Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T19:15:42.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weibull analysis of fracture strength for Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 bulk metallic glass: Tension–compression asymmetry and porosity effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

Hui-Li Gao
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
Yong Shen
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
Jian Xu*
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: jianxu@imr.ac.cn

Abstract

In this work, two- and three-parameter Weibull statistics were used for analyzing the variability of fracture strength for Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 bulk metallic glass (BMG), both in compression and in tension testing. In contrast to the compression in which the specimens fail via the massive shear-off, however, failure mode in tension for the as-cast BMG is flaw-controlled crack opening (mode I or mixed mode) due to the presence of cast defects such as porosity. As a result, dispersion of compressive fracture strength is rather uniform. For the BMG rods of 6 mm in diameter, the three-parameter Weibull modulus m3p and threshold stress σμ (below which no failure occurs) are 3.4 and 1780 MPa, respectively. However, tensile fracture strength of the BMGs manifests a large variability, in a range of 310–1690 MPa. In terms of fracture surface morphology, the specimen failure at different stress is associated with two types of defects: large pores on/near the surface of specimens and small internal pores. Using bimodal and three-parameter Weibull analysis, the Weibull modulus m1 and threshold σμ1 at lower strength level are 1.8 and 250 MPa, respectively, suggesting a modest reliability. One should exercise caution, therefore, in interpreting the reliability of as-cast BMG materials only simply in terms of the compression tests, small-sized samples, and tow-parameter Weibull analysis. Like the conventional metal castings, controlling the processing conditions to minimize the cast defects is critical issue to ensure the reliability of BMG materials.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. A set of x-ray diffraction patterns taken from cross-sectional surfaces in the central portion of Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 as-cast BMG rods of 6 mm in diameter, with an interval of 10 mm from rod bottom along longitudinal axis.

Figure 1

TABLE I. Relevant material properties for the Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 bulk metallic glass.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Appearance of tension-test specimen machined from as-cast BMG rods with 6 mm in diameter and ∼100 mm in length.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Compressive engineering stress–strain curves of tested Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG specimens: (a) as-cast rods with a diameter of 4 mm, (b) as-cast rods with a diameter of 6 mm, and (c) 4-mm-diameter cylindrical specimens machined from 6-mm as-cast rods.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the (a) side views and (b) fracture surface for Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG specimens cut from 4-mm rods after compression testing. (c) and (d) are high-magnification images for area blocked in (b), showing the “cold-shear” area and vein patterns, respectively.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Weibull probability plots for compressive fracture strength of Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG. The two- and three-parameter fits are indicated: (a) as-cast rods with a diameter of 4 mm, (b) as-cast rods with a diameter of 6 mm, and (c) 4-mm-diameter cylindrical specimens machined from 6-mm as-cast rods.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. SEM images of (a) side view and (b) fracture surface for Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG specimens cut from 6-mm rods. (c) and (d) are high-magnification images showing the “cold-shear” area and a cast defect, respectively.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. X-ray computed tomography images of a Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG specimen cut from 6-mm rods after compression test: (a) three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction, and (b), (c), and (d) projection at cross section containing pores labeled as 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in (a).

Figure 8

FIG. 8. SEM images of (a) side views and (b) fracture surface for Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG 4-mm specimens machined from 6-mm rods after compression testing. (c) and (d) are high-magnification images for area blocked in (b), showing the “cold-shear” area and vein patterns, respectively.(color online)

Figure 9

TABLE II. Compressive fracture strength and Weibull distribution parameters for the Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 bulk metallic glass under different conditions of tested specimens.

Figure 10

FIG. 9. Tensile engineering stress–strain curves of 26 tested Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG specimens, machined from 6-mm as-cast rods, with gauge section of 3 mm in diameter and 15 mm in length.

Figure 11

FIG. 10. (a) Optical photo and (b) SEM images of top view of a fractured specimen after tension testing for Zr55Ti2 Co28Al15 BMG. (c) and (d) are high-magnification SEM images for area blocked in (b), showing the shear-offset areas near a cast defect and dimple patterns, respectively.

Figure 12

FIG. 11. (a) Optical photo and (b) SEM images of top view of a fractured specimen after tension testing for Zr55Ti2 Co28Al15 BMG. (c) and (d) are high-magnification SEM images for area blocked in (b), showing small internal pore and dimple patterns, respectively.

Figure 13

FIG. 12. Weibull probability plots for tensile fracture strength of Zr55Ti2Co28Al15 BMG: (a) two- and three-parameter fits and (b) bimodal three-parameter fit.