cases with higher eccentricity, such as N9, in the bottom right panel, the primary pseudo-synchronizes well short of the binary period, whereas the secondary synchronizes at a rotational period that is few days longer than the binary period.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Stellar XUV evolution for niches N1, N6, N7 and N9; the same examples as those shown in Figs 2 and 4. In each case, there is an early decrease in XUV flux. The effect of strong tidal breaking (see Fig. 1) on XUV emission during first Gyr is clear as the XUV flux drops precipitously. Tidal breaking results in a total integrated XUV flux significantly less than that incident on the Earth at all points within the CHZ (see Table 1).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Atmospheric mass loss for circumbinary planets in niches N1, N6, N7, N9 (the same niches as those presented in Figs 2, 4 and 5) at the inner edge of the CHZ are shown as a function of planetary mass. The corresponding estimate for the Earth is shown for reference. In each of these cases, mass loss for an Earth-like planet is less than that experienced by the Earth at all points within the circumbinary HZ.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. In the left panel, planetocentric coordinates (in AU) are used to show changes in distance between the planet and the two stars of niche N9. The primary is shown in yellow and the secondary is shown in red. Two planets, with circular orbits, at the inner and outer CHZ limits are shown. In the right panel, the insolation (black) and the PPFD (red for the inner planet and blue for the outer planet) are shown in Earth equivalent units. The PPFD curve is higher than the insolation curve for both planets. Specifically, notice that the inner CHZ planet has an insolation about the same as the Earth, while the PPFD is significantly higher.