Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:37:14.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rotational grazing management of forage peanut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

Lucas da Rocha Carvalho*
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo (USP), ‘Luiz de Queiroz’ College of Agriculture (ESALQ), Av. Pádua Dias, 11, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
Lilian Elgalise Techio Pereira
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo (USP), Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering (FZEA), Department of Animal Science. Av. Duque de Caxias Norte, 225 – Campus Fernando Costa, CEP 13635-900. Pirassununga, SP, Brazil
Sila Carneiro Da Silva
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo (USP), ‘Luiz de Queiroz’ College of Agriculture (ESALQ), Av. Pádua Dias, 11, CEP 13418-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: lucasrochacarvalho.agro@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The perennial forage peanut is a stoloniferous, perennial tropical legume with potential for use in pastures. Based on the hypothesis that under intermittent stocking herbage accumulation would follow a similar pattern to that described for tropical forage grasses, the objective of this study was to evaluate canopy characteristics and herbage accumulation of forage peanut subjected to strategies of rotational grazing management. Treatments corresponded to all possible combinations of two grazing frequencies (regrowth interrupted at 95% and maximum canopy light interception – LI95% and LIMax) and two grazing severities (post-grazing canopy heights (CHs) equivalent to 40 and 60% of the pre-grazing heights). Treatments were imposed to experimental units during an adaptation period (from November 2014 to January 2015) and the subsequent experimental period lasted from February 2015 to April 2016, comprising two consecutive pasture growing seasons with no interruption between them (summer I to summer II). The pre-grazing targets of LI95% and LIMax corresponded to CHs of 13 and 18 cm, respectively. Forage peanut showed high grazing tolerance as pre-grazing leaf area index (except during summer I and autumn/winter), total herbage, and leaflet dry matter accumulation varied only with seasons. Higher rates of herbage production were recorded during summer I and summer II, followed by those during late and early spring and autumn/winter. Since there was no difference in the pattern of herbage accumulation between LI95% and LIMax and stolons predominated at the bottom of the canopies, forage peanut may be rotationally grazed with greater flexibility than most tropical forage grasses. Recommended pre-grazing CHs are within 13 and 18 cm, and post-grazing heights between 40 and 60% of the pre-grazing height.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Pre-grazing canopy height (CH), herbage mass (HM), and percentage of leaflets (LE) of Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte (mean ± standard error) subjected to strategies of rotational grazing management from November 2014 to April 2016. LI95% and LIMax are grazing frequencies corresponding to grazing at 95% and maximum canopy light interception during regrowth. R40% and R60% are grazing severities corresponding to post-grazing heights equivalent to 40 and 60% of the pre-grazing

Figure 1

Figure 1. Pre-grazing leaf area index (LAI) of Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte subjected to strategies of rotational grazing management from November 2014 to April 2016. LI95% and LIMax are frequencies of defoliation corresponding to grazing at 95% and maximum canopy light interception during regrowth. Bars represent the standard error of the means. Uppercase letters are comparing frequencies of defoliation within seasons of the year. Lowercase letters are comparing seasons of the year within frequencies of defoliation. Means followed by the same letter are not different (p>0.05). Adaptation period = November 10 2014 to February 03, 2015; Summer I = February 04 to April 02, 2015; Autumn/winter = April 03 to September 22, 2015; Early spring = September 23 to November 5, 2015; Late spring = November 06 to December 20, 2015; and Summer II = December 21, 2015 to March 17, 2016.

Figure 2

Table 2. Percentage of stolons at pre-grazing in Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte (mean ± standard error) subjected to strategies of rotational grazing management from November 2014 to April 2016. LI95% and LIMax are grazing frequencies corresponding to grazing at 95% and maximum canopy light interception during regrowth. R40% and R60% are grazing severities corresponding to post-grazing heights equivalent to 40 and 60% of the pre-grazing canopy height

Figure 3

Table 3. Percentage of petioles and dead material at pre-grazing in Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte (mean ± standard error) subjected to strategies of rotational grazing management from November 2014 to April 2016. LI95% and LIMax are grazing frequencies corresponding to grazing at 95% and maximum canopy light interception during regrowth. R40% and R60% are grazing severities corresponding to post-grazing heights equivalent to 40 and 60% of the pre-grazing canopy height

Figure 4

Table 4. Post-grazing leaf area index (LAI) and percentage of leaflets (LE), stolons (S), petioles (PET), and dead material (DDM) of Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte (mean ± standard error) subjected to strategies of rotational grazing management from November 2014 to April 2016. LI95% and LIMax are grazing frequencies corresponding to grazing at 95% and maximum canopy light interception during regrowth. R40% and R60% are grazing severities corresponding to post-grazing heights equivalent to 40 and 60% of the pre-grazing canopy height

Figure 5

Table 5. Total (HARs), leaflet (LAR), and stolon (SARs) accumulation rates of Arachis pintoi cv. Belmonte (mean ± standard error) subjected to strategies of rotational grazing management from February 2015 to April 2016

Supplementary material: File

da Rocha Carvalho et al. supplementary materials

da Rocha Carvalho et al. supplementary materials 1

Download da Rocha Carvalho et al. supplementary materials(File)
File 24.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

da Rocha Carvalho et al. supplementary materials

da Rocha Carvalho et al. supplementary materials 2

Download da Rocha Carvalho et al. supplementary materials(Image)
Image 2.9 MB