Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:40:23.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Respiration rates in marine heterotrophic bacteria relate to the cytometric characteristics of bacterioplankton communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2009

Mathilde Schapira*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Thomas Pollet
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia UMR CARRTEL, Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques des Ecosystèmes Limniques, Station d'Hydrologie Lacustre, Université de Savoie, 75 Avenue de Corzent, BP 511, 74203 Thonon les Bains Cedex, France
James G. Mitchell
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
L. Seuront
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia South Australian Research and Development Institute, Aquatic Sciences, West Beach, SA 5022, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Schapira, Southern Ocean Research Group, Department of Entomology and Zoology, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown, 6040, South Africa email: M.Schapira@ru.ac.za
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Respiration in marine bacteria (fraction <0.6 µm) was investigated in 5 distinct coastal ecosystems. Respiration rates were estimated from the decrease of dissolved oxygen (O2) concentrations measured with a fibre-optic oxygen sensor (optode) during short-term incubations (5 to 6 hours) in the dark. Sub-populations of heterotrophic bacteria were defined and enumerated by flow cytometric analysis. Respiration rates ranged from 0.04 to 0.14 µmol O2 l−1 h−1 and were not correlated to total bacteria abundances. In contrast, they significantly increased with the relative proportion of HDNA cells (i.e. high deoxyribonucleic acid content) within the bacterioplankton community. These results stress the need to relate bacterial respiration rates to the absolute and relative abundance of the different cytometrically defined sub-populations found in bacterial assemblages, rather than to total cell counts. This result indicates that only a fraction of bacterial cells may contribute to bacterial respiration, which indicates a reconsideration of the relevance of some previous estimates of bulk bacterial respiration and the related biogeochemical fluxes may be required.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Study area and location of the 5 sampling sites (⋆). (1) Sheltered marina (Adelaide area); (2) seagrass bed (Port Lincoln Jetty); (3) sandflat; (4) mudflat; (5) rocky shore (Port Lincoln area).

Figure 1

Table 1. Salinity (S), temperature (T; °C), ammonium (NH4+), nitrite+nitrate (NO3−+NO2−), phosphate (PO43−) concentrations (µM) and chlorophyll-a (Chl a) concentrations (µg l−1) measured at the 5 sampling sites (no replicates). DL, detection limit. Abundances of total bacteria (total), low DNA (LDNA) and high DNA (HDNA) bacteria, and percentage of HDNA bacteria (% HDNA) after flow cytometry analysis of samples from the 5 sampling sites (average±SD calculated on 3 samples). For the marina HDNA abundances represent the sum of HDNA1 and HDNA2.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Cytometric differentiation of heterotrophic bacterial populations in (A) the sandflat site (as a representative of all other sampling sites) and (B) in the sheltered marina. Histogram plots of green-fluorescence (SYBR Green) show peak related to LDNA (low DNA) observed in all sampling sites (A and B), and 1 (A) population or 2 (B) populations of increasing DNA content (HDNA1 and HDNA2). VLP, virus-like particles.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Two different temporal trends of oxygen concentrations ([O2]; µmol l−1) observed during in situ incubations. (A) In the marina and the rocky shore sites, the slope was maximal at the beginning of the incubation and exponentially decreased thereafter. An exponential model was therefore fitted on the entire data set; (B) in the sandflat, mudflat and seagrass bed sites, oxygen decrease was only observed after a time lag, and the exponential decay was then fitted on the last part of the curve. The symbols are the mean values and the error bars are the standard errors calculated from the oxygen concentrations measured in the 3 BOD bottles for each incubation time.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Bacterial respiration rates (BR, µmol O2 l−1 h−1) shown as a function of the percentages of HDNA cells (% HDNA) at the 5 sampling sites; mudflat, rocky shore, sheltered marina and seagrass bed and sandflat.

Figure 5

Table 2. Literature review of (i) methods applied, i.e. filtration mesh size (µm), incubation time (incubation), volume, data points and method used to estimate oxygen consumption and (ii) respiration rates (BR; µmol l−1 h−1) estimated in different natural environments and in this study.