Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T11:44:08.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ballooning emplacement and alteration of the Chah-Musa subvolcanic intrusion (NE Iran) inferred from magnetic susceptibility and fabric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2019

Ali Seifivand
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
Maryam Sheibi*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran
*
*Author for correspondence: Maryam Sheibi, Email: sheibi@shahroodut.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The porphyritic diorite Chah-Musa subvolcanic intrusion is located in the Toroud-Chah Shirin magmatic arc in the northern Central Iranian structural zone. The elliptical Chah-Musa body hosts a copper deposit and intrudes an Eocene sequence of volcanic breccia, agglomerate and red tuffaceous sediment. High magnetic susceptibility values are attributed to the presence of magnetite as a magnetic carrier. Changes in bulk magnetic susceptibility correlate with zonation of alteration in the intrusion. Although the degree of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility decreases due to hydrothermal alteration, the field observations confirm that this parameter can be used as a strain marker. Strongly oblate magnetic ellipsoids are found in the eastern half of the intrusion where isolated outcrops of flat-lying tuffaceous host cover dioritic rocks (roof zone). Stations with prolate ellipsoids mostly belong to the centre of the intrusion where the magnetic lineations plunge steeply. They are interpreted as indicating the main feeder zone. The concentric fabric pattern at the periphery of intrusion, the oblate magnetic ellipsoids at the roof, the highest anisotropy degree along the small diameter of the intrusion, and an intense deformation of the host rocks, especially at the western margin, all are evidence that the intrusion was ballooning during the late stages of its emplacement. Ascent and emplacement of the Chah-Musa body is ascribed to the tensional space provided by a dextral shear zone created by the regional left-lateral movement on the bounding Anjilow and Toroud strike-slip faults.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Location of Toroud – Chah Shirin (TCS) magmatic arc in Iran. (b) Schematic structural map of the TCS arc which is bounded by sinistral NE-striking Anjilow and Toroud regional faults (Houshmandzadeh et al. 1978). A star denotes the study area. (c) Simplified geological map of Chah-Musa pluton. Labelled black dots show locations where 73 samples were drilled for AMS study.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Landsat image showing the structural model and location of epithermal ore deposit in the TCS belt. The model includes the NE-striking regional sinistral faults (F1, ~70°), sinistral NNW-striking faults (F2, ~340°) and dextral WNW-striking faults (F3, ~280°). The orientation of σH-max, modelled as the acute bisector of the conjugate pair, is ~340° and the majority of veins are modelled as nearly pure extension fractures (T) oriented roughly parallel to σH-max. The model fits well with the Riedel shear model in which sinistral NE-striking faults and lineaments represent the main shear plane (M), and the NNW structures and WNW structures represent R and R′, respectively (Mehrabi et al. 2015).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Field views of the Eocene volcano-pyroclastic sequence (Ev1) that is the main host rock of the Chah-Musa intrusion. (a) Northwestern contact of the Chah-Musa sub-volcanic intrusion parallel to bedding in the country rocks where red tuff and dacitic lava are inclined. (b) Sharp contact between Eocene dacitic lava (Edc) and red tuff (Et). (c) Closer view of the contact of diorite porphyry (Di) with extremely crushed host rocks (Evb) along the western border. (d) Typical agglomerate (Eag) containing large fragments of red tuff (Et). (e) Volcanic breccia at the top of the host sequence.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) Field view of the Chah-Musa intrusion. Landscape of the summit and low-elevation flat area of Chah-Musa. (b) Hand specimen of fresh porphyritic diorite containing phenocrysts of plagioclase and needles of hornblende set in a fine-grained matrix. (c) Onion skin erosion of the porphyry diorite at the western inner contact. (d) and (e) respectively show some xenoliths with preferred orientation parallel to the innermost margin, and small randomly disseminated xenoliths at the centre of the intrusion.

Figure 4

Table 1. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility data of the Chah-Musa intrusion

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Representative photomicrographs of texture and mineral assemblages of fresh (a, b) and variously altered rocks from the Chah-Musa intrusion. (a) Sieve texture in plagioclase crystals with a clear rim; (b) (a) at plane polarized light (ppl). (c) Diorite containing plagioclase, hornblende with opacified rims, and opaques (#12); (d) (c) at ppl. (e) Diorite with phyllitic alteration in which plagioclase is altered to sericite (#1); (f) (e) at ppl. (g) Diorite with argillic alteration exhibiting complete replacement of plagioclase by kaolinite (#16); (h) (g) at ppl.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Magnetic susceptibility histogram (in SI) for different types of altered samples from Chah-Musa intrusion.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Magnetic susceptibility contour map (in SI) of the Chah-Musa intrusion.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Susceptibility vs temperature determination of three representative hydrothermally altered rocks from the Chah-Musa intrusion. (Km in SI; T in °C.) K(T) curves with susceptibility normalized to room temperature.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Anisotropy percentage contour map of the Chah-Musa intrusion.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Shape factor contour map of the Chah-Musa intrusion. Selected stereoplots of magnetic fabrics developed in the feeder zone at the centre and roof zone at the eastern area showing the mean K1 and K3 orientations. The anisotropy degree vs ellipsoid shape (P–T) plots of the AMS highlighting variable ellipticity of the magnetic fabric.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Magnetic lineation map of the Chah-Musa intrusion. The main magma feeder zone is concentrated in the central area.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Stereoplots representing lineations (K1) and poles to foliation planes (K3).

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Magnetic foliation map of the Chah-Musa intrusion. The dashed lines tend to delineate concentric foliation trajectories.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. (a) Susceptibility (Km in SI) vs anisotropy (P%); (b) susceptibility (Km) vs T shape fabric; (c) anisotropy (P%) vs T shape fabric.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Emplacement model of the Chah-Musa intrusion through a ballooning mechanism at contact with pyroclastic rocks. (a) Regional scale of dextral shear zone providing tensional spaces required for magma ascent and emplacement. (b) Subsequent expansion of magma and pushing aside of the host rocks through ballooning of magma against pyroclastic rocks at the rheological boundary between andesitic agglomerate, volcanic breccia (Eag & Evb) and red tuffs (Et); layering in the host rocks is inclined. (c) Geologic cross-sections of the Chah-Musa intrusion and its country rock. Arrows indicate directions of inflation. Ellipses show shape parameter at the feeder zone and roof of the magma chamber.