Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:25:18.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors associated with acquisition of waterborne healthcare-associated infection or colonization in high-risk units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2019

Lina M. ParraOpen the ORCID record for Lina M. Parra[Opens in a new window],
Mireia Cantero,
Juliana Sierra,
Ángel Asensio and
Fernando J. García
Lina M. Parra*
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Mireia Cantero
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Juliana Sierra
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Ángel Asensio
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
Fernando J. García
Affiliation:
National Epidemiology Centre, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Lina M. Parra, Email: linamarcela.parra@salud.madrid.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this meta-analysis, central venous catheter exposure (pooled odds ratio, 8.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19–29.31; P < .01) in neonates and length of stay (standardized mean difference, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.26–1.05; P = .01) in an adult population were associated with acquisition of waterborne healthcare-associated infections or colonization in ICUs. The quality of evidence was low.

Information

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , February 2020, pp. 222 - 225
Copyright
© 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Hospital water systems are recognized as sources of healthcare-associated infections. Waterborne outbreaks are a threat to high-risk patients and the risk factors have been described in a previous systematic review,Reference Kanamori, Weber and Rutala1 but this association has never been quantitatively estimated. We systematically reviewed the scientific literature to determine the types of exposure that represent a risk to patients on high-risk units and to quantitatively estimate their risk.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the scientific literature with the primary objective of identifying risk factors for the acquisition of waterborne HAI or colonization in high-risk units. Our data sources were PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for the period extending from 1966 to July 10, 2018. Water supplies and sources included pipes and plumbing fixtures, with a focus on taps and sinks. Three independent reviewers screened and selected the clinical studies, and 2 authors extracted data; disagreements were resolved by discussion. If consensus was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted. The review exclusively considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and analytical observational studies. We excluded articles related to Legionella pneumophila and Staphylococcus aureus.

We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the overall quality of evidence. An NOS score ≥7 indicates a higher study quality; scores range from 0 to 10 for both case-control and cohort studies. Two reviewers assessed risk of bias in all reviewed studies. We grouped studies depending on populations (ie, adult, pediatric, and neonatal populations) and study type.

Clinical and methodological heterogeneity was evident across studies, so we used a random effects model. We obtained summary estimates using a form of inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic odds ratios (ORs). We evaluated the heterogeneity among studies using the Q test (Cochran’s χ2 test) and the Higgins I 2 statistic (range, 0–100%). I 2 values were interpreted as low (<25%), moderate (25%–50%), and high heterogeneity (50%–75%). We did not assess potential publication bias due to the small number of studies included. We used Review Manager software (Revman 5.3; Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) to draw forest plots and perform statistical analyses.

Results

We identified 301 potentially relevant studies and selected 10 eligible studies for review (Supplemental Fig. 1 online). The characteristics of the studies and NOS scores are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristic of study participants of case-control and cohort studies examining waterborne healthcare associated colonization and/or infections

Note. NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; SICU, surgical intensive care unit; MICU, medical intensive care unit; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Neonatal population

Three case-control studies reported risk factors related to the water system as the reservoir and acquisition of waterborne-HAI or colonization in neonates.Reference Von Dolinger Brito, Matos, Abdalla, Filho and Pinto2–Reference Kinsey Bicking, Koirala and Solomon4 Waterborne HAI and colonization were linked to contaminated tap water and the hospital wastewater system. Gram-negative bacilli (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens) were the most frequently identified pathogens.

The risk factors reported in the reviewed studies included care in a room with no point-of-use filter installed on the sink faucet during the 7 days before positive culture (OR, 37.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.16–196.93)Reference Kinsey Bicking, Koirala and Solomon4, invasive ventilation (OR, 5.79; 95% CI, 1.29–30.62) after adjustment for gestational age,Reference Kinsey Bicking, Koirala and Solomon4 and exposure to humidity (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 0.47–7.91) (Supplemental Fig. 2 online).Reference Kinsey Bicking, Koirala and Solomon4

Two case-control studies addressed the association between central venous catheter (CVC) exposure and waterborne HAI or colonization.Reference Maltezou, Tryfinopoulou and Katerelos3, Reference Kinsey Bicking, Koirala and Solomon4 The summary OR was 8.02 (95% CI, 2.19–29.31), with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). CVC exposure had an attributable fraction for waterborne HAI or colonization acquisition of 35.5% (95% CI, 31.8%– 49.4%). The summary OR for exposure to an umbilical catheter was 2.41 (95% CI, 0.20–28.33).Reference Maltezou, Tryfinopoulou and Katerelos3, Reference Kinsey Bicking, Koirala and Solomon4 Two case-control studies assessed the association between total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and waterborne HAIsReference Maltezou, Tryfinopoulou and Katerelos3, Reference Kinsey Bicking, Koirala and Solomon4; the summary OR was 11.52 (95% CI, 0.55–240.94) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Forest plot of types of exposure related to waterborne-HAIs in Neonatal population admitted to NICU

  1. a. Central vascular catheter exposure

  2. b. Umbilical catheter exposure

  3. c. Total parenteral nutrition exposure

Adult population admitted to ICU

  1. a. Age (years)

  2. b. Length of stay overall (days)

CI: confidence interval, IV: interval variable

Adult population

We identified 5 cohort studiesReference Berthelot, Grattard and Mahul5–Reference Zhou, Hu, Gao, Bao, Chen and Li9 and 2 case-control studiesReference Dandalides, Rutala and Sarubbi10, Reference Salm, Deja and Gastmeier11 that reported plausible evidence of risk factors related to waterborne HAI or colonization in adults. Waterborne HAI and colonization were linked to contaminated tap water and the hospital wastewater system (ie, soiled utility sink and sinks in patient rooms). Gram-negative bacilli (eg, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterobacter spp) were the most frequently detected pathogens.

Environmental exposures associated with acquisition were contaminated tap water in patient rooms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.09–2.84)Reference Reuter, Sigge, Wiedeck and Trautmann6 and stay in a room with a contaminated sink (OR, 11.2; 95% CI, 1.92–65.68).Reference Salm, Deja and Gastmeier11 HemofiltrationReference Salm, Deja and Gastmeier11 (OR, 22.9; 95% CI, 1.63–293.91) and cumulative duration of mechanical ventilation for ≥10 days (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.46–4.50)Reference Venier, Leroywe and Slekovec8 were also reported as a risk factors for acquisition (Supplemental Fig. 3 online).

A retrospective case-control studyReference Salm, Deja and Gastmeier11 examined the association between immunosuppression and the risk for colonization or infection by the outbreak strain (OR, 7.87; 95% CI, 0.942–65.73), and only 1 prospective study reported duration of antibiotic treatment associated with a decrease of risk of P. aeruginosa (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69–0.87).Reference Berthelot, Grattard and Mahul5

Two case-control studies contributed to a meta-analysis. The length of stay before colonization was also identified as a risk factor (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.26–1.05; P = .01) for case-control studies (Fig. 1).

We could not calculate summaries of other exposures mentioned in previous articlesReference Kanamori, Weber and Rutala1 because they were not analytical observational studies in this regard.

Quality of evidence

The quality of evidence as defined by GRADE rating system for every exposure was low, depending on the risk factor (Supplemental Fig. 4 online).

Discussion

The principal contaminated reservoirs of water system reported and included in this systematic review were the distal ends (ie, tap water) and sink drains.

The absence of protective barriers installed on the distal ends of a plumbing installation could play an important role for microorganism dispersion and colonization or infection by a waterborne microorganism.

We highlight the relevance of these aqueous reservoirs not only for the identification of several enterobacteria and nonfermentive gram-negative bacilliReference Roux, Aubier, Cochard, Quentin and van der Mee-Marquet12 but also because most outbreaks due to contaminated sinks are related to multidrug-resistant organisms.Reference Berthelot, Grattard and Mahul5 Therefore, barriers that reduce contamination of the areas around the sink by splashes from the drain should be considered to prevent patient or device contamination.

Although exposure to invasive procedures was associated with acquisition, these life support systems could act not only as risk factors but also as markers to identify more vulnerable neonates. Longer exposure to the ICU environment, especially if sources of water contamination are present, facilitates the acquisition of waterborne pathogens. Staying in a room where the sink or the tap water are contaminated was the most relevant environmental exposure. These findings are consistent with previous studies reporting that the distance between the sink and the patient bed was very often between 1 and 2 m, so close that it allows water splashing around the sink to reach patients.Reference Roux, Aubier, Cochard, Quentin and van der Mee-Marquet12

Quantifying patient risk factors for waterborne-associated HAI or colonization in high-risk units could help clinicians estimate patient risk for acquisition and evaluate who needs enhanced prevention measures while admitted to these units. Exposures related to waterborne infection or colonization should give rise to the implementation of measures to strengthen key strategies for prevention of invasive device–associated HAIs. Improvement of hand hygiene, avoiding indwelling invasive device insertion, early removal of and/or alternatives to indwelling invasive devices should be considered.

The general limitations of our study include the small number of studies included, their clinical and methodological heterogeneity, and some potential publication bias that may not have been detected.

In conclusion, CVC exposure for neonatal patients and length of stay for the adult population are risk factors for waterborne HAI or colonization in high-risk units.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.326

Acknowledgments

None.

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Kanamori, H, Weber, DJ, Rutala, WA. Healthcare outbreaks associated with a water reservoir and infection prevention strategies. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:1423–1435.10.1093/cid/ciw122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Dolinger Brito, D, Matos, C, Abdalla, V, Filho, DA, Pinto, P. An outbreak of nosocomial infection caused by ESBLs producing Serratia marcescens in a Brazilian neonatal unit. Braz J Infect Dis 1999;3:149–155.Google Scholar
Maltezou, HC, Tryfinopoulou, K, Katerelos, P, et al.Consecutive Serratia marcescens multiclone outbreaks in a neonatal care unit. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:635–642.10.1016/j.ajic.2011.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey Bicking, C, Koirala, S, Solomon, B, et al.Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit attributed to hospital tap water. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:801–808.10.1017/ice.2017.87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthelot, P, Grattard, F, Mahul, P, et al.Prospective study of nosocomial colonization and Infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mechanically ventilated patients. Intens Care Med 2001;27:503–512.10.1007/s001340100870CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuter, S, Sigge, A, Wiedeck, H, Trautmann, M. Analysis of transmission pathways of Pseudomonas aeruginosa between patients and tap water outlets. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2222–2229.10.1097/00003246-200210000-00008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogues, AM, Boulestreau, H, Lashéras, A, et al.Contribution of tap water to patient colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a medical intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venier, AG, Leroywe, C, Slekovec, C, et al.Risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquisition in intensive care units: a prospective multicentre study. J Hosp Infect 2014;88:103–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Z, Hu, B, Gao, X, Bao, R, Chen, M, Li, H. Sources of sporadic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonizations/infections in surgical ICUs: association with contaminated sink trap. J Infect Chemother 2016;22:450e–455e.10.1016/j.jiac.2016.03.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dandalides, PC, Rutala, WA, Sarubbi, FA. Postoperative infections following cardiac surgery: association with an environmental reservoir in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Infect Control 1984;5:378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salm, F, Deja, M, Gastmeier, P, et al.Prolonged outbreak of clonal MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa on an intensive care unit: contaminated sinks and contaminated ultra-filtrate bags as possible route of transmission? Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:53–60.10.1186/s13756-016-0157-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, D, Aubier, B, Cochard, H, Quentin, R, van der Mee-Marquet, N. Contaminated sinks in intensive care units: an underestimated source of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing-Enterobacteriaceae in the patient environment. J Hosp Infect 2013;85:106–111.10.1016/j.jhin.2013.07.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1.Baseline characteristic of study participants of case-control and cohort studies examining waterborne healthcare associated colonization and/or infections

Figure 1

Fig. 1.Forest plot of types of exposure related to waterborne-HAIs in Neonatal population admitted to NICUa.Central vascular catheter exposureb.Umbilical catheter exposurec.Total parenteral nutrition exposureAdult population admitted to ICUa.Age (years)b.Length of stay overall (days)CI: confidence interval, IV: interval variable

Supplementary material: File

Parra et al. supplementary material

Parra et al. supplementary material

Download Parra et al. supplementary material(File)
File 778.4 KB