Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T14:01:03.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A CPW-fed reconfigurable patch antenna with circular polarization diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2014

Ch. Sulakshana*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, AP, India. Phone: +91 9246933895
L. Anjaneyulu
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, AP, India. Phone: +91 9246933895
*
Corresponding author: Ch. Sulakshana Email: sulakshana@nitw.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a simple and compact coplanar waveguide (CPW)-fed circular-shaped reconfigurable patch antenna with a switchable circular polarization (CP) sense. The circular patch is cut at the ends vertically and switches are introduced to connect the patch ends. By controlling the ON/OFF status of the two switches, the polarization of the antenna can be switched between two states: left-hand circular polarization and right-hand circular polarization. The patch is designed on a very thin RT Duroid substrate of dielectric constant (εr) of 2.2 and thickness of 0.254 mm. The overall antenna dimensions are 35 × 30 mm. The antenna is designed and simulated using finite-element method -based EM simulator, HFSS. For each switching condition the return loss curve, radiation pattern are obtained. Axial ratio curves for polarization diversity cases are also plotted. Parametric studies have been made in order to get optimized values for certain antenna dimensions such as thickness, CPW ground to feed gap, etc.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Structure of the proposed reconfigurable antenna.

Figure 1

Table 1. Different switch configurations for the proposed reconfigurable antenna.

Figure 2

Table 2. Simulation setup parameters.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Surface current distributions of the antenna operating in Mode 3.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Return loss curve for all possible switch configurations.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Radiation patterns in the elevation plane.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. (a) Axial ratio for Mode 2, (b) axial ratio for Mode 3.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Return loss curve for different.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Return loss curve for different values of ‘g’ available thicknesses.

Figure 9

Table 3. Comparison of return loss for different values of CPW ground to feed gap ‘g’.

Figure 10

Table 4. Comparison of return loss for different values of available substrate thicknesses.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Return loss curve for different values of ‘d’ when the antenna is operated in Mode 4.

Figure 12

Table 5. Results.