Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:46:44.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Smelling the future: subtle life-history adjustments in response to environmental conditions and perceived transmission opportunities in a trematode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2016

C. LAGRUE*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
R. RINNEVALLI
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
R. POULIN
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. E-mail: clement.lagrue@gmail.com

Summary

A number of parasites with complex life cycles can abbreviate their life cycles to increase the likelihood of reproducing. For example, some trematodes can facultatively skip the definitive host and produce viable eggs while still inside their intermediate host. The resulting shorter life cycle is clearly advantageous when transmission probabilities to the definitive hosts are low. Coitocaecum parvum can mature precociously (progenesis), and produce eggs by selfing inside its amphipod second intermediate host. Environmental factors such as definitive host density and water temperature influence the life-history strategy adopted by C. parvum in their crustacean host. However, it is also possible that information about transmission opportunities gathered earlier in the life cycle (i.e. by cercariae-producing sporocysts in the first intermediate host) could have priming effects on the adoption of one or the other life strategy. Here we document the effects of environmental parameters (host chemical cues and temperature) on cercarial production within snail hosts and parasite life-history strategy in the amphipod host. We found that environmental cues perceived early in life have limited priming effects on life-history strategies later in life and probably account for only a small part of the variation among conspecific parasites. External cues gathered at the metacercarial stage seem to largely override potential effects of the environmental conditions experienced by early stages of the parasite.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Table 1. Detail of the number (N) of amphipod hosts alive (surviving) and infected at the end of the experiment and of the number (n) of Coitocaecum parvum metacercariae that successfully infected the amphipods in the two treatments (control vs fish) and under the two temperature regimes (18 or 22 °C) under which snails used to obtain cercariae for experimental infections were maintained.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Cercarial output (mean number of cercariae released per individual snail ± s.e.) of Coitocaecum parvum-infected snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) exposed to different chemical cues (i.e. treatment).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. A/Cercarial number (mean daily number of cercariae shed per individual snail ± s.e.) and B/cercarial size (mean body surface ± s.e. in mm2) produced by Coitocaecum parvum infected snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) maintained under the four different treatment (control vs fish) and temperature (18 or 22 °C) combinations.

Figure 3

Table 2. Results of Fisher's exact tests for pairwise comparisons of the proportion of A/dead and melanized Coitocaecum parvum metacercariae and B/progenetic parasites among surviving metacercariae in amphipod hosts among treatment–temperature (T°C) combinations

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Relationship between parasite size (body surface in mm2) and egg output (number of eggs produced by each individual at the time of dissection) by progenetic Coitocaecum parvum metacercariae in their amphipod second intermediate host Paracalliope fluviatilis. Cercariae used to experimentally infect the amphipods originated from infected snails maintained under the four treatment (control vs fish)–temperature (18 or 22 °C) combinations detailed above the graph. The line of best fit and coefficient of correlation shown on the figure are for all C. parvum individuals.

Figure 5

Table 3. Number (N), size (mm2) and egg output of Coitocaecum parvum metacercariae recovered during dissection of the experimentally infected amphipods for A/all metacercariae, B/normal and C/progenetic individuals only.