Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:10:21.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of potential waterlogging-tolerant accessions of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) from diverse germplasm in a quest for resilient crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2025

Nitin Gadol
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Anshuman Shah
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, India
Pragya Mishra
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Geet Priya
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Harinder Vishwakarma
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Artika Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, RLBCAU, Jhansi, India
Rajeev Kumar
Affiliation:
Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, India
Mahesh Rao
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Nagendra Singh
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Rangan Parimalan
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Rashmi Yadav
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
Sanjay Kalia
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India
Vandna Rai*
Affiliation:
ICAR – National Institute of Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India
*
Corresponding author: Vandna Rai; Email: vandnarai2006@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Waterlogging (WL) stress drastically impacts sesame crops, making them highly susceptible by hindering growth and development. Hence, identifying and characterizing the promising trait is necessary to conserve germplasm exploitation during WL stress conditions. The current study emphasized comprehensively screening 148 accessions by treating 48 hours of WL stress in sesame crops. In addition, the trait association and morphological characteristics were attributed to identify tolerant and susceptible germplasm, which can be further utilized in crop improvement and breeding programmes. Therefore, the present study screened the genotypes by assessing morphological traits, including shoot height (SH), root length (RL), SPAD measurements and branches per plant. The observation reveals that RL, SH and SPAD significantly varied in sesame accessions. Hence, accession EC377024 and IC129289 showed highly tolerant and susceptible behaviour. The statistical analysis, including G × E interactions, Pearson’s correlation, and principal component analysis (PCA), supports the selected trait that can be used to screen the WL susceptible crops. The genotypes identified in this study have the potential to aid in sesame crop improvement.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Vandna Rai, 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Experimental design for WL stress in sesame accessions. (A) strategy to challenge WL stress in sesame accessions. (B) genotypes characterization comparison with respect to control and 48 h of WL stress. Where HT is highly tolerant, T is tolerant, MT is moderately tolerant and S is a susceptible genotype.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Box-plot represents the 143 accessions of the selected traits which were affected during waterlogging stress, including SH in cm, RL in cm, BPP and SPAD units with respect to their control conditions.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Hierarchical cluster representation of 143 sesame accessions using the unweighted pair group method (UPGMA) with arithmetic mean values of the phenotypic traits. The dendrogram represents the four groups and each group indicates the genotype behaviour. Red, green, blue and purple colour indicates highly tolerant, tolerant, moderately tolerant and susceptible genotypes.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Correlation circle of PCA. PCA indicates the four different variables, including SPAD, RL, SH and BPP. PC1 and PC2 represent 30.5% and 26% of the variance. Cos 2 value indicates the good quality demonstration of the individual traits in the plot. The plot explained the relationship between the variables and PC using length and vector direction. The vector direction illustrates the strength and the correlation’s nature between a specific PC and the original variable. A stronger correlation is indicated by measuring proximity to the components. Besides, the higher the vector length, the stronger the correlation, i.e., variables (traits) with longer vectors are significantly contributing to the variability indicated by PC. (A) Individual-PCA; (B) Variable-PCA.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Genotype × environment interaction. (A) percentage variations among the genotypes, environment and interactions of the SPAD, BPP, SH and RL. The graph indicates the variations observed during WL stress treatment in the sesame accessions. (B) Pearson’s correlation heatmap of diverse sesame accessions. The traits were calculated after challenging the plants to 48 hours of WL stress. The blue colour represents the positive correlation, and the red colour represents the negative correlation for the selected traits.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Diversity in the seed coat colour of sesame genotypes.

Supplementary material: File

Gadol et al. supplementary material

Gadol et al. supplementary material
Download Gadol et al. supplementary material(File)
File 16 KB