Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:10:45.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High temperature microcompression and nanoindentation in vacuum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2011

Sandra Korte*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom
Robert J. Stearn
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom
Jeffrey M. Wheeler
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom
William J. Clegg
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: Sandra.Korte@cantab.net

Abstract

In small-scale testing at elevated temperatures, impurities in inert gases can pose problems so that testing in vacuum would be desirable. However, previous experiments have indicated difficulties with thermal stability and instrument noise. To investigate this, measurements of the temperature changes in a modified nanoindenter have been made and their influence on the displacement and load measurements is discussed. It is shown that controlling the temperatures of the indenter tip and the sample enabled flat punch indentations of gold, a good thermal conductor, to be carried out over several minutes at 665 °C in vacuum, as well as permitting thermal stability to be quickly re-established in site-specific microcompression experiments. This allowed compression of nickel superalloy micropillars up to sample temperatures of 630 °C with very low levels of oxidation after 48 h. Furthermore, the measured Young moduli, yield and flow stresses were consistent with literature data.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1.Schematic of NanoTest with heaters and position of thermocouples (green, curly arrows). Thermocouples only used during preliminary tests are marked by dashed lines. The custom-built sapphire indenter shown is assembled using ceramic high temperature adhesive, avoiding lower melting brazes as a potential source of additional compliance at high temperatures.

Figure 1

FIG. 2.Side view of the equipment near the indenter tip and sample showing the position of the heaters and machine components exposed to the highest temperatures.

Figure 2

FIG. 3.(a) Temperatures measured at the tip mount and pivot in vacuum (vac) and air and with or without sample heater (SH) installed and (b) the tip mount temperatures measured during a subsequent hold of 100 min at 700 °C.

Figure 3

FIG. 4.Light emitted from the heaters in vacuum at different temperatures. Similar emission levels observed at the indenter tip and contact surface indicate proximity to thermal equilibrium where both tip and sample heaters are used (d).

Figure 4

FIG. 5.Thermal stability measurements at heater temperatures of 700 °C (after heating over 4 h) showing stabilization of the system within approximately 1.5 h and a final drift rate of 0.05 nm·s−1 over the last 5 min.

Figure 5

FIG. 6.Measurements on gold at 665 °C. The load versus time for these cyclic experiments with different loading times or rates is given in (a). The stability achieved at different loads on unloading and creep at the maximum loads is shown in (b). As expected, where loading was performed at a low rate (0.025 mN/s), creep during loading and unloading is more pronounced (c). All data are “as measured” without any correction for thermal drift.

Figure 6

FIG. 7.Comparison of measured indentation depths with electron micrographs (specimen tilt 52°). (a) Indent corresponding to the load–displacement curve shown in Figure 6(b). Final recorded depth is 2670 nm. (b) Indent after a 600 s hold at 0.05 mN. Final recorded depth is 499 nm. The lower half of the residual indent is indicated for clarity. Both indents were placed at 665 °C.

Figure 7

FIG. 8.(a) Stress–strain curves recorded on CMSX-4 micropillars in vacuum at 22 °C (blue), 300 °C (green), and 630 °C (orange), (b) shows low-strain segments of the curves shown in (a) with the curves recorded at 300 and 630 °C offset for clarity. The additional peak observed in the curve in (a) is due to contact with residual material in the trench surrounding the pillar. The increasing yield stress with temperature is consistent with macroscopic tests22 and the flow stress at several percent strain with hardness measurements at up to 400 °C10 as indicated on the ordinate in (b) using the same color scheme. None of the curve has been corrected for thermal drift and the position of the drift hold segments at 10% maximum load are indicated by arrows in (a).

Figure 8

FIG. 9.Comparison of mechanical data from micropillar and macroscopic experiments10,22,27 showing (a) Young moduli and (b) the yield and 5% flow stresses.

Figure 9

FIG. 10.Micropillars tested between 22 and 630 °C in vacuum showing temperature-dependent changes in the deformation structures and little alteration in surface quality after exposure to elevated temperatures of up to 630 °C for 48 h. (a) At the higher temperature, deformation takes place on several intersecting slip systems, visible in particular in the top view. Some reaction between compression punch and the top surface, particularly at the higher temperature, and local deformation due to roughness of the compression punch is evident from the same micrographs. (b) Higher magnification micrographs of two deformed and one undeformed pillar showing little oxidation or contamination of the pillar surface not in contact with the compression punch and increasing activation of slip on intersecting glide planes toward higher temperatures.