Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T05:01:18.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Trichoderma strains and nitrogen fertilisation impact on Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2025

Emel Topçu
Affiliation:
Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
Nurver Altun*
Affiliation:
Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
Leyla Kılcı
Affiliation:
Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
Şengül Alpay Karaoğlu
Affiliation:
Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
Özlem Faiz
Affiliation:
Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Chemistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Nurver Altun; Email: nurver.altun@erdogan.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae feed on Buxus. It is considered to be the most critical pest of boxwood trees. This study investigated whether different strains of Trichoderma harzianum had an effect on the biocontrol of larvae feeding on boxwood leaves whose nitrogen content was varied by fertilisation. Larvae were collected while feeding on boxwood seedlings in Rize parks and gardens in June 2021. In addition, G1 (no fertilisation), G2 (1.55%), and G5 (1.67%) leaves with different nitrogen concentrations obtained by nitrogen fertilisation were also used as food. As biocontrol agents, ID11D and YP1A strains of T. harzianum were applied in three doses: 50, 100, and 200 μL per water. In total, 21 different groups were created. The nutritional indices of the larvae belonging to the different groups were calculated. In addition, the activities of phenoloxidase, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase activities were measured by taking haemolymph samples. In both strains, the enzyme activities increased with the dose applied. However, it was found that the enzyme activities of the ID11D strain applied were higher than those of the YP1A strain. It can be said that the ID11D strain is effective in controlling C. perspectalis larvae feeding on fertilised boxwood and the YP1A strain is effective in controlling larvae feeding on unfertilised boxwood.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1. Feeding groups set up with larvae fed on leaves containing different concentrations of nitrogen and treated with different doses of different trichoderma strains

Figure 1

Table 2. Nutritional indices formula (Stoyenoff et al., 1994)

Figure 2

Table 3. Nitrogen amounts in leaves ± standard error

Figure 3

Table 4. Correlation coefficients between nutritional indices and enzyme activities of larvae and nitrogen content of the plant and application dose of the treated strain

Figure 4

Figure 1. AD, ECD, and ECI of C. perpectalis larvae treated with different strains trichoderma (a–c) YP1A strain; (d–f) ID11D strain). Note: *Nutritional indices differ among the groups. For AD: YP1A; F = 14.78, df = 11, p < 0.01; for ID11D, F = 11,375, df = 11, p < 0.01. ECD: YP1A; X2 = 163.84, df = 11, p < 0.01; ID11D: X2 = 165.6, df = 11, p < 0.01. ECI: YP1A; X2 = 164.27, df = 11, p < 0.01; ID11D; X2 = 153.91, df = 11, p < 0.01.

Figure 5

Figure 2. RCR and RGR of C. perpectalis larvae treated with different trichoderma strains (a, b) YP1A strain; (c, d) ID11D strain. Note: Values in both strains differ between groups (RCR: YP1A; X2 = 129.38, df = 11, p < 0.01; ID11D; X2 = 144.08, df = 11, p < 0.01); RGR: YP1A; X2 = 149.30, df = 11, p < 0.01; ID11D; X2 = 169.60, df = 11, p < 0.01).

Figure 6

Figure 3. (a) Pupal mass of larvae treated with IYP1A strain (mean ± standard error). (b) Pupal mass of larvae treated with ID11D strain (mean ± standard error). Note: Different letters indicate differences between groups. *p < 0.01.

Figure 7

Figure 4. (a–d) Enzyme activities of larvae treated with YP1A strain (mean ± standard error). Note: *Phenoloxidase: X2 = 177.32, df = 11, p < 0.01. SOD: X2 = 177.30, df = 11, p < 0.01; CAT: X2 = 177.79, df = 11, p < 0.01.

Figure 8

Figure 5. (a–d) Enzyme activities of larvae treated with ID11D strain (mean ± standard error). Note: *Phenoloxidase: X2 = 177.38, df = 11, p < 0.01. SOD: ID11D; X2 = 177.14, df = 11, p < 0.01. CAT: X2 = 175.35, df = 11, p < 0.01.

Figure 9

Table 5. Sun–Sheppard formula-corrected mortality rates of larvae fed in the experimental groups described in table 1