Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:47:45.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sandstone composition of the Upper Jurassic Emuerhe Formation from the Mohe Basin, China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2013

MING MING ZHANG
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
ZHAO JUN LIU*
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
SHI FANG
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
QIU SHI SUN
Affiliation:
College of Earth Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
*
*Author for correspondence: 915824051@qq.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sandstone composition analysis carried out on the samples from three different sections (western section, middle section and eastern section) of the Upper Jurassic Emuerhe Formation in the Mohe Basin, northeastern China, reveals that the Okhotsk orogenic belt and the Ergun massif basement are the source areas for the Emuerhe Formation. The source area of the western section and the A segment of the middle section is the Okhotsk orogenic belt. The tectonic attributes of the Okhotsk orogenic belt are those of a dissected arc. The transportation distance of clastic rocks from these sections gradually lengthened, and the uplift rate of the Okhotsk orogenic belt gradually increased. The source area of the eastern section and the B segment of the middle section is the Ergun massif basement. Compared with the Okhotsk orogenic belt, the tectonic attributes and uplift rate of the Ergun massif basement are different from the former. The attributes of the Ergun massif basement are those of basement uplift. The transportation distance of clastic rocks from the eastern section and the B segment of the middle section gradually shortened, and the uplift rate of the Ergun massif basement gradually decreased. These conclusions are consistent with the characteristics of a foreland basin. Thus, we can draw the conclusion that the Mohe Basin belongs to the foreland basin.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geological sketch maps of the studied area with location of the studied sections (modified from Xie, 2000; Hou et al. 2010a).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Stratigraphic sections of the Emuerhe Formation with location of the studied samples.

Figure 2

Table 1. Sandstone composition of the Emuerhe Formation in the Mohe Basin

Figure 3

Figure 3. Photomicrographs of sand grains of the Emuerhe Formation: (a) lithic arkose sandstones from the western section; (b) arkosic sandstones from the western section; (c) arkosic sandstones from the middle section; (d) lithic arkose sandstones from the middle section; (e) arkosic sandstones from the eastern section; (f) arkosic sandstones from the eastern section. (Q – quartz; Pl – plagioclase; Mi – microcline.)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Mineralogical classification of the Emuerhe Formation sandstones based on the Folk diagram (1974): Q – total quartz; F – feldspar; R – rock fragments. I – quartz sandstone; II – feldspathic quartz sandstone; III – lithic quartz sandstone; IV – arkosic sandstone; V – lithic arkose sandstone; VI – feldspar lithic sandstone; VII – lithic sandstone. The rock classification names are modified from Zeng & Xia (1998) and Lu & Sang (2002). Figure A: Sandstone components classification for the sandstones from the western section; Figure B: Sandstone components classification for the sandstones from the middle section; Figure C: Sandstone components classification for the sandstones from the eastern section.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The inverse sequence section relationship between the Emuerhe Formation stratigraphic sections and the source areas.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Triangular diagrams of the sandstones from the Emuerhe Formation in Mohe Basin. (a, c, e) Framework-grain assemblage Q–F–L. (b, d, f) Framework-grain assemblage Qm–F–Lt. Tectonic setting fields are from Dickinson (1988). (a, b) Samples form the western section. (c, d) Samples form the middle section. (e, f) Samples form the middle section.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Vertical variation of sandstone components from the Emuerhe Formation in the western section.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Vertical variation of sandstone components from the Emuerhe Formation in the middle section.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Vertical variation of sandstone components from the Emuerhe Formation in the eastern section.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Schematic sketch of provenance analysis of the sandstones from the Emuerhe Formation in the Mohe Basin.