Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:59:03.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compatibility in the Biomphalaria glabrata/Echinostoma caproni model: new candidate genes evidenced by a suppressive subtractive hybridization approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2006

A. BOUCHUT
Affiliation:
Parasitologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5555, CNRS Université de Perpignan Perpignan, France
C. COUSTAU
Affiliation:
U547, INSERM Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France
B. GOURBAL
Affiliation:
Parasitologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5555, CNRS Université de Perpignan Perpignan, France
G. MITTA
Affiliation:
Parasitologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, UMR 5555, CNRS Université de Perpignan Perpignan, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to elucidate mechanisms underlying snail/echinostome compatibility, numerous molecular studies comparing transcripts and proteins of Biomphalaria glabrata susceptible or resistant to Echinostoma caproni were undertaken. These studies focused on plasma and haemocytes of the two strains and revealed that some transcripts and/or proteins were differentially expressed between strains. The aim of the present study was to develop a complementary transcriptomic approach by constructing subtractive libraries. This work revealed some candidate transcripts already identified in previous studies (calcium-binding proteins and glycolytic enzymes) as well as novel candidate transcripts that were differentially represented between strains of B. glabrata. Among these newly identified genes, we revealed several genes potentially involved in immune processes encoding proteases, protease inhibitors, a lectin, an aplysianin-like molecule, and cell adhesion molecules.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Primer sequences used for Q-PCR

Figure 1

Table 2. General characteristics of Biomphalaria glabrata EAF-S and CB-R SSH libraries

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Cluster distribution of the EAF-S and CB-R libraries after BLASTN and BLASTX analysis. ‘Annotated’ clusters are clusters displaying similarities for genes of known function. ‘Unknown’ clusters display similarities for sequences present in the dbEST database of Genbank showing no similarities for genes of known function. The last group ‘No hit’ corresponds to clusters displaying no homology for any sequences present in any non-redundant databases. The percentage represents the number of clusters for each category. The number given in parentheses is the total number of sequences for each category.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Distribution of the annotated clusters from the EAF-S (A) and CB-R (B) libraries into functional classes. The percentages of clusters for each class are given in parentheses.

Figure 4

Table 3. Genes identified from the EAF-S library

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Transcript ratios corresponding to selected clusters of the EAF-S library in whole body susceptible EAF-S snails (light boxes) and resistant CB-R snails (dark boxes). Ratios were determined using real-time quantitative PCR and are expressed relative to S19 expression levels (ratio/S19). Each histogram is the average value (±S.D.) of 3 independent experiments each performed in duplicate. Differential transcription levels between strains are indicated above the histograms. Since transcription levels can differ by up to 2 orders of magnitude, 3 different graphs were used for sake of clarity. *Genes showing differences in transcript levels that were significant (P<0·05) and higher than 2·5-fold.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Transcript ratios corresponding to selected clusters of the CB-R library in whole body susceptible EAF-S snails (light boxes) and resistant CB-R snails (dark boxes). Ratios were determined using real-time quantitative PCR and are expressed relative to S19 expression levels (ratio/S19). Each histogram is the average value (±S.D.) of 3 independent experiments each performed in duplicate. Differential levels of the transcripts between strains are indicated above the histograms. Since transcription levels can differ by up to 2 orders of magnitude, 3 different graphs were used for sake of clarity. *Genes showing differences in transcript levels that were significant (P<0·05) and higher than 2·5-fold.

Figure 7

Table 4. Genes identified from the CB-R library