Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:31:52.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of novel photoluminescent hybrid materials by sequential vapor infiltration into polyethylene terephthalate fibers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2014

Halil I. Akyildiz
Affiliation:
Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA; and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
Michael Lo
Affiliation:
Anasys Instruments, Inc., Santa Barbara, California 93101, USA
Eoghan Dillon
Affiliation:
Anasys Instruments, Inc., Santa Barbara, California 93101, USA
Adam T. Roberts
Affiliation:
Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama 35898, USA
Henry O. Everitt
Affiliation:
Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama 35898, USA; and Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
Jesse S. Jur*
Affiliation:
Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: jsjur@ncsu.edu

Abstract

Fibrous polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was modified by organometallic vapor exposure to form hybrid materials with unique photoluminescent characteristics. Using a sequential vapor infiltration (SVI) process, the elongated exposures of trimethylaluminum (TMA) to PET were examined. As the infiltration temperature increased, the evidence of changes in the reaction between the organometallic vapor and the polymer was observed as well as significant changes in the infiltration depth into the polymer fiber, owing to the variation in the reaction mechanisms of the hybrid material formation. At TMA exposures of 60 °C, the mass of the polymer fiber increased by ∼55 wt%, whereas exposures at 150 °C were limited to ∼25 wt% infiltration. Photoluminescence analysis of PET after TMA infiltration shows an intensity increase of up to ∼13x and an increase in red shift with increasing infiltration temperature, attributed to the variations in the reaction mechanism to form the hybrid modification observed through the spectroscopy analysis.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Mass gain of (a) RFs and (b) WFs as a function of number of TMA cycles at temperatures varying between 60 and 150 °C. TMA cycles were conducted with a sequence of 0.5 s dose/30 s hold/30 s purge and H2O cycles of approximately half number of the TMA cycles were conducted with a sequence of 0.2 s dose/30 s hold/30 s purge.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. SEM micrographs of (a) untreated, (b) 3 cycle, (c) 15 cycle, and (d) 30 cycle SVI treated WFs, (e) untreated, and (f) 30 cycle SVI treated RFs showing the change in the fiber morphology upon SVI treatment. All the treatments are at 60 °C.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. FTIR spectra of SVI treated fabrics made of RFs after (a) 10 TMA cycles and (b) 60 TMA cycles. Samples are treated under similar exposure conditions (TMA cycle: 0.5 s dose/30 s hold/30 s purge and H2O cycle: 0.2 s dose/30 s hold/30 s purge).

Figure 3

FIG. 4. TEM micrograph of cross-section of RFs treated with (a) 90 TMA SVI cycles at 60 °C and (b) 60 TMA SVI cycles at 150 °C.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. X-ray diffraction spectra of the control and samples treated with SVI at 60 and 90 °C.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. AFM-IR spectra and AFM images of cross-sections of RFs treated with (a) high wave number (normalized at 2972 cm−1), (b) low wave number (normalized at 1268 cm−1) 60 TMA SVI cycles at 150 °C, (c) high wave number (normalized at 2968 cm−1), (d) low wave number (normalized at 1268 cm−1) 90 TMA SVI cycles at 90 °C, (e) high wave number (normalized at 2964 cm−1), and (f) low wave number (normalized at 1268 cm−1) 90 TMA SVI cycles at 90 °C after 1 h heat treatment at 150 °C.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Comparison of untreated PET samples and those treated with SVI at 60, 90, and 150 °C (a) under natural lighting and (b) under UV illumination.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Room temperature PL spectra conducted on control fabrics and 90 and 150 °C SVI treated fabrics excited at λex = 355 nm.