Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:44:12.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Density and distribution patterns of the endangered species Pinna nobilis within a Posidonia oceanica meadow in the Gulf of Oristano (Italy)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2010

S. Coppa*
Affiliation:
IAMC–CNR, Institute for Coastal Marine Environment–National Research Council (Oristano Section), Loc. Sa Mardini, 09072 Torregrande (Oristano, Italy) Fondazione IMC, International Marine Centre Onlus, Loc. Sa Mardini, 09072 Torregrande (Oristano, Italy)
I. Guala
Affiliation:
Fondazione IMC, International Marine Centre Onlus, Loc. Sa Mardini, 09072 Torregrande (Oristano, Italy)
G.A. de Lucia
Affiliation:
IAMC–CNR, Institute for Coastal Marine Environment–National Research Council (Oristano Section), Loc. Sa Mardini, 09072 Torregrande (Oristano, Italy)
G. Massaro
Affiliation:
Penisola del Sinis–Isola di Mal di Ventre MPA, Piazza E. D'Arborea, 1 09072 Cabras (Oristano, Italy)
M. Bressan
Affiliation:
University of Padova, Department of Biology, Via U. Bassi 58/B, 35121 (Padova, Italy)
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: S. Coppa, IAMC–CNR, Institute for Coastal Marine Environment–National Research Council (Oristano Section), Loc. Sa Mardini, 09072 Torregrande (Oristano, Italy) email: s.coppa@iamc.cnr.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pinna nobilis is an endemic bivalve of the Mediterranean Sea. In the last decades P. nobilis populations have declined drastically due to increasing anthropogenic pressure and it has been declared a protected species since 1992. Despite the need for conservation, knowledge of the ecology and monitoring of the main populations of P. nobilis are limited. This study considered a population living within a Posidonia oceanica meadow in the Gulf of Oristano (western Mediterranean, Italy). The study area, about 150 hectares, part of which is included within a Marine Protected Area and a Site of Community Importance, was subdivided in 3 sub-areas. The percentage cover of different habitat types (P. oceanica, dead matte and sand) in each sub-area was measured and meadow features (substrate coverage, matte compactness and shoot density) characterized. The hypotheses of differences in density, percentage of dead individuals, population structure, shell burial level and orientation of P. nobilis, were investigated according to sub-areas and to habitat type. The spatial distribution was patchy, and the habitat type resulted a key factor in determining both density and distribution. A strong edge effect was demonstrated: more than half of the observed individuals colonized the P. oceanica border. Matte compactness and shoot density were found to affect the density and distribution of P. nobilis. Shell burial level and percentage of dead individuals varied with sub-areas and habitat types. Size distribution was bimodal and common shell orientation was observed in two sub-areas. These results contribute to increase the knowledge of population ecology of this species and to provide useful information for implementing conservation policies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location map of the study area. (A) Western Mediterranean Sea, the arrow indicates the Gulf of Oristano; (B) northern part of the Gulf of Oristano and limits of the Penisola del Sinis-Isola di Mal di Ventre Marine Protected Area and Mistras Site of Community Importance; (C) study area with included sub-areas (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm, Mar Morto).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Biometry of Pinna nobilis (w, minimum width; UL, unburied length; HT, total length; Or, orientation direction).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Percentage cover of different substrates (i.e. Posidonia oceanica, sand and dead matte) in the sub-areas considered (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm; Mar Morto).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Meadow density per sub-areas (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm, Mar Morto) and depths.

Figure 4

Table 1. Results of analyses of variance and Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) tests on shoot density and matte compactness.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Matte compactness per sub-areas (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm, Mar Morto) and depths.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Density of Pinna nobilis (□ = 25%–75%; □ = median;  = minimum–maximum) per sub-areas (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm, Mar Morto). Statistical differences among sub-areas are reported (**, P < 0.01; ns, not significant).

Figure 7

Table 2. Number of recorded Pinna nobilis per substrate (P, Posidonia oceanica; S, sand; M, dead matte; Edge, P. oceanica edge: boundary between P. oceanica and sand or dead matte). The surface area of each substrate was calculated from the mean values obtained from the point intercept transects.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Percentage of dead individuals of Pinna nobilis (□ = 25%–75%; □ = median;  = minimum–maximum) per sub-areas (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm, Mar Morto). Data were arc-sin transformed (Zar, 1999). Statistical differences among sub-areas are reported (*, P < 0.05; ns, not significant).

Figure 9

Table 3. Result of Chi-square test (O, observed frequencies; E, expected frequencies) to test Pinna nobilis dead individuals according to habitat types (P, Posidonia oceanica; M, dead matte; Edge, P. oceanica edge) and sub-areas.

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Percentage frequencies of size-classes (5 cm) in populations of Pinna nobilis according to depth levels (A) and sub-areas (B).

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Burial level (%) of the shells of Pinna nobilis (□ = 25%–75%; □ = median;  = minimum–maximum) per sub-areas (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm = Mar Morto). Data were arc-sin transformed (Zar, 1999). Statistical differences among sub-areas are reported (***, P < 0.001).

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Burial level (%) of the shells of Pinna nobilis (□ = 25%–75%; □ = median;  = min-max) per habitat types (P, Posidonia oceanica; M, dead matte; Edge, P. oceanica edge). Data were arc-sin transformed (Zar, 1999). Statistical differences among sub-areas are reported (***, P < 0.001; ns, not significant).

Figure 13

Table 4. Result of Chi-square test for the analysis of differences in shell orientation within sub-areas (O, observed frequencies; E, expected frequencies).

Figure 14

Table 5. Results of Morisita's index (MI). Note that transects 7 and 14 were considered as the limits between sub-areas (Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros; Mm, Mar Morto).

Figure 15

Fig. 11. Scatter plot of the canonical axes for the Canonical Analysis of Principal coordinates (CAP) discriminant analysis.

Figure 16

Table 6. Results of Canonical Analysis of Principal coordinates (CAP). m, number of principal coordinate axes used in the CAP procedure; %Var, percentage of the total variation explained by the first m principal coordinate axes. Allocation success, percentage of points correctly allocated in each group; δ2, squared canonical correlation; Tv, Torre Vecchia; Th, Tharros;. Mm, Mar Morto.