Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T09:59:19.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii in faecal samples using nested multiplex PCR in west of Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2019

Fares Bahrami
Affiliation:
Zoonoses Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, IranDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Ali Haghighi
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Ghasem Zamini*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
Mohammadbagher Khademerfan
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, IranCellular and Molecular Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Ghasem Zamini, E-mail: kurdistan_parasitologist@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii (collectively referred to as Entamoeba complex), using microscopic and molecular methods in Kurdistan Province, northwest of Iran. The relationship between positive Entamoeba species and clinical symptoms was also investigated. Eight positive Entamoeba complex, as well as four Entamoeba complex-like isolates, were detected by microscopic stool examination. DNA was extracted from all positive and from 55 randomly selected negative stool samples. PCR was performed using species-specific 18S rRNA primers for the Entamoeba complex. All positive PCR samples were sequenced. In total, 14 (1.01%) out of 1383 isolates, i.e. 12 microscopy-positive and Entamoeba complex-like isolates and two out of 55 microscopy-negative isolates, were identified via PCR and sequencing. Overall, 0.58% (8/1383) of the isolates were E. dispar, 0.14% (2/1383) E. histolytica, 0.07% (1/1383) E. moshkovskii and 0.22% (3/1383) were mixed of E. histolytica and E. dispar. Based on our findings, the prevalence of E. dispar is greater than that of E. histoltyica. On the other hand, a case of E. moshkovskii was reported for the first time in this region. It seems that some gastrointestinal symptoms may be attributed to Entamoeba species.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019
Figure 0

Table 1.Distribution of Entamoeba complex according to the multiplex PCR

Figure 1

Table 2.Frequency of Entamoeba complex isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic attended individuals

Figure 2

Table 3.Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with Entamoeba complex infection among individuals attended to the medical laboratories in Sanandaj County, Kurdistan, Northwest Iran(n = 1383)

Supplementary material: File

Bahrami et al. supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Bahrami et al. supplementary material(File)
File 43.4 KB