Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T07:09:14.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary results of ionic concentrations in snow pits along the Zhongshan–Dome A traverse route, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Ren Jiawen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Ice Core and Cold Regions Environment, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 260 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou 730000, China E-mail: jwren@ns.lzb.ac.cn
Sun Junying
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Ice Core and Cold Regions Environment, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 260 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou 730000, China E-mail: jwren@ns.lzb.ac.cn
Qin Dahe
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Ice Core and Cold Regions Environment, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 260 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou 730000, China E-mail: jwren@ns.lzb.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During an inland traverse expedition along the route from Zhongshan station on the coast to Dome A (about 4200ma.s.l.; 1400 km from Zhongshan) in East Antarctica in 1998/99, three snow pits with a depth of 2.1–3.3m were sampled continuously. Snow pits were located at sites 800–1100km from the coast, with altitudes varying from 2850 to 3760 m. The samples were analyzed for stable oxygen isotope and major ions. Seasonal variations in δ18O are not clear, so initial dating was made through comparison of concentration profiles of major ions and then adjusted according to the visible stratigraphy. Generally, average ionic concentrations decrease with increasing altitude and hence distance from the coast, but NH4+ and Ca2+ have relatively high values at a site 1000 km inland. Ionic concentrations tend to increase with depth at lower altitudes, but the opposite is true at higher altitudes. Accumulation rates increase with depth at site DT401 (3760ma.s.l.; 1097 km from Zhongshan) and decrease at DT364 (3380ma.s.l.; 1022 km from Zhongshan) and DT263 (2850ma.s.l.; 820 km from Zhongshan), suggesting that differences in regional trends exist. In all snow pits, Na+ and Cl– concentration profiles have a very good positive correlation. Profiles of nssSO4 2– in the pits show quite different features. At 3760ma.s.l, no remarkable nssSO4 2– peaks can be distinguished, but one and three peak sets are quite striking at 3380 and 2850 m, respectively.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2004
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Map showing the Zhongshan–Dome A traverse route and location of sampling sites.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Profiles of Na+, Cl– and δ18O compared with the ice-crust distribution (vertical bars on the upper coordinate axis). Annual layers from 1974 to 1998 are shown as vertical dotted lines in snow pits at DT401, DT364 and DT263, identified as explained in the text.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Variations of the accumulation rate at DT401, DT364 and DT263.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.NO3– concentration profiles in snow pits at DT401, DT364 and DT263. The time markers are derived from Figure 2 as explained in the text.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.nssSO42– concentration profiles in snow pits at DT401, DT364 and DT263. The time markers were derived from Figure 2 as explained in the text. 1984–86, respectively. It is questionable whether these peaks all indicate volcanic eruptions. If the upper and lower peak sets are regarded as signals of Pinatubo (plus Hudson) and possibly El Chichόn (Mexico; 17.3˚N, 93.2˚ W) eruptions, respectively, the 1989 peak does not have a corresponding volcano event. It was estimated that the El Chichόn eruption in 1982 loaded 7±2 Mt of SO4 into the atmosphere (Bluth and others, 1992), smaller than the Pinatubo eruption but larger than the Hudson eruption. However, this eruption has not been detected at DT001 (Zhang and others, 2002), only 500 km from DT263. More data are needed to confirm and further investigate the large differences between the three pit sites and whether the nssSO42– could be taken as an indicator of volcano events in this area.

Figure 5

Table 1.Average values of ionic concentrations in snow pits (μeq L –1)