1. Introduction
1.1 Biological membranes
Membranes define the physical boundaries of organelles, cells, unicellular organisms, and some viruses. Under a microscope, cell membranes appear to be continuous round or oval containers, which encase their contents, separating them from the external surroundings while providing a mechanism for selective passage of chemicals and signals between the external and internal environments. It is well known that spherical artificial membranes, also known as liposomes, can form spontaneously from phospholipids in water. Although liposomes appear to be superficially similar to biological membranes, membranes extracted from living organisms consist of ~50% protein and 50% lipid by weight. Although compartmentalization can be handled by the phospholipids alone, one-third of the proteins expressed from a typical genome are associated with membranes in order to handle the transport and signaling activities. Understanding membrane proteins demands a structural approach to characterize the factors that influence the atomic resolution structures and dynamics of the proteins and their functions within the phospholipid bilayer environment in which they reside. Because of the liquid crystalline nature of the phospholipid bilayer environment, much of this information is available only from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. This makes studies of membranes among the most meaningful applications of NMR to structural biology.
Structure determination of membrane proteins in general has been hampered by technical difficulties stemming primarily from the preparation of samples suitable for the most widely used methods of structure determination, such as X-ray crystallography and solution NMR spectroscopy. Compared to the more familiar globular proteins, which are generally soluble and crystallizable, membrane proteins are hydrophobic, insoluble in aqueous solution, and difficult to refold into their stable, active conformation. After many years of development, solid-state NMR has matured into an approach fully capable of determining the structures of membrane proteins in their native phospholipid bilayer environment under physiological conditions, and at the present time is the only method with this capability. The initial structures of membrane proteins obtained under near-native conditions are providing a basic understanding of their structures, dynamics, and functions in biological membranes. Along the way, many studies have been performed under a wide variety of sample conditions, the best that could be done at the time, and they have contributed to the development of the spectroscopic methods and have provided background on many issues surrounding the structures and dynamics of these proteins. However, these results have to be interpreted with caution because it is known that non-native environments, such as organic solvents and detergents, can affect the structures and dynamics of membrane proteins.
The characterization of membrane proteins is built on the foundation provided by two of the earliest biophysical chemists, Christian Anfinsen and Charles Tanford. A few of their key ideas are briefly summarized here to provide context for the subsequent applications of NMR spectroscopy to membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayers, which involves the use of many additional layers of technology. Anfinsen (Reference Anfinsen1973) noted that ‘the thermodynamic hypothesis states that the three-dimensional (3D) structure of a native protein in its normal physiological milieu (solvent, pH, ionic strength, presence of other components, such as metal ions or prosthetic groups, temperature, and others) is the one in which the Gibbs free energy of the whole system is lowest; that is, that the native conformation is determined by the totality of interatomic interactions and hence by the amino acid sequence, in a given environment. In terms of natural selection through the design of macromolecules during evolution, this idea emphasized the fact that a protein molecule only makes stable, structural sense when it exists under conditions similar to those for which is was selected – the so-called physiological state.’
Amphipathic molecules, such as phospholipids, form the seamless boundaries of cells and organelles, and the associated proteins control the influx and efflux of metabolites and other biomolecules. This is consistent with the hydrophobic effect, as noted by Tanford (Reference Tanford1978), according to whom ‘the thermodynamics of biological organization does not involve biosynthesis or other chemical transformations, but focuses solely on where molecules prefer to go after they have been synthesized.’
Consistent with these principles, proteoliposomes, protein-containing phospholipid bilayers, are well-characterized and experimentally accessible versions of biological membranes. Although by necessity organic solvents and detergents were used to solubilize membrane proteins for the earliest studies, they violate these tenets, and now that solid-state NMR is providing structures under near-native conditions, many of the structures are found to differ in the non-native environments.
1.2 Biogenesis of membranes
Most discussions about the inception of life following the formation of Earth about 4·5 billion years ago are focused on molecules that evolved into the polymers that store information and carry out chemical processes. However, the emergence of membrane-like barriers to separate these molecules from the surrounding environment was a prerequisite for the formation of self-replicating systems. Membrane-like barriers must have been formed by pre-biotic amphiphiles. Notably, single-cell prokaryotes left fossil evidence dating back 3·4 billion years (Wacey et al. Reference Wacey, Kilbrun, Saunders, Cliff and Brasier2011). The amphipathic molecules that formed primitive membranes in early living systems served to maintain the proximity of a growing number of interacting functional and information-bearing macromolecules in addition to controlling the influx and efflux of metabolites.
The protein-containing membranes of contemporary organisms did not appear fully formed. Like all other aspects of biology, they are the result of billions of years of evolution and are finely tuned for their specialized biological roles. Consequently, abiogenesis includes amphiphiles for membranes which resulted, along with amino acids, nucleic acids, and carbohydrates and their precursors, from the conditions on the early Earth, as mimicked by the classic Miller–Urey experiment (Miller, Reference Miller1953).
The pre-biotic amphiphiles that assembled to form a barrier essential for the start of evolution (Lombard et al. Reference Lombard, Lopez-Garcia and Moreira2012) may bear some resemblance to the amphiphilic compounds used for solubilization and crystallization of membrane proteins. Subsequent co-evolution of proteins and phospholipids resulted in contemporary biological membranes with their unique structural and functional characteristics. Our focus in this review is on structure determination of the proteins that are associated with membranes. For the purpose of structure determination, pre-biotic amphiphiles are a starting point in the search for detergents capable of solubilizing membrane proteins, providing a chemical connection between the earliest membranes and those in mammals. In general, sample preparation and spectroscopic studies of bacterial and human membrane proteins are performed using essentially the same experimental protocols.
1.3 Phospholipid structure
Phospholipids (Cao et al. Reference Cao, Burke and Dennis2013) and proteins are the two principal macromolecular constituents of biological membranes. Some membranes also contain large amounts of cholesterol. The phospholipids found in biological membranes consist of an amphipathic or charged polar head group attached to two long hydrocarbon chains through a tri-substituted glycerol backbone. A wide range of head groups, chain lengths, number of double bonds, and other chemical characteristics are found in biological membranes. In water, phospholipids have negligible concentrations due to their low solubility, and instead, self-assemble to form bilayers, with the polar head groups exposed to water and the long hydrocarbon chains located in the hydrophobic bilayer interior shielded from the polar, aqueous environment. On the molecular scale, these bilayer sheets are infinitely long in two dimensions, but only two molecules thick in the third dimension, which is sufficient to provide a chemical and physical barrier that is so impermeable that it requires proteins to enable ions, small molecules, biopolymers, and signals to cross. Intra- and inter-molecular motions of the phospholipids add to the complexity of the membrane. In addition to their definitive gel to liquid crystalline phase transitions, different lipids have different amplitudes of motion from the surface to the center of the bilayer (Hubbell & McConnell, Reference Hubbell and McConnell1971).
Both the phospholipids and the proteins undergo fast rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal as well as translational diffusion in the plane of the bilayer and occasionally ‘flip-flop’ motions across the bilayer (Cherry, Reference Cherry1978). These global motions, which are clearly integral to the functions of membranes, cannot be mimicked in proteins solubilized in organic solvents, detergents, or frozen at low temperatures, again emphasizing the importance of studying membrane proteins as part of the membrane assembly under physiological conditions.
The basic understanding of the properties of biological membranes began to emerge in the early 1970s (Singer & Nicholson, Reference Singer and Nicholson1972). This is in contrast to the dramatic announcements that signaled the birth of molecular biology 15–20 years earlier with the structure of the DNA double helix in 1953 (Watson & Crick, Reference Watson and Crick1953) and that of the protein myoglobin in 1958 (Kendrew et al. Reference Kendrew, Bodo, Dintzis, Parrish, Wyckoff and Philips1958). All three of these classes of molecules, DNA, proteins, and lipids, as well as carbohydrates, and their partners and complexes must have evolved in concert, and are inextricably linked. As a result, the underlying theme of this review is how the liquid crystalline environment of phospholipid bilayers affects the properties of membrane proteins. This is the situation even when the membrane is reduced to its minimal chemical composition of a single type of protein-containing phospholipid that self-assembles as described by the fluid mosaic model (Singer & Nicholson, Reference Singer and Nicholson1972).
1.4 NMR of phospholipid bilayers
NMR played a key role in sorting out the properties of the various lipid assemblies studied in the early 1970s, including their implications for the structures of membrane proteins. In large part this is due to NMR being well suited for the characterization of local and global dynamics. Even when quantitative interpretations may be elusive, there is no mistaking the effects of large-amplitude, rapid motions on NMR spectra because of the dramatic narrowing of resonances that occurs.
The earliest NMR experiment on membranes focused on bilayers of pure phospholipids as well as of mixtures of lecithins. Isotopic labeling was rarely used because of its limited availability as well as the technical limitations of the commercial spectrometers. Thus, at the time, the only viable spectroscopic approach was high-resolution 1H solution NMR, which was performed using instruments and methods developed for liquids. This limitation in spectroscopic technology contributed to their being a fundamental controversy in the field from the very beginning.
The facts were indisputable. Phospholipids in water formed bilayers that yielded very broad 1H resonances (Chan et al. Reference Chan, Feigenson and Seiter1971, Reference Chan, Seiter and Feigenson1972, Reference Chan, Sheetz, Seiter, Feigenson, Hsu, Lau and Yau1973; Finer et al. Reference Finer, Flook and Hauser1972; Keough et al. Reference Keough, Oldfield and Chapman1973; Lichtenberg et al. Reference Lichtenberg, Petersen, Girardet, Kainosho, Kroon, Seiter, Feigenson and Chan1975; Veksli et al. Reference Veksli, Salsbury and Chapman1969). When these same samples were subjected to sonication, forming small, discrete ‘sonicated vesicles’, the spectra contained much narrower 1H resonances. At the time, there were several theoretical interpretations to explain the drastic differences in signal properties from the same molecules in liposomes that appeared to differ only in diameter (Seiter & Chan, Reference Seiter and Chan1973). One explanation was that the lipids have basically the same properties in liposomes and vesicles, and the line narrowing resulted from the more rapid isotropic reorientation of vesicles, which could have a diameter as small as 250 Å, compared to the extended two-dimensional (2D) arrays in multilamellar liposomes. The other explanation was that the phospholipid environment in small vesicles was perturbed by the effects of sonication and the formation of a highly curved assembly, and that the resulting local disorder led to local motions of the lipid chains and line narrowing of the 1H resonances (Sheetz & Chan, Reference Sheetz and Chan1972).
Through many studies, the properties of liposomes were characterized and it was understood that the large assemblies of lipids were ill suited for solution NMR experimental methods and theories. The major advances awaited the advent of solid-state NMR spectroscopy, which utilized 2H, 31P, and 13C signals from the phospholipids. The initial studies were from the group of Chapman, which broadly explored the application of NMR to liposomes (Keough et al. Reference Keough, Oldfield and Chapman1973; Oldfield et al. Reference Oldfield, Chapman and Derbyshire1971; Veksli et al. Reference Veksli, Salsbury and Chapman1969). There were two notable features about these studies. One was the use of a spin S=1 nucleus, deuterium, with its quadrupolar interaction available for analysis. The other was one of the first uses of isotopic labeling in biological NMR to place the deuterium nuclei at informative locations in the lipids. This addressed the limitations of using 1H NMR to study liquid crystalline systems with extended order. In highly anisotropic environments, such as liquid crystals and lipid bilayers, each 2H nucleus gives a doublet in the spectrum. For a bilayer membrane oriented on glass plates with the bilayer normal parallel to the magnetic field, the observed splitting measures the angle between the bond and the bilayer normal (Oldfield et al. Reference Oldfield, Chapman and Derbyshire1971). In powder samples, the magnitude of the quadrupolar coupling can also be measured, as well as any reduction from the static value interpreted in terms of dynamics, and this was particularly important in making the transition from the lipid to the protein components of membranes (Blume et al. Reference Blume, Wittebort, Das Gupta and Griffin1982; Keniry et al. Reference Keniry, Gutowsky and Oldfield1984; Kinsey et al. Reference Kinsey, Kintanar and Oldfield1981a, Reference Kinsey, Kintanar, Tsai, Smith, Janes and Oldfieldb; Seelig et al. Reference Seelig, Axel and Limacher1973; Smith & Oldfield, Reference Smith and Oldfield1984).
In 1973, Urbina and Waugh described the first application of high resolution solid-state NMR to membranes. They obtained natural abundance 13C NMR spectra of 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) bilayers above and below the phase transition. Presciently, the spectra showed more signal intensity at the lower temperature where the dipolar couplings are stronger, enabling more efficient cross-polarization from the abundant 1H nuclei to the ‘dilute’ 13C nuclei. The implementation of 13C detection opened up many more sites, as well as the 13C chemical shift anisotropy and heteronuclear 13C–1H dipole–dipole spin-interactions for investigation. Among the first findings about a protein embedded in a membrane bilayer was the dramatic effects of the rotational diffusion, as anticipated in the fluid mosaic model of membrane proteins, by the averaging of the 13C′ powder pattern in labeled bacteriorhodopsin in membrane bilayers (Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Harbison, Herzfeld and Griffin1985).
1.5 Protein structure
The precisely folded 3D structure of a protein arranges the chemical functional groups of backbone and side chain sites so that they can carry out the necessary functions with high selectivity and efficiency, for example, catalysis of chemical reactions, transport of ions and organic molecules, binding of signaling molecules, etc. (Petsko & Ringe, Reference Petsko and Ringe2008). Generally, any variation from the native structure results in an inactive protein with accompanying consequences for biological function. The secondary and tertiary structures of a protein are commonly represented graphically by backbone ribbons (Richardson, Reference Richardson1981). These and other representations of protein structures are typically derived from many individual distances and angles between proximate atoms, as measured in X-ray diffraction or solution NMR experiments. Magic angle spinning (MAS) solid-state NMR provides similar local structural parameters. In contrast, oriented sample (OS) solid-state NMR provides primarily angular constraints measured relative to a single external axis, such as the magnetic field. In all cases, the quality of the structures benefits from the complementary measurements from the various techniques, with the primary issue being that the samples provide comparable membrane environments. Notably, the backbone structure of a protein is equivalently represented by the dihedral angles between the peptide planes in a Ramachandran plot (Ramachandran et al. Reference Ramachandran, Ramakrishnan and Sasisekharan1963).
Since protein structure determination started with X-ray diffraction of single crystals (Dickerson et al. Reference Dickerson, Reddy, Pinkerton and Steinrauf1962; Kendrew et al. Reference Kendrew, Bodo, Dintzis, Parrish, Wyckoff and Philips1958; Perutz et al. Reference Perutz, Rossman, Cullis, Muirhead and Georg1960), and the majority of new structures continue to be determined with this approach, globular proteins are often envisaged as very complex, folded polypeptides, even though they reside and function in aqueous solution where they undergo rapid isotropic reorientation. In addition, large-amplitude side chain motions are superimposed on the backbone structure of the proteins (Gall et al. Reference Gall, Cross, Diverdi and Opella1982; Wuthrich & Wagner, Reference Wuthrich and Wagner1975). Here we discuss the structure determination of membrane proteins in their native environment of phospholipid bilayers by solid-state NMR spectroscopy (Opella, Reference Opella2013b; Zhou & Cross, Reference Zhou and Cross2013), and the effects of their sequence and environment on their 3D structure (Franks et al. Reference Franks, Linden, Kunert, Van Rossum and Oschkinat2012).
Although equally true for all proteins, the combined influence on protein structure from both its sequence of amino acids and its environment is most evident in membrane proteins largely because they are embedded in highly asymmetric, liquid crystalline phospholipids, rather than an isotropic solution or a regular lattice. The nature of the membrane environment used in experimental studies, especially structure determination by NMR, of membrane proteins has been a major factor since the beginning of the field (Bosch et al. Reference Bosch, Brown and Wuthrich1980; Cross & Opella, Reference Cross and Opella1979, Reference Cross and Opella1980; Lauterwein et al. Reference Lauterwein, Bosch, Brown and Wuthrich1979). Environments ranging from mixed organic solvents to protein-containing phospholipid bilayers (proteoliposomes) (Banerjee & Datta, Reference Banerjee and Datta1983) have been used in structural and other physical and chemical studies of membrane proteins. Because of the difficulty in dealing with these highly hydrophobic proteins, often the goal of the synthetic membrane environment was simply to solubilize the polypeptides so that measurements could be made. Now, with a growing database of membrane protein structures, it is becoming apparent that detergents and organic solvents are generally problematic. The amino acid sequence alone is not sufficient to determine the 3D structure of a protein. Just as globular proteins require an aqueous environment to fold properly, membrane proteins require liquid crystalline phospholipid bilayers. Both classes of proteins require physiological conditions of temperature, pH, concentration, etc. Solid-state NMR is essential for studies of membrane proteins associated with lipid bilayers because they are effectively ‘immobilized’ by their interactions in this large supramolecular membrane structure. A variety of solid-state NMR approaches have been applied to membrane proteins and recent reviews are available on specific examples and aspects of the method (http://www.drorlist.com/nmr/MPNMR.html; Cegelski, Reference Cegelski2013; Comellas & Rienstra, Reference Comellas and Rienstra2013; Franks et al. Reference Franks, Linden, Kunert, Van Rossum and Oschkinat2012; Goncalves et al. Reference Goncalves, Eilers, South, Opefi, Laissue, Reeves and Smith2013; Hong et al. Reference Hong, Zhang and Hu2012; Judge & Watts, Reference Judge and Watts2011; Knight et al. Reference Knight, Felli, Pierattelli, Emsley and Pintacuda2013; McDermott, Reference Mcdermott2009; Mueller & Dunn, Reference Mueller and Dunn2013; Murray et al. Reference Murray, Das and Cross2013; Opella, Reference Opella2013a, Reference Opellab; Parthasarathy et al. Reference Parthasarathy, Nishiyama and Ishii2013; Popot, Reference Popot2010; Saito et al. Reference Saito, Ando and Ramamoorthy2010; Sengupta et al. Reference Sengupta, Nadaud and Jaroniec2013; Shi & Ladizhansky, Reference Shi and Ladizhansky2012; Tang et al. Reference Tang, Comellas and Rienstra2013a; Ullrich & Glaubitz, Reference Ullrich and Glaubitz2013; Ulrich, Reference Ulrich2005; Weingarth & Baldus, Reference Weingarth and Baldus2013; Yan et al. Reference Yan, Suiter, Hou, Zhang and Polenova2013).
Proteoliposomes are nearly ideal samples for structure determination of membrane proteins, since the proteins are embedded in chemically defined, fully hydrated, liquid crystalline phospholipid bilayers. This is illustrated in the iconic representation by Singer and Nicholson of the ‘fluid mosaic’ model of a biological membrane (Singer & Nicholson, Reference Singer and Nicholson1972). It is important that the forces exerted by the phospholipids on the polypeptides in proteoliposomes are likely to be very similar to those encountered in a biological membrane. Significantly, the proteins in membranes are highly constrained in most directions while undergoing two types of large-amplitude, rapid, global motions. These are fast rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal and lateral diffusion in the plane of the bilayer.
Most of the previous characterizations of membrane protein dynamics have focused on local backbone motions and those of the side chains, many of which have important implications for the functions of the proteins (Gall et al. Reference Gall, Cross, Diverdi and Opella1982; Herzfeld et al. Reference Herzfeld, Mulliken, Siminovitch and Griffin1987; Keniry et al. Reference Keniry, Gutowsky and Oldfield1984; Kinsey et al. Reference Kinsey, Kintanar and Oldfield1981a; Leo et al. Reference Leo, Colnago, Valentine and Opella1987; Wuthrich & Wagner, Reference Wuthrich and Wagner1975). Here, we focus on the influence of global rotational diffusion of the membrane proteins about the bilayer normal, not only to understand its effects on the protein structures, dynamics, and functions, but also in order to exploit this fundamental property of membrane proteins to expand the repertoire of solid-state NMR spectroscopy for protein structure determination (Das et al. Reference Das, Nothnagel, Lu, Son, Tian, Marassi and Opella2012; Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Harbison, Herzfeld and Griffin1985; Park et al. Reference Park, Casagrande, Das, Albrecht, Chu and Opella2011b).
1.6 Global motions of membrane proteins
In aqueous solution, globular, soluble proteins undergo rapid isotropic reorientation; the rate or frequency of the motion is generally described in terms of the rotational correlation time, which is typically only somewhat slower than the timescale of a liquid, in the range of 1–20 nsec. The diameter of the protein and viscosity of the solution determine the rotational correlation time. In cases where the protein structure is non-spherical, the reorientation is found to be anisotropic. The overall rotational motions of soluble, globular proteins are well characterized by NMR and other biophysical experiments (Bauer et al. Reference Bauer, Opella, Nelson and Pecora1975) and in most cases, it is readily possible to distinguish any local backbone motions from the overall reorientation of the protein based on their differences in frequencies, amplitudes, and directions, which generally result in a sub-set of narrower, more intense, resonances superimposed on the background of broad resonances associated with the folded, structured bulk of the protein (Bogusky et al. Reference Bogusky, Schiksnis, Leo and Opella1987).
In contrast, the extremely asymmetric chemical and physical environment of phospholipid bilayers drastically affects the global motions of membrane proteins (Edidin, Reference Edidin1974). There are three major classes of motions of the protein in the bilayer to consider, two of which the NMR experiment is insensitive to. First, there are ‘flip-flop’ motions where the molecule goes from one side of the bilayer to the other. NMR is insensitive to these symmetric inversions, and flip-flop motions have generally been characterized as infrequent events, too slow to be detected by the vast majority of NMR experiments. The second is lateral diffusion in the plane of the bilayer, which has been thoroughly studied in a number of cases and may be of great importance to biological functions (Devaux & McConnell, Reference Devaux and McConnell1973; Devaux & McDonnell, Reference Devaux and Mcdonnell1972; Poo & Cone, Reference Poo and Cone1973, Reference Poo and Cone1974). However, NMR is also insensitive to translational motion.
The third type of global motion, rotational diffusion, is crucial for both the functions of the proteins and an approach to the determination of the structures in the bilayer environment. Well-understood physical laws (Durr et al. Reference Durr, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2007), two of which are directly pertinent to determining structure from global motions, govern NMR spectroscopy. One is the timescale. The frequency breadth of the spin-interactions, represented in the spectra as powder patterns, defines a ‘ruler’ for the rate at which motions affect the spectra. Motions that are ‘fast’ compared to the frequency breadth average the powder patterns, and those that are ‘slow’ do not affect the spectra. The second is the angular dependence, which has an equally strong, but entirely different effect on the spectra.
1.7 Effects of motional averaging in solid-state NMR spectroscopy
There are substantial molecular motions in seemingly rigid solids that strongly affect NMR spectra. This is not a generalized narrowing, but rather well-defined motions about a single axis that produced predictable and quantitative changes in the powder patterns that could be directly related to the line shapes observed in the same samples without motions (Gutowsky & Pake, Reference Gutowsky and Pake1950), for example at very low temperatures. Importantly, the motionally averaged powder patterns reflect the precise geometry of the internal motion about a fixed axis, and are highly relevant to the situations encountered with proteins used as samples for 1H/13C/15N triple-resonance experiments. This is the key concept for deriving structural information from rotationally averaged powder patterns, which we refer to as rotationally aligned (RA) solid-state NMR. In the case of membrane proteins, we consider the vast majority of backbone N–H and C–H bonds to be rigid on the time scales of the dipole–dipole and chemical shift interactions, thus it is the motion from the global rotational diffusion of the protein in the liquid crystalline bilayer that averages the powder pattern as determined by the angle between the principal axis of the coupled pair of nuclei (Gutowsky & Pake, Reference Gutowsky and Pake1950) or the chemical shift tensor (Mehring et al. Reference Mehring, Griffin and Waugh1971) of a site and the bilayer normal (McLaughlin et al. Reference Mclaughlin, Cullis, Hemminga, Hoult, Radda, Ritchie, Seeley and Richards1975).
With the increasing interest in the analysis of the functions of membrane proteins in terms of their structures, there is a heightened concern about the influence of the surrounding environment when it is provided by detergents, non-natural lipids, organic solvents, crystal packing, etc. (Durr et al. Reference Durr, Soong and Ramamoorthy2013; Judge & Watts, Reference Judge and Watts2011; Kruger-Koplin et al. Reference Kruger-Koplin, Sorgen, Druieger-Koplin, Rivera-Torres, Cahill, Krulwich and Girvin2004; Page et al. Reference Page, Moore, Nguyen, Sharma, Chase, Gao, Mobley, Sanders, Ma, Sonnichsen, Lee, Howell, Opella and Cross2006; Poget & Girvin, Reference Poget and Girvin2007; Sanders & Oxenoid, Reference Sanders and Oxenoid2000; Vinogradova et al. Reference Vinogradova, Sonnichsen and Sanders1998). Nonetheless, considerable progress has been made in describing the structures of membrane proteins, primarily by focusing on exceptional cases, for example bacteriorhodopsin, which as a bacterial photo transducer is an extraordinarily stable protein. The early applications of electron microscopy of tilted, unstained samples to identify the seven trans-membrane TM helices of bacteriorhodopsin in its native purple membrane environment were crucial first steps in understanding the architecture of membrane proteins (Henderson & Unwin, Reference Henderson and Unwin1975). As shown by a variety of experimental measurements, bacteriorhodopsin protein molecules are constrained in their highly ordered bilayer environment containing diphytanyl lipids. However, when the protein is purified and reconstituted into bilayers consisting primarily of phosphatidyl choline lipids, it undergoes rapid rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal at temperatures above that of the gel to liquid crystalline phase transition temperature of the lipids (Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Harbison, Herzfeld and Griffin1985). In a spectrum obtained at 3°C, well below the DMPC phase transition temperature, the chemical shift powder pattern from the carbonyl carbons has the full width and asymmetry expected in a rigid lattice. In contrast, the spectrum of the same sample obtained at 30°C, above the phase transition temperature, is much narrower and axially symmetric as the result of the motional narrowing from the rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal. This shows that the majority of labeled carbonyl groups are aligned in the protein with the C–O bond almost parallel to the bilayer normal, which is consistent with the arrangement of helices in the static structures. Similar results are obtained for other highly helical membrane proteins because the helices are aligned approximately parallel to the bilayer normal. Indeed, the 13C′ resonance line shape in an unoriented, stationary sample is often used as a ‘control’ experiment to ensure that the protein is undergoing rapid rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal under the experimental conditions for the structure determination.
Taken together, these early structural and dynamic studies of bacteriorhodopsin demonstrated that fast rotational diffusion of membrane proteins about the bilayer normal depends on lipid composition and temperature. Typically, the rate of rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal can be switched between frequencies that are ‘slow’ or ‘fast’ on the relevant NMR timescales defined by the frequency breadth of the static powder patterns by changing the temperature between values that are below or above, respectively, the gel to liquid crystalline phase transition temperature of the phospholipids. These experiments serve to map out the basic parameters of lipid and protein motions in artificial and biological membrane bilayers. Of particular importance to structure determination is the finding that under most conditions even quite large membrane proteins undergo fast rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal that is highly relevant to NMR spectroscopy (Park et al. Reference Park, Casagrande, Das, Albrecht, Chu and Opella2011b).
1.8 Equivalence of rotational diffusion and sample alignment
Early studies indicated that the membrane was in a ‘fluid’ state, a term that was often used synonymously with liquid crystalline state (McConnell & Hubbell, Reference McConnell and Hubbell1971; McConnell et al. Reference McConnell, Wright and Mcfarland1972; Wien et al. Reference Wien, Morrisett and Mcconnelll1972). Certainly some of the magnetic resonance experiments on synthetic and biological bilayers gave results compatible with large amplitude effectively isotropic motions because of the extensive line narrowing. However, as the research moved toward unperturbed bilayers, the asymmetric nature of phospholipid bilayers dominated the effects. As mentioned above, early critical experiments utilized rhodopsin, especially those of Cone (Cone, Reference Cone1972), which measured the relaxation due to rotation about an axis normal to the plane of the disc membrane.
The rotational diffusion of membrane proteins merges OS solid-state NMR and MAS solid-state NMR experimental methods enabling the complementary use of aligned and unoriented samples, and increasing the potential for synergy between isotropic and anisotropic nuclear spin interaction contributions to protein structure determination. This is feasible because the same rotationally averaged powder patterns observed in stationary unoriented samples can be measured in MAS solid-state NMR spectra of unoriented samples through the application of ‘slow spinning’ (Herzfeld & Berger, Reference Herzfeld and Berger1980; Wylie et al. Reference Wylie, Sperling, Frericks, Shah, Franks and Rienstra2007) or recoupling methods (Chan & Tycko, Reference Chan and Tycko2003; Wylie et al. Reference Wylie, Franks and Rienstra2006). Here, we use the spectral parameters associated with the 15N and 13C chemical shifts and 1H–15N and 1H–13C dipolar couplings in specifically labeled backbone and side chain sites to demonstrate the equivalence of mechanical and magnetic uniaxial alignment of protein-containing bilayers and ‘rotational alignment’ of the membrane proteins resulting from their rapid rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal in unoriented samples when the temperature is higher than that of the gel to liquid crystalline transition for the phospholipids. Because the resonance frequencies are determined by the orientations of functional groups (chemical shift) or chemical bonds (dipole–dipole coupling) relative to a single axis defined by the direction of the magnetic field or by rotational diffusion about the bilayer normal, the protein structure is mapped onto the resulting spectra by the anisotropy of the spin interactions.
These measurements are well suited for membrane proteins that undergo rapid rotational diffusion in phospholipid bilayers. Also, these measurements are particularly forgiving with respect to experimental errors and uncertainties regarding the principal values and orientations of the tensors in the molecular frame because site-to-site errors do not accumulate. Each measurement is made independently relative to a common external axis, in this case the bilayer normal. In complementary approaches, the axis can be in the direction of the magnetic field, orthogonal to the field, or relative to the mechanical alignment on glass plates (Park et al. Reference Park, Das, Deangelis, Scrima and Opella2010a).
Uniaxial sample alignment, where the direction of the molecular alignment is parallel to that of the magnetic field, is the next most general type of sample after a single crystal. In this case, the sample has one direction of orientation and the other two directions are random or undefined. What is most notable is that while these samples are capable of yielding very high-resolution spectra when they are aligned parallel to the field, the line shapes are 2D powder patterns when they are tilted away from parallel (Opella & Waugh, Reference Opella and Waugh1977). This is seen most dramatically when the axis of alignment is perpendicular to the direction of the field. However, the situation is greatly simplified when the molecule of interest undergoes fast rotational diffusion about a single axis, in which case single line spectra are observed in all directions of alignment (Park et al. Reference Park, Mrse, Nevzorov, De Angelis and Opella2005).
Membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayers can be aligned mechanically between glass plates (Bechinger et al. Reference Bechinger, Kim, Chirlian, Gesell, Neumann, Montal, Tomich, Zasloff and Opella1991; Murray et al. Reference Murray, Das and Cross2013). As with uniaxially aligned polymers, when the axis of alignment is parallel to the field single line resonances are observed regardless of whether any molecular motion is present. Magnetically aligned samples of membrane proteins were originally sought as direct replacements for mechanically aligned samples (De Angelis et al. Reference De Angelis, Nevzorov, Park, Howell, Mrse and Opella2004) and once it was discovered that the lanthanide ions added to the lipids could ‘flip’ the alignment so that the bilayer normals were parallel to the field (Prosser et al. Reference Prosser, Hunt, Dinatale and Vold1996), then that was the case. However, the presence of detergents to form the ends of the bilayer discs and lanthanides is of concern for their possible effects on the protein structures of interest.
2. Examples of membrane proteins
A variety of solid-state NMR approaches to study of membrane proteins have been reviewed. The field is fortunate in having an up-to-date web site where the structures of membrane proteins determined by solid-state NMR (http://www.drorlist.com/nmr/SPNMR.html) are summarized. The structures of proteins obtained by heterologous expression and reconstituted in phospholipids are providing the foundation for the future of the field, since they incorporate the principal advantages of NMR. Taken from the DrorList in January 2014, the structures of domains and full-length membrane proteins determined by OS solid-state NMR of stationary, aligned samples include the M2 channel-lining segment of the acetylcholine receptor (Opella et al. Reference Opella, Marassi, Gesell, Valente, Kim, Oblatt-Montal and Montal1999), the Influenza M2 channel (Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Yi, Dong, Qin, Peterson, Busath, Zhou and Cross2010), the membrane-bound form of the coat protein from filamentous bacteriophage fd (Marassi & Opella, Reference Marassi and Opella2003), the transmembrane (TM) channel-forming domain of Virus protein ‘u’ (Vpu) from human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) (Park et al. Reference Park, Mrse, Nevzorov, Mesleh, Oblatt-Montal, Montal and Opella2003), and the truncated form of the mercury transport membrane protein MerFt (De Angelis et al. Reference De Angelis, Howell, Nevzorov and Opella2006). By combining OS solid-state NMR data with solution NMR data obtained on the same proteins in micelles, there are additional examples of membrane proteins which have had their structures determined, including stannin (Buck-Koehntop et al. Reference Buck-Koehntop, Mascioni, Buffy and Veglia2005), phospholamban (Traaseth et al. Reference Traaseth, Shi, Verardi, Mullen, Barany and Veglia2009; Verardi et al. Reference Verardi, Shi, Traaseth, Walsh and Veglia2011), the membrane-bound form of the coat protein from filamentous bacteriophage Pf1 (Park et al. Reference Park, Marassi, Black and Opella2010b), and cytochrome b5 (Ahuja et al. Reference Ahuja, Jahr, Im, Vivekanandan, Popovych, Le Clair, Huang, Soong, Xu, Yamamoto, Nanga, Bridges, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2013). Of greatest relevance to the topic of deriving structure from motion in this article are the membrane protein structures determined by RA solid-state NMR, which include the truncated form of the mercury transport membrane protein MerFt (Das et al. Reference Das, Nothnagel, Lu, Son, Tian, Marassi and Opella2012), the full-length mercury transport membrane protein MerF (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Tian, Vora, Marassi and Opella2013), the viral membrane protein p7 from the human hepatitis C virus (unpublished results), and the 350-residue chemokine receptor CXCR1 (Park et al. Reference Park, Das, Casagrande, Tian, Nothnagel, Chu, Kiefer, Maier, De Angelis, Marassi and Opella2012).
2.1 Filamentous bacteriophage coat proteins
Studies of filamentous bacteriophages have provided many insights into fundamental biological processes. They have played early and important roles in structural biology, in large part because the major coat protein is both a membrane bound protein and a structural protein of a DNA–protein complex at different stages of the lifecycle. Moreover, the high efficiency of their self-propagation in bacteria provides the capability of preparing milligram quantities for NMR experimental studies. Indeed, the major coat protein of both class I (fd, M13) and class II (Pf1) filamentous bacteriophages has been used in many aspects of the development and application of NMR to both membrane proteins and structural proteins of biological supramolecular assemblies.
Each bacteriophage particle is a long, thin filament, which consists of several thousand copies of the major coat protein wrapped around its single stranded DNA genome that is extended lengthwise within the particle. The particle is about 90% by weight major coat protein, therefore the vast majority of the signals in NMR spectra of uniformly labeled bacteriophage particles come from the structural form of the coat protein. Additionally, at high concentrations the intact bacteriophage particles have liquid crystalline properties and align in the presence of a strong magnetic field. Since the coat protein subunits are packed symmetrically with respect to the longitudinal axis of the phage particles, each site in the coat protein gives rise to a single resonance. The particles have masses of several million daltons, which immobilizes the coat proteins and DNA on the requisite NMR timescales, even though the samples are clear, pourable solutions. As a result, the structural form of the protein satisfies all of the sample requirements of OS solid-state NMR, and with about 50 residues has proven to be an invaluable model protein for the development of the methodology and ultimately for structure determination of structural (Zeri et al. Reference Zeri, Mesleh, Nevzorov and Opella2003) and membrane proteins (Marassi & Opella, Reference Marassi and Opella2003) in supramolecular complexes (Opella et al. Reference Opella, Zeri and Park2008). An important benefit of using OS solid-state NMR is that the structural studies can be carried out directly on intact, infectious phage particles, ensuring that the information is biologically relevant.
The major coat protein of M13 bacteriophage, which is widely used in molecular biology laboratory procedures, differs from that of fd in only a single amino acid, and they can be thought of as mutants of each other. Early structural and dynamics studies of the membrane bound forms of the coat proteins were performed in detergent micelles, and included experiments that utilized 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR (Cross & Opella, Reference Cross and Opella1985; Henry & Sykes, Reference Henry and Sykes1990; McDonnell et al. Reference Mcdonnell, Shon, Kim and Opella1993; Opella et al. Reference Opella, Cross, Diverdi and Sturm1980). The first high-resolution structure of the membrane-bound form of the fd bacteriophage phage coat protein was determined in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) detergent micelles by solution NMR (Almeida & Opella, Reference Almeida and Opella1997) and subsequently, the membrane-bound form of the coat protein in 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC)/1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (POPG) lipid bilayers (Marassi & Opella, Reference Marassi and Opella2003) was determined. The structure of the membrane bound form of the fd coat protein is shown in Fig. 1.
Three views of the structure of the membrane-bound form of fd coat protein in POPC/POPG phospholipid bilayers. The amphipathic in-plane helix is in magenta, the hydrophobic TM helix is in blue, and the short connecting turn is in yellow. The flexible N- and C-terminal residues are not shown. A. Side view of TM helix, the Trp and Lys side chains are shown in blue. The dashed gray lines mark the lipid-water boundary. B. Front view and, C. View of in-plane helix looking down from the C-terminus. From Marassi & Opella (Reference Marassi and Opella2003).
Pf1 infects Pseudomonas aeruginosa and is a class II filamentous bacteriophage. Studies of this protein have also been conducted in detergent micelles by solution NMR and in lipid bilayers by OS solid-state NMR. Using OS solid-state NMR, structures of Pf1 coat proteins have been solved in the intact bacteriophage (Thiriot et al. Reference Thiriot, Nevzorov, Zagyanskiy, Wu and Opella2004, Reference Thiriot, Nevzorov and Opella2005) and in lipid bilayers formed by q=3·2 14-O-PC (1,2-di-O-tetradecyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine)/6-O-PC (1,2-di-O-hexyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) bicelles (Park et al. Reference Park, Marassi, Black and Opella2010b). Complementary studies have been performed using MAS solid-state NMR on Pf1 bacteriophage (Goldbourt et al. Reference Goldbourt, Gross, Day and Mcdermott2007). Similar to fd phage, the Pf1 coat protein in lipid bilayers was found to be composed of a TM helix that has motion restrained by lipids and a water-soluble helix, which undergoes isotropic motion in water (Park et al. Reference Park, Marassi, Black and Opella2010b). Notably, the Pf1 assembly mechanism has been illustrated by combining the techniques of solid-state NMR and neutron diffraction (Nambudripad et al. Reference Nambudripad, Stark, Opella and Makowski1991; Shon et al. Reference Shon, Kim, Colnago and Opella1991). During phage assembly, these two helices again elongate to a single long helix with only a few residues in the middle deviating from ideal positions (Thiriot et al. Reference Thiriot, Nevzorov, Zagyanskiy, Wu and Opella2004). This is illustrated in Fig. 2.
Structures of the Pf1 coat protein. (A, B) The membrane-bound form of the protein. (C, D) The structural form in the intact bacteriophage particle. In the membrane-bound form of the protein, the acidic N-terminus region is exposed to the bacterial periplasmic space (peri) and the basic C-terminal region is exposed to the cytoplasm (cyto). Acidic residues (Asp and Glu) are shown in red, conserved glycine residues in the TM helix are in yellow, basic residues (Arg and Lys) are in blue, and interfacial tyrosines are in pink. Residues R44 and K45 face the cytoplasm in the membrane-bound form and the DNA on the interior of the bacteriophage particles. (B, D) Images obtained by 90° rotation of (A) and (C) around the z-axis. From Park et al. (Reference Park, Marassi, Black and Opella2010b).
2.2 M2 segment from nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAchR)
The nAchR resides in the membrane and plays key roles in the transmission of neurological signals. Each monomer of the protein has four TM helices, the second of which, M2, lines the ion pore formed by five of the monomers. Much of the understanding of the nAchR arises from functional studies and analysis of the ion pore formed by oligomerization of the M2 helical segments. M2 of nAchR was the first mammalian polypeptide domain expressed and labeled in bacteria for structure determination by NMR spectroscopy (Opella et al. Reference Opella, Marassi, Gesell, Valente, Kim, Oblatt-Montal and Montal1999). Since this work was performed at an early stage of the development of the field, comparisons were made between the findings in detergent micelles by solution NMR and those in oriented phospholipid bilayers on glass plates by solid-state NMR. In addition, the properties of M2 segments of the nAchR were compared to those of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Because of sample preparation difficulties this involved the comparison of synthetic polypeptides to expressed polypeptides, and the spectral results were typical in that much better data could be obtained from the expressed samples than the synthetic samples. This is generally the case and essentially all current studies are performed on heterologously expressed polypeptides in order to avoid the potential problems resulting from incompletely purified synthetic hydrophobic peptides.
A major result of the OS solid-state NMR studies was the determination of the helix tilt angle with respect to the bilayer normal, since this helped to characterize the ion pore in models of the intact receptor (Montal & Opella, Reference Montal and Opella2002; Opella et al. Reference Opella, Marassi, Gesell, Valente, Kim, Oblatt-Montal and Montal1999). A pentameric model of the M2 segments showing the central pore was built with the high-resolution NMR structures and the 9 Å electron crystallography structure (Unwin, Reference Unwin1995) (Fig. 3).
Subsequent studies on the nAchR using solution NMR have been performed; for example, the structures of four-TM-helical subunits have been characterized in organic solvent (Bondarenko et al. Reference Bondarenko, Tillman, Xu and Tang2010) and in lauryldimethylamine-oxide (LDAO) micelles (Bondarenko et al. Reference Bondarenko, Mowrey, Tillman, Cui, Liu, Xu and Tang2012). However, because of the use of the organic solvent and detergent micelles it is difficult to place these results in the structural context of the intact receptor in phospholipid bilayers.
Top and side views of a model of the AChM2 funnel-like pentameric bundle. The channel architecture was calculated using the 3D coordinates of the M2 helix in the lipid bilayer based on restraints from solid-state NMR experiments, and by imposing a symmetric pentameric organization. The top view has the C-terminal synaptic side in front. The wide mouth of the funnel is on the N-terminal, intracellular side of the pore. Middle view shows the side chains from the pore lining residues of Glu1, Ser8, Val15, Leu18, and Gln22. Bottom view contour depicts the pore profile. From Opella et al. (Reference Opella, Marassi, Gesell, Valente, Kim, Oblatt-Montal and Montal1999).
2.3 Vpu from HIV-1
Vpu is an 81-residue membrane protein containing a single N-terminal TM helix and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain containing amphipathic helices. It is found exclusively in HIV-1 and has multiple functions, which include facilitating the release of viral particles from infected cells as well as the degradation of CD4 in the host cells (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Maldarelli, Karczewski, Willey and Strebel1993; Gonzalez & Carrasco, Reference Gonzalez and Carrasco2003; Schubert et al. Reference Schubert, Bour, Ferrer-Montiel, Montal, Maldarell and Strebel1996). Full-length and multiple truncated constructs were created for some of the early studies, enabling their topology and helical orientation to be defined by solid-state NMR (Marassi et al. Reference Marassi, Ma, Gratkowski, Straus, Strebel, Oblatt-Montal, Montal and Opella1999). Research efforts were devoted to the search for the best candidates for structural characterization, which is exemplified by the expression and functional studies aimed toward defining the minimal folding units (Ma et al. Reference Ma, Marassi, Jones, Straus, Bour, Strebel, Schubert, Oblatt-Montal, Montal and Opella2002). A well-behaved construct was found to include only the TM helix (residues 2–30) and six additional residues for optimal expression, purification, and stability (named ‘Vpu2–30+’). A high-resolution structure of the construct was obtained with OS solid-state NMR (Park et al. Reference Park, Mrse, Nevzorov, Mesleh, Oblatt-Montal, Montal and Opella2003) (Fig. 4). Importantly, the ion-channel activity is retained in the truncated construct. The structural characterization of the TM domain led to many subsequent applications: the structures of Vpu in magnetically aligned bicelles (Park et al. Reference Park, De Angelis, Nevzorov, Wu and Opella2006), the effect of the A18H mutation to its conformation (Park & Opella, Reference Park and Opella2007; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Park, Tian and Opella2013b), and the interaction with the BST-2 protein which is an important step in the molecular mechanism of viral infection (Skasko et al. Reference Skasko, Wang, Tian, Tokarev, Munguia, Ruiz, Stephens, Opella and Guatelli2012). MAS solid-state NMR studies by Tycko and co-workers also started with a similar TM helix construct (Sharpe et al. Reference Sharpe, Yau and Tycko2005), and the study led to the conclusion that there are mixed oligomerization states of the protein in lipid bilayers (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Sharpe, Ghirlando, Yau and Tycko2010).
The next step in the structural studies was to characterize the full-length protein, which would include the functionally important cytoplasmic domain and be free of structural perturbation from protein truncation. Initial studies (Ma et al. Reference Ma, Marassi, Jones, Straus, Bour, Strebel, Schubert, Oblatt-Montal, Montal and Opella2002; Marassi et al. Reference Marassi, Ma, Gratkowski, Straus, Strebel, Oblatt-Montal, Montal and Opella1999) were hindered by the difficulties in obtaining high-resolution spectra, which could arise from the complex behavior of the amphipathic helices in various membrane environments. Solution NMR studies of the truncated cytoplasmic domain were carried out with the protein solubilized in water (Willbold et al. Reference Willbold, Hoffmann and Rösch1997). Willbold and co-workers obtained nuclear overhauser effect (NOE) distance restraints of the cytoplasmic domain in dodecylphosphatidylcholine (DPC) micelles and used paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) to characterize the protein topology (Wittlich et al. Reference Wittlich, Koenig, Stoldt, Schmidt and Willbold2009). The resulting structure showed a mixture of well-defined and highly dynamic regions, which reveals the complicated dynamics of the protein. The effort toward characterizing the full-length Vpu in the native-like bilayer environment can be seen in a recent structural study with MAS solid-state NMR of both Vpu and its interaction partner, CD4, in POPC lipid bilayers (Do Hoa et al. Reference Do Hoa, Wittlich, Glück Julian, Möckel, Willbold, Koenig Bernd and Heise2013).
Structural models of the TM segment of Vpu in a tetramer. The structure was determined by OS solid-state NMR in aligned, stationary phospholipid bilayers. Views of the minimum energy configuration of the tetrameric model; view from above (top) and side view (bottom) with Trp22 protruding out toward lipid head groups. From Park et al. (Reference Park, Mrse, Nevzorov, Mesleh, Oblatt-Montal, Montal and Opella2003).
2.4 Phospholamban
Phospholamban is a small 52-residue membrane protein. It has a C-terminal TM helix with its N-terminal portion exposed to the aqueous environment. Much of the research effort has been devoted to characterizing the structure and dynamics of the N-terminal amphipathic portion of the protein. Phospholamban exists as a homopentamer and dissociates into monomers that bind Ca2+–ATPase (SERCA) in a 1:1 molar ratio.
The NMR studies of phospholamban followed the trend of starting with protein samples in organic solvents (Lamberth et al. Reference Lamberth, Schmid, Muenchbach, Vorherr, Krebs, Carafoli and Griesinger2000; Pollesello & Annila, Reference Pollesello and Annila2002) and then studying them in detergent micelles and phospholipid bilayers. The structures determined in organic solvents successfully defined the TM helix structure but also displayed features that reflected the non-native environment, for example, that the amphipathic helix is not oriented properly. These features were addressed in subsequent structures of the monomeric (Zamoon et al. Reference Zamoon, Mascioni, Thomas and Veglia2003) and pentameric states (Oxenoid & Chou, Reference Oxenoid and Chou2005) determined by solution NMR of the polypeptide in DPC micelles. In both cases, part of the N-terminal cytoplasmic region was not well defined due to the local dynamics of the protein. In the monomeric structure, the flexible linker between two cytoplasmic domains made it difficult to determine their relative positions whereas in the pentameric structure, the N-terminal helix was oriented at an unusual angle with respect to the bilayer plane. Besides the technical difficulty of defining helix orientation using solution NMR, these structures are likely to be influenced by the detergent micelle environment and deviate from the structures in the native lipid bilayer (Zhou & Cross, Reference Zhou and Cross2013).
Features of both structures were subsequently addressed using solid-state NMR. The monomeric structure was calculated using a hybrid technique, incorporating restraints measured in DPC micelles by solution NMR and in DOPC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine) bilayers by solid-state NMR, followed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in explicit DOPC bilayers (Traaseth et al. Reference Traaseth, Shi, Verardi, Mullen, Barany and Veglia2009). Here, as well as in later studies (Traaseth & Veglia, Reference Traaseth and Veglia2010), DPC micelles were shown to alter the conformational equilibrium and change the helicity of the cytoplasmic domains, but the TM helix was well conserved in both environments. The pentamer structure determined later also provided well-defined N-terminal domains (Verardi et al. Reference Verardi, Shi, Traaseth, Walsh and Veglia2011), although it showed a different orientation of the TM helix. Compared to the ‘bellflower’ architecture, the alternative ‘pinwheel’ architecture supports the role of the pentameric state for the regulatory phospholamban protein. Only the ‘pinwheel’ architecture agrees with the spectrum acquired in planar lipid bilayers by solid-state NMR (Verardi et al. Reference Verardi, Shi, Traaseth, Walsh and Veglia2011), which suggests that the change of TM helix orientation may be associated with exposing the protein to detergents.
In a recent study, the monomeric phospholamban was reconstituted in the native sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane (Gustavsson et al. Reference Gustavsson, Traaseth and Veglia2012). The study revealed two structural states, which may explain the contradictory structures observed in detergent micelles and lipid bilayers. The structure of the phosphorylated pentameric form of the protein was also characterized (Vostrikov et al. Reference Vostrikov, Mote, Verardi and Veglia2013) (Fig. 5), and the structure shows the preserved pentamer conformation and an increase in the dynamics of the cytoplasmic region that agrees with previous observations (Oxenoid et al. Reference Oxenoid, Rice and Chou2007).
Another direction of research is toward the protein complex structure between the regulatory phospholamban and SERCA. The binding interface between the two proteins was mapped in lipid bilayers and interestingly, the bound form structure of phospholamban was found to be a minor conformation of the protein (Gustavsson et al. Reference Gustavsson, Verardi, Mullen, Mote, Traaseth, Gopinath and Veglia2013).
Ensembles of NMR structures of the nonphosphorylated form of phospholamban as pentamer with its amphipathic helix in the plane of the membrane bilayer. Top: view along membrane normal, middle: view of residues 1–17, and bottom: view perpendicular to membrane normal. From Vostrikov et al. (Reference Vostrikov, Mote, Verardi and Veglia2013).
2.5 Membrane-bound cytochrome b5
Cytochrome P450s are a widely distributed family of membrane proteins that carry out many biological functions, which are modulated by another membrane protein, cytochrome b5. Ramamoorthy and co-workers have used these proteins in the development of new methodologies and to describe their structures and inter-molecular interactions in membrane environments, micelles, and bicelles (Ahuja et al. Reference Ahuja, Jahr, Im, Vivekanandan, Popovych, Le Clair, Huang, Soong, Xu, Yamamoto, Nanga, Bridges, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2013; Pandey & Ramamoorthy, Reference Pandey and Ramamoorthy2013; Soong et al. Reference Soong, Smith, Xu, Yamamoto, Im, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2010; Xu et al. Reference Xu, Soong, Im, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2010; Yamamoto et al. Reference Yamamoto, Durr, Xu, Im, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2013a, Reference Yamamoto, Gildenberg, Ahuja, Im, Pearcy, Waskell and Ramamoorthyb).
Cytochrome P450 and cytochrome b5 are both membrane anchored proteins with a single TM helix. Because of their physiological importance, they are both well studied in truncated forms with the TM helix removed. However, this is a non-physiological state with only partial activities. These two proteins, along with the complex that they form, exemplify the obstacles encountered when trying to work with unmodified membrane proteins that interfere with structure determination by both conventional X-ray crystallography and solution NMR techniques.
The structure of full-length ferric cytochrome b5 was determined using a combination of solution NMR on detergent micelle samples and OS solid-state NMR on magnetically aligned bicelle samples. The protein consists of a globular heme-containing domain, whose structure could be determined by solution NMR methods because it is connected by a 15-residue highly flexible linker to the anchoring TM helix, whose study required the use of solid-state NMR (Soong et al. Reference Soong, Smith, Xu, Yamamoto, Im, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2010; Yamamoto et al. Reference Yamamoto, Gildenberg, Ahuja, Im, Pearcy, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2013b) because it is immobilized on solution NMR timescales when the protein interacts with micelles. The structure of the full-length protein based on data from these two types of NMR experiments is shown in Fig. 6.
NMR structure of rabbit microsomal cytb5. NMR structure of full-length cytb5 obtained from a combined solution and solid-state NMR approach. The soluble heme domain structure (residues 1–104) of full-length cytb5 was solved in DPC micelles by solution NMR. The TM domain structure (residues 106–126) of full-length cytb5 was determined in aligned DMPC/DHPC bicelles using solid-state NMR spectroscopy. From Ahuja et al. (Reference Ahuja, Jahr, Im, Vivekanandan, Popovych, Le Clair, Huang, Soong, Xu, Yamamoto, Nanga, Bridges, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2013).
Using a combination of chemical shift changes observed upon binding, (Pandey & Ramamoorthy, Reference Pandey and Ramamoorthy2013), site-directed mutagenesis, and docking calculations, it was possible to develop a structural model of the interface of the cytochrome b5–cytochrome P450 complex. In membrane proteins, dynamics are fundamental to the structure and activity of individual polypeptides as well as their interactions with binding partners, and the NMR studies of the cytochrome b5–cytochrome P450 complex revealed an ensemble of low-energy orientations of the two proteins (Ahuja et al. Reference Ahuja, Jahr, Im, Vivekanandan, Popovych, Le Clair, Huang, Soong, Xu, Yamamoto, Nanga, Bridges, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2013; Yamamoto et al. Reference Yamamoto, Durr, Xu, Im, Waskell and Ramamoorthy2013a).
2.6 M2 channel from influenza A
The tetramer of the M2 protein from influenza A forms a proton ion channel that promotes the acidification of the virus interior, an important step in the virus life cycle. The protein has been the subject of intensive research for more than a decade by X-ray crystallography, solution NMR, and solid-state NMR. The well-characterized channel-blocking drugs amantadine and rimantadine additionally aid in the structural studies of this protein.
As the opening of the M2 channel is triggered at pHs below 6, a process important for the Influenza lifecycle inside the endosome of lung epithelial cells, an important aim of research has been observing the structural and dynamic differences of the M2 channel at neutral and low pH. Structural studies have used X-ray crystallography (Acharya et al. Reference Acharya, Carnevale, Fiorin, Levine, Polishchuk, Balannik, Samish, Lamb, Pinto, Degrado and Klein2010), MAS solid-state NMR (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Luo and Hong2010), and OS solid-state NMR (Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Yi, Dong, Qin, Peterson, Busath, Zhou and Cross2010) (Fig. 7) to propose that the His37–Trp41 cluster, referred to as the ‘HxxxW quartet’, guides protons through hydrogen bond formation and breaking (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Fu, Nishimura, Zhang, Zhou, Busath, Vijayvergiya and Cross2006; Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Yi, Dong, Qin, Peterson, Busath, Zhou and Cross2010). This interpretation was built on computation and structure determination of the M2 channel in lipid bilayers (Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Yi, Dong, Qin, Peterson, Busath, Zhou and Cross2010). The structure was first calculated as a monomer using the orientational restraints obtained from OS solid-state NMR and a preliminary tetrameric structure was then assembled using PRE restraints and knowledge of the channel architecture. Restrained MD simulations were performed on the M2 tetramer embedded in a lipid bilayer of 4:1 DOPC:1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE), which is the same composition as was used in the OS solid-state NMR sample. The last step was a quantum chemical calculation focusing on the side chains of the His37–Trp41 cluster.
The dimer-of-dimer architecture of the tetrameric M2 channel, which is the core in this proposed conductance mechanism, was further supported in subsequent studies involving a combination of OS solid-state NMR and MAS solid-state NMR on a similar M2 truncated construct and the full-length M2 (Andreas et al. Reference Andreas, Eddy, Chou and Griffin2012; Can et al. Reference Can, Sharma, Hung, GOR'KOV, Brey and Cross2012; Miao et al. Reference Miao, Qin, Fu, Sharma, Can, Hung, Luca, GOR'KOV, Brey and Cross2012).
Notably, an important current trend in the research direction is toward the full-length M2 protein, and this is a recurring theme in several other membrane protein studies reviewed here. Early M2 structures have all been done with various constructs of the TM domain containing between 24 and 42 residues, such as (Cady et al. Reference Cady, Schmidt-Rohr, Wang, Soto, Degrado and Hong2010; Hu et al. Reference Hu, Asbury, Achuthan, Li, Bertram, Quine, Fu and Cross2007; Schnell & Chou, Reference Schnell and Chou2008; Sharma et al. Reference Sharma, Yi, Dong, Qin, Peterson, Busath, Zhou and Cross2010; Stouffer et al. Reference Stouffer, Acharya, Salom, Levine, Di Costanzo, Soto, Tereshko, Nanda, Stayrook and Degrado2008; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Kim, Kovacs and Cross2001). Recently, solid-state NMR studies have been carried out on full-length 97-residue M2 proteins reconstituted in DOPC/DOPE lipid bilayers and, more importantly, in native bacterial membrane bilayers (Miao et al. Reference Miao, Qin, Fu, Sharma, Can, Hung, Luca, GOR'KOV, Brey and Cross2012). A second study of the full-length protein has also exploited various lipid bilayer environments, including DMPC and mixtures of POPC, POPG, cholesterol, and sphingomyelin (Liao et al. Reference Liao, Fritzsching and Hong2013).
Structure of M2 tetrameter determined by OS solid-state NMR in phospholipid bilayers. Ribbon diagram of the amphipathic and TM helices. From Sharma et al. (Reference Sharma, Yi, Dong, Qin, Peterson, Busath, Zhou and Cross2010).
2.7 Mercury transporter MerF
Mercury transporter membrane proteins constitute an essential part of the bacterial mercury detoxification system. These transporter proteins are capable of transporting Hg2+ or organic mercurial compounds into cells and allowing them to be detoxified into elementary mercury by the enzyme mercuric reductase. The structure and topology of mercury transporter proteins from various isolates shows that there are multiple versions of the protein containing two, three, and four TM helices. The two TM helical member of the family is MerF, which has been the target of the most extensive structural studies by NMR.
Studies of MerF began with the analysis of the protein by solution NMR (Howell et al. Reference Howell, Mesleh and Opella2005). Among the isotropic bicelle and detergent micelle conditions, SDS micelles gave the best resolution and were chosen as the solubilizing environment for subsequent studies. A truncated form of the protein was also developed in the study, where the flexible ends of the protein were removed to minimize the complexity and facilitate calculation of the structure primarily from residual dipolar coupling (RDC) restraints. As was done with previously mentioned proteins, this truncated version of the protein, named MerFt, was subsequently reconstituted into a more native-like lipid bilayer environment, and its structure was determined in magnetically aligned DMPC/DHPC (1,2-dihexanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) bicelles (De Angelis et al. Reference De Angelis, Howell, Nevzorov and Opella2006) and DMPC proteoliposomes (Das et al. Reference Das, Nothnagel, Lu, Son, Tian, Marassi and Opella2012). Notably, these two structural determination efforts were also important milestones in the development of solid-state NMR methodologies in that they represent the first multiple helix TM protein determined by OS solid-state NMR as well as the first structure determined using RA solid-state NMR.
The technical challenges of an OS solid-state NMR study (De Angelis et al. Reference De Angelis, Howell, Nevzorov and Opella2006) have led to the implementation of new methods including the bicelle technology (De Angelis & Opella, Reference De Angelis and Opella2007; De Angelis et al. Reference De Angelis, Nevzorov, Park, Howell, Mrse and Opella2004), the new SAMPI4 pulse sequence (Nevzorov & Opella, Reference Nevzorov and Opella2007), and a structural fitting algorithm (Nevzorov & Opella, Reference Nevzorov and Opella2003). These advances were extended to the study of full-length MerF by OS solid-state NMR (Lu & Opella, Reference Lu and Opella2014), where a new round of technology improvement was made including the new MSHOT-Pi4 pulse sequence (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Park and Opella2012), new assignment strategies (Knox et al. Reference Knox, Lu, Opella and Nevzorov2010; Lu et al. Reference Lu, Son and Opella2011; Nevzorov, Reference Nevzorov2008), and new structure calculation methods (Marassi et al. Reference Marassi, Das, Lu, Nothnagel, Park, Son, Tian and Opella2011; Tian et al. Reference Tian, Schwieters, Opella and Marassi2012). Also, it was in the structure determination of MerFt (Das et al. Reference Das, Nothnagel, Lu, Son, Tian, Marassi and Opella2012) that the general pulse sequences and sample conditions for RA solid-state NMR were established (Das et al. Reference Das, Nothnagel, Lu, Son, Tian, Marassi and Opella2012; Marassi et al. Reference Marassi, Das, Lu, Nothnagel, Park, Son, Tian and Opella2011). In the subsequent extension to the structure determination of full-length MerF (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Tian, Vora, Marassi and Opella2013) (Fig. 8), methods for resonance assignments were further improved.
The full-length MerF structure determined in 14-O-PC lipid bilayers revealed a surprising structural rearrangement in one of the truncated ends, the N-terminal region (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Tian, Vora, Marassi and Opella2013). 14-O-PC is the ether linked alternative of the lipid DMPC, which has better stability (De Angelis & Opella, Reference De Angelis and Opella2007). The first 12 residues that had previously shown a large degree of dynamics in SDS micelles turned out to be on the same time scale of dynamics as the TM helices. In fact, these truncated residues form a continuing helix together with the subsequent 13 residues, which strongly suggests that the SDS detergent micelle environment completely alters the conformation of this domain of the protein. This is a classic example showing that the replacement of the native lipid bilayer environment by detergents can modify the structure and dynamics of membrane proteins.
Structure of MerF in phospholipid bilayers determined in 14-O-PC lipid bilayers using solid-state NMR. From Lu et al. (Reference Lu, Tian, Vora, Marassi and Opella2013).
2.8 p7 from Hepatitis C virus
p7 is one of the ten proteins encoded in the RNA genome of the human hepatitis C virus. Since p7 forms a small conductive channel in the membrane, it is categorized as a viroporin protein; however, p7 is involved in multiple protein–protein interactions in addition to forming the channel.
Structural studies of p7 were initially carried out in organic solvent, a recurring theme from previous sections. The first structure of p7 was obtained for a construct containing only the second TM helix solubilized in a trifluoroethanol (TFE)/water mixture (Montserret et al. Reference Montserret, Saint, Vanbelle, Salvay, Simorre, Ebel, Sapay, Renisio, Böckmann, Steinmann, Pietschmann, Dubuisson, Chipot and Penin2010) and the structure of full-length p7 was determined in methanol (Foster et al. Reference Foster, Thompson, Kalverda, Kankanala, Bentham, Wetherill, Thompson, Barker, Clarke, Noerenberg, Pearson, Rowlands, Homans, Harris, Foster and Griffin2013). More recently, structures of p7 from two different genotypes were determined in DPC micelles (OuYang et al. Reference Ouyang, Xie, Berardi, Zhao, Dev, Yu, Sun and Chou2013) and in DHPC micelles (Cook et al. Reference Cook, Dawson, Tian and Opella2013). Interestingly, the structure of p7 in DPC micelles was determined to be a hexamer with an unusual architecture where part of each p7 protein crosses over to interact with two p7 proteins that are not its neighbors. In contrast, the structure in DHPC micelles is monomeric and shows the topology typical of two TM helical proteins. However, a recent analysis on the hexamer p7 structure shows that the 18 charged side chains of arginine residues may be embedded in the hydrophobic membrane environment (Cross et al. Reference Cross, Murray and Watts2013), which is a feature indicating structural distortions as a result of the detergent micelle environment. Notably, these arginine side chains are on the outside of the structure and with the consideration of the spherical shape and limited diameter of detergent micelles, these charged side chains may be exposed to aqueous environment. Additionally, the interaction of helices in the hexameric p7 structure resembles the phenomenon of ‘domain swapping’ seen in the DgkA structure in detergent micelles (Van Horn et al. Reference Van Horn, Kim, Ellis, Hadziselimovic, Sulistijo, Karra, Tian, Sönnichsen and Sanders2009), which has recently been compared to a crystal structure of the same protein (Li et al. Reference Li, Lyons, Pye, Vogeley, Aragao, Kenyon, Shah, Doherty, Aherne and Caffrey2013; Zheng & Jia, Reference Zheng and Jia2013; Zhou & Cross, Reference Zhou and Cross2013). Lastly, the packing of the hexamer structure has revealed several cavities embedded in the hydrophobic lipid environment that expose some of the hydrophilic backbone or side chain atoms.
In contrast, we have recently determined the 3D structure of p7 in phospholipid bilayers by RA solid-state NMR. The resulting structure, shown in Fig. 9, is of a typical membrane protein with two TM helices. There is a break in the N-terminal helix, but it still passes through the bilayer. The C-terminal helix is shorter, and barely brings the C-terminus to the surface of the bilayer. The inter-helical loop adopts a single unique fold on the timescales of the NMR experiments. It is likely that this structure unit interacts with itself to form oligomers, and with other proteins to function in infected cells.
Structure of p7 in phospholipid bilayers determined by solid-state NMR spectroscopy (G.A. Cook, L.A. Dawson, Y. Tian, B.S. Das, and S.J. Opella, unpublished results).
2.9 DsbB from Escherichia coli
The disulfide bond formation protein B (DsbB) resides in the cytoplasmic membrane of E. coli. It has four TM helices and functions to harvest the oxidizing power of membrane-associated quinones to reoxidize its interaction partner DsbA, which subsequently catalyzes the disulfide bond formation of proteins in the periplasmic space. Homologs of this protein found in several virulent bacteria are potential targets for therapeutics.
Structural studies of DsbB have been performed in detergent and phospholipid environments by X-ray crystallography, solution NMR, and MAS solid-state NMR. The crystal structures include the DsbA–DsbB–ubiquinone complex (Inaba et al. Reference Inaba, Murakami, Suzuki, Nakagawa, Yamashita, Okada and Ito2006, Reference Inaba, Murakami, Nakagawa, Iida, Kinjo, Ito and Suzuki2009), the charge-transfer intermediate of DsbB (Malojčić et al. Reference Malojčić, Owen, Grimshaw and Glockshuber2008), and the DsbB–Fab complex (Inaba et al. Reference Inaba, Murakami, Nakagawa, Iida, Kinjo, Ito and Suzuki2009). The detergent DPC has also been used in determining the solution NMR structure (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Cierpicki, Jimenez, Lukasik, Ellena, Cafiso, Kadokura, Beckwith and Bushweller2008). Subsequently, Bushweller and co-workers have extended the study of DsbB to nanodiscs, which provide a planar bilayer environment amenable to solution NMR studies (Früh et al. Reference Früh, Zhou, Chen, Loch, Ab, Grinkova, Verheij, Sligar, Bushweller and Siegal2010). Rienstra and co-workers have utilized MAS solid-state NMR to study the structure of a DsbB–DsbA complex (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Sperling, Berthold, Schwieters, Nesbitt, Nieuwkoop, Gennis and Rienstra2011a) and features of the DsbB protein in endogenous lipid (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Nesbitt, Sperling, Berthold, Schwieters, Gennis and Rienstra2013b) (Fig. 10).
The improvement of the structure of the DsbB protein in endogenous lipid (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Nesbitt, Sperling, Berthold, Schwieters, Gennis and Rienstra2013b) over the previous crystal structure or solution NMR structure is of particular interest. Notably, the mutant form (C41S) of DsbB represents a transient intermediate. The NMR structure has defined the loop region between TM3 and TM4, which had been missing in the previous crystal structure due to the intrinsic dynamics of this region of the protein. The new structure (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Nesbitt, Sperling, Berthold, Schwieters, Gennis and Rienstra2013b) was calculated using dihedral angle restraints and ambiguous distance restraints from solid-state NMR and the X-ray data from the DsbB(Cys41Ser)–Fab complex. MAS solid-state NMR restraints have improved backbone atom precision from 2·36 Å in the crystal structure to 1·35 Å. The improvement is mainly at the loops and turns where the crystal structure is weakly defined. Additionally, the crystal structure was obtained with the Fab antibody fragment attached, while the solid-state NMR structure was obtained with the unmodified protein in native lipid. This comparison of structures is an excellent example of the general trend observed in transitioning from modified to native, full-length protein.
DsbB has also been an important model membrane protein for MAS solid-state NMR methodology development. An important characterization of the temperature effects on the spectral quality of membrane proteins in lipid bilayers, especially in the presence of endogenous lipids, has also been made using a DsbB sample (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Sperling, Berthold, Nesbitt, Gennis and Rienstra2011b). Notably, this study aimed to capture the highest-resolution spectra of a membrane protein, which often occurs when the lipids are in the cooler gel phase. Interestingly, the study using DsbB concluded that the best-resolution spectra are acquired slightly below the phase transition temperature. Additionally, 3D and 4D experiments for MAS solid-state NMR, newly developed for resonance assignments, have been tested using DsbB (Li et al. Reference Li, Berthold, Gennis and Rienstra2008). The lipid insertion depth of DsbB has been studied by proton spin diffusion experiments using water and the lipid acyl chain (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Nesbitt, Sperling, Berthold, Schwieters, Gennis and Rienstra2013b), and these experiments have been built upon their earlier applications to the potassium channel KS (Ader et al. Reference Ader, Schneider, Seidel, Etzkorn, Becker and Baldus2008). The structural calculation method using joint refinement with solid-state NMR and X-ray crystallography data has also been applied to DsbB studies for the first time (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Sperling, Berthold, Schwieters, Nesbitt, Nieuwkoop, Gennis and Rienstra2011a).
Structure of DsbB determined using a combinatorial approach employing X-ray crystallography, solid-state NMR, and MD simulations. The UQ cofactor and bond between Tyr153 and Glu26 are shown. From Tang et al. (Reference Tang, Comellas and Rienstra2013a, Reference Tang, Nesbitt, Sperling, Berthold, Schwieters, Gennis and Rienstrab).
2.10 Sensory rhodopsin
Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) is a seven TM helical, retinal containing protein responsible for relaying information to the cell about the intensity and color of light in the environment (Etzkorn et al. Reference Etzkorn, Martell, Andronesi, Seidel, Engelhard and Baldus2007; Spudich & Luecke, Reference Spudich and Luecke2002). Progress toward structure determination of Nastronomonas pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II (pSRII) was initially made using solid-state NMR performed on 13C/15N-labeled pSRII reconstituted into proteoliposomes (purple membrane lipids) in order to obtain resonance assignments for approximately 40% of the protein (Etzkorn et al. Reference Etzkorn, Martell, Andronesi, Seidel, Engelhard and Baldus2007). Soon after, backbone assignments of pSRII in DHPC were reported using solution state NMR methods with more than 98% of the backbone resonances being assigned (Gautier et al. Reference Gautier, Kirkpatrick and Nietlispach2008). Ultimately, Nietlispach and co-workers reported the complete structure of pSRII in DHPC micelles using solution state NMR (Gautier et al. Reference Gautier, Mott, Bostock, Kirkpatrick and Nietlispach2010). The Ladizhansky group has characterized the Anabaena sensory rhodopsin using solid-state NMR techniques. Their studies have included comparison of the conformation in a lipid environment versus a crystalline environment (Shi et al. Reference Shi, Kawamura, Jung, Brown and Ladizhansky2011), and structure determination (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Munro, Shi, Kawamura, Okitsu, Wada, Kim, Jung, Brown and Ladizhansky2013a) which revealed a seven TM helical trimer conformation in the lipid environment as shown in Fig. 11.
Solid-state NMR structure of Anabaena sensory rhodopsin. Side view of monomeric protein with retinal shown in orange. From Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Munro, Shi, Kawamura, Okitsu, Wada, Kim, Jung, Brown and Ladizhansky2013a).
2.11 CXCR1
G-Protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a class of integral membrane proteins composed of seven TM helical domains that are involved in signaling for a number of essential biological processes and functioning as drug receptors. As such, their structural and functional studies are of the essence and, to date, ~40% of drugs target GPCRs.
The complete structure of the GPCR CXCR1 has been determined using solid-state NMR spectroscopy in phospholipid bilayers without any modification of its sequence (Park et al. Reference Park, Das, Casagrande, Tian, Nothnagel, Chu, Kiefer, Maier, De Angelis, Marassi and Opella2012). Using RA solid-state NMR, it was determined that the structure of CXCR1 has a 3D-fold characteristic of a GPCR, having seven TM alpha helices connected by three intracellular (ICL1–ICL3) and three extracellular (ELC1–ECL3) loops (Park et al. Reference Park, Das, Casagrande, Tian, Nothnagel, Chu, Kiefer, Maier, De Angelis, Marassi and Opella2012) (Fig. 12).
Studies of CXCR1 also involved assessment of the dynamics and assignment of the mobile N- and C-termini using a combination of solution and solid-state NMR approaches in q=0·1 DMPC/DHPC isotropic bicelles (Park et al. Reference Park, Casagrande, Das, Albrecht, Chu and Opella2011b) as well as looking at the interactions between the receptor and its ligand, interleukin-8 (Park et al. Reference Park, Casagrande, Das, Albrecht, Chu and Opella2011b) which further confirmed previous studies that implied the N-terminal region as being the key site of interaction between ligand and receptor (Park et al. Reference Park, Casagrande, Cho, Albrecht and Opella2011a; Rajarathnam et al. Reference Rajarathnam, Clark-Lewis and Sykes1995; Skelton et al. Reference Skelton, Quan, Reilly and Lowman1999).
NMR structure of the GPCR CXCR1 in phospholipid bilayers determined using RA solid state NMR. From Park et al. (Reference Park, Das, Casagrande, Tian, Nothnagel, Chu, Kiefer, Maier, De Angelis, Marassi and Opella2012).
3. Future perspectives
The progress in the development of instrumentation, experimental methods, and calculation methods is sufficiently advanced to determine the backbone structures of a number of membrane proteins. Most importantly, initial studies of side chains and of complexes have been reported. This indicates that very high resolution and biologically relevant studies will be feasible in the near future. The ability to determine the structures of unmodified membrane proteins in liquid crystalline phospholipid bilayers under physiological conditions of temperature and pH is an enormous advantage over competitive methods. The field of NMR studies of membrane proteins in their native environment is poised for rapid advances.
4. Acknowledgements
The research described in this review that was performed at the University of California, San Diego was supported by Grant nos R01GM066978, RO1EB005161, and R01GM099986 from the National Institutes of Health. It utilized the Biomedical Technology Resource for NMR Molecular Imaging of Proteins at the University of California, San Diego supported by P41EB002031.
