Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T16:48:02.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative virulence of the fungus Lecanicillium muscarium and two entomopathogenic nematodes against adult truffle beetles (Leiodes cinnamomeus) at low temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2026

Ivan Julià
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecologia. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Autonomous University of Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
Ana Morton
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecologia. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Autonomous University of Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
Anna Garriga
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecologia. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Autonomous University of Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
Fernando Garcia-del-Pino*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecologia. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Autonomous University of Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Fernando Garcia-del-Pino; Email: fernando.garcia@uab.cat
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The truffle beetle, Leiodes cinnamomeus, is the most important pest in black truffle (Tuber melanosporum) plantations during autumn and winter. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are promising biological control agents against L. cinnamomeus, while entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) are also commonly used in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programmes to enhance the control of insect pests. Our aims were to test the virulence of a cold-adapted commercial strain of the EPF Lecanicillium muscarium Ve6 and two EPN species, Steinernema carpocapsae and Steinernema feltiae, against adults of L. cinnamomeus at 15 °C and 10 °C, and to assess the effect of their combined application. Two susceptibility assays were performed using different treatments: (1) immersion of adults in a fungal suspension and (2) direct soil treatment of the EPF. Mortality of L. cinnamomeus was recorded 7 days post-treatment at 15 °C and 15 days post-treatment at 10 °C. Lecanicillium muscarium did not cause significant mortality of L. cinnamomeus. Steinernema feltiae did not cause significant mortality at 15 °C after 7 days but resulted in a statistically significant low mortality (33.3%) at 10 °C after 15 days compared to the control. Steinernema carpocapsae caused the highest mortality rates (63.3–100%) at both temperatures, suggesting it would be the best option to control adults of L. cinnamomeus in field applications. The addition of L. muscarium, did not enhance pest suppression compared to EPNs alone. To optimise IPM strategies for L. cinnamomeus control, further research is recommended to explore potential synergistic effects of combining EPNs with other cold-adapted EPF.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Susceptibility of Leiodes cinnamomeus adults exposed to Lecanicillium muscarium by submersion in conidial suspension and to Steinernema carpocapsae through soil treatment, applied alone or in combination, and to the control at 15 °C for 7 days. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05) at the end of the experiment. LmX1 (L. muscarium at 6 × 106 conidia/mL); LmX2 (L. muscarium at 1 × 107 conidia/mL); Sc10 (S. carpocapsae at 10 IJs/cm2); Sc25 (S. carpocapsae at 25 IJs/cm2).Figure 1 long description.

Figure 1

Table 1. Estimated exposure time to cause 50% mortality (LT50 in days) of Leiodes cinnamomeus adults by the four treatments at 15 °C and 10 °C, with 95% confidence interval (CI). Sc10: Steinernema carpocapsae at 10 IJs/cm2; Sc25: S. carpocapsae at 25 IJs/cm2; LmX1: Lecanicillium muscarium at 6 × 106 conidia/mL; LmX2: L. muscarium at 1 × 107 conidia/mLTable 1 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Susceptibility of Leiodes cinnamomeus adults exposed to Lecanicillium muscarium by submersion in conidial suspension and to Steinernema carpocapsae through soil treatment, applied alone or in combination, and to the control at 10 °C for 15 days. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05) at the end of the experiment. LmX1 (L. muscarium at 6 × 106 conidia/mL); LmX2 (L. muscarium at 1 × 107 conidia/mL); Sc10 (S. carpocapsae at 10 IJs/cm2); Sc25 (S. carpocapsae at 25 IJs/cm2).Figure 2 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Susceptibility of Leiodes cinnamomeus adults exposed via soil treatment to Lecanicillium muscarium (Lm), Steinernema carpocapsae (Sc) and Steinernema feltiae (Sf), alone or in combination, and to the control at 15 °C for 7 days. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05) at the end of the experiment.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Susceptibility of Leiodes cinnamomeus adults exposed via soil treatment to Lecanicillium muscarium (Lm), Steinernema carpocapsae (Sc) and Steinernema feltiae (Sf), alone or in combination, and to the control at 10 °C for 15 days. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05) at the end of the experiment.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 5

Table 2. Estimated exposure time to cause 50% mortality (LT50 in days) of Leiodes cinnamomeus adults by the four treatments at 15 °C and 10 °C, with 95% confidence interval (CI). Sc: Steinernema carpocapsae; Sf: Steinernema feltiae; and Lm: Lecanicillium muscariumTable 2 long description.

Supplementary material: File

Julià et al. supplementary material 1

Julià et al. supplementary material
Download Julià et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 16.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Julià et al. supplementary material 2

Julià et al. supplementary material
Download Julià et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 16.6 KB