Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:55:40.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population genetic structure and Wolbachia infection in an endangered butterfly, Zizina emelina (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae), in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2014

Y. Sakamoto*
Affiliation:
Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
N. Hirai
Affiliation:
Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
T. Tanikawa
Affiliation:
Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
M. Yago
Affiliation:
The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
M. Ishii
Affiliation:
Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
*
* Author for correspondence Phone: +81-29-850-2480 Fax: +81-29-850-2480 E-mail: sakamoto.yoshiko@nies.go.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zizina emelina (de l'Orza) is listed on Japan's Red Data List as an endangered species because of loss of its principal food plant and habitat. We compared parts of the mitochondrial and nuclear genes of this species to investigate the level of genetic differentiation among the 14 extant populations. We also examined infection of the butterfly with the bacterium Wolbachia to clarify the bacterium's effects on the host population's genetic structure. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses revealed that haplotype composition differed significantly among most of the populations, and the fixation index F ST was positively correlated with geographic distance. In addition, we found three strains of Wolbachia, one of which was a male killer; these strains were prevalent in several populations. There was linkage between some host mitochondrial haplotypes and the three Wolbachia strains, although no significant differences were found in a comparison of host mitochondrial genetic diversity with nuclear genetic diversity in Wolbachia-infected or -uninfected populations. These genetic analyses and Wolbachia infection findings show that Z. emelina has little migratory activity and that little gene flow occurs among the current populations.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sites in Japan where Z. emelina was collected. Numbers of individuals collected are given in parentheses. Six regions, defined to separate the distributions by distance, are indicated by open circles (region 1), a closed circle (region 2), an open triangle (region 3), closed triangles (region 4), an open rectangle (region 5), and closed rectangles (region 6).

Figure 1

Table 1. Individuals of Z. emelina collected at 14 geographic locations in Japan.

Figure 2

Table 2. Rates of Wolbachia infection in populations of Z. emelina.

Figure 3

Table 3. Wolbachia infection of female adults of Z. emelina collected from Kamogawa, Sorogawa, Emi, Suita, Kato, and Aioi in 2007, and egg hatchability and sex ratio of their offspring. Number of individuals are in parentheses.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogeny based on the mitochondrial ND5+COI gene sequences (1490 aligned nucleotide sites) of Z. emelina. Bootstrap values of <50% are not shown. Roman numerals (I–VI) indicate the different haplotypes. Zizina otis was used as an outgroup. Wolbachia strains are indicated after the population names. Tn1, wEmeTn1; Tn2, wEmeTn2; Ny1, wEmeNy1.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Haplotype networks for populations, based on the (a) mitochondrial and (b) nuclear gene sequences of Z. emelina. A network with 95% connection limit is shown; the size of each circle reflects the number of individuals with each of the haplotypes. Each haplotype is coloured according to the proportion of individuals in each population (shown in the colour key at right).

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Haplotype networks and Wolbachia infection, based on the (a) mitochondrial and (b) nuclear gene sequences of Z. emelina. A network with 95% connection limit is shown; the size of each circle reflects the number of individuals with each of the haplotypes. Each haplotype is coloured according to the proportion of individuals classified by Wolbachia infection status (shown in the colour key at right).

Figure 7

Table 4. Genetic diversity of mitochondrial haplotypes within populations of Z. emelina.

Figure 8

Table 5. Analysis of molecular variance of mitochondrial and nuclear haplotypes in Z. emelina.

Figure 9

Table 6. Population pairwise FST values based on the frequency and number of different bases in Z. emelina.

Figure 10

Table 7. gional pairwise FST values based on the frequency and number of different bases in Z. emelina.

Figure 11

Fig. 5. Maximum-likelihood phylogeny based on the nuclear Tpi gene sequences (355 aligned nucleotide sites) of Z. emelina. Bootstrap values of <50% are not shown. Letters (A–F) indicate the different haplotypes (see text). Zizina otis was used as an outgroup. Wolbachia strains are indicated after the population names. Tn1, wEmeTn1; Tn2, wEmeTn2; Ny1, wEmeNy1.

Figure 12

Table 8. Genetic diversity of nuclear haplotypes within populations of Z. emelina.

Figure 13

Fig. 6. Relationships between genetic differentiation (FST) and geographic distance among populations of Z. emelina in Honshu and Shikoku, Japan. Geographic distance was measured as the straight-line distance between sites. Each point represents a pair of populations. Solid line, logarithmic regression between FST and distance; dashed line, linear regression between FST and distance. Closed circles, separated by sea; open circles, not separated by sea (a) mitochondrial genetic differentiation; (b) nuclear genetic differentiation

Figure 14

Table 9. Results of HKA testing for mitochondrial and Z-chromosome polymorphism within Z. emelina, and divergence between Z. emelina and Zizina otis.