Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:29:56.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Husserl's Later Philosophy of Natural Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Patrick A. Heelan
Patrick A. Heelan*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Husserl argues in the Crisis that the prevalent tradition of positive science in his time had a philosophical core, called by him “Galilean science”, that mistook the quest for objective theory with the quest for truth. Husserl is here referring to Göttingen science of the Golden Years. For Husserl, theory “grows“ out of the “soil” of the prescientific, that is, pretheoretical, life-world. Scientific truth finally is to be sought not in theory but rather in the pragmatic-perceptual praxes of measurement. Husserl is faulted for taking measuring processes to be “infinitely perfectible“. The dependence of new scientific phenomena on the existence of prior “prescientific” inductive praxis is analyzed, also Husserl's residual objectivism and failure to appreciate the hermeneutic character of measurement. Though not a scientific (theory-)realist, neither was he an instrumentalist, but he was a scientific (phenomena-)realist.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 368 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

I want to acknowledge with gratitude the helpful discussions I have had with Joseph Kockelmans, Robert Sokolowski, Donn Welton, Claude Evans, and many graduate students at SUNY, Stony Brook.

References

Becker, O. (1970), “Contributions towards the Phenomenological Foundation of Geometry and its Physical Applications”, in Kockelmans and Kisiel (1970), pp. 119–146.Google Scholar
Boehm, R. (1964), “Les sciences exactes et l'idèal Husserlien d'un savoir rigoureux”, Archives de Philosophie 27: 424–438.Google Scholar
Carr, D. (1974a), Phenomenology and the Problem of History. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Courant, R. and Hilbert, D. (1924), Methoden der Mathematischen Physik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. (1949), “Autobiographical Notes”, in Schilpp, P. (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. New York: Library of Living Philosophers, pp. 1–96.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. ([1935] 1954), “Physics and Reality”, in Selig, C. (ed.), Ideas and Opinions. Translated and revised by S. Bargmann. New York: Dell, pp. 283–315.Google Scholar
Elliston, F. and McCormick, P. (eds.) (1977), Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, J. (1970), Hilbert: Toward a Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. vol. II. Hauppauge, NY: Paideia.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, A. (1966), “The Last Work of Husserl”, in A. Gurwitsch, Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 397–447.Google Scholar
Gutting, G. (1979), “Husserl and Scientific Realism”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39: 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelan, P. (1965), Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelan, P. (1983a), Space-Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelan, P. (1983b), “Natural Science as a Hermeneutic of Instrumentation”, Philosophy of Science 50: 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelan, P. (1983c), “Perception as a Hermeneutical Act”, Review of Metaphysics 37: 61–75.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1952), Philosophic Problems of Nuclear Science. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1932–1935), David Hilbert Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1938), The Foundations of Geometry. (Original German edition published in 1901.) La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1970), “Axiomatic Thinking”, in Fang (1970), pp. 187–198. Originally published in Mathematische Annalen 78 (1918): 405–415; and republished in Hilbert (1932–1935), III.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, C. (1986), A Realist Theory of Science. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1900/01), Logische Untersuchungen, I und II. (2nd rev. ed., 1913.) Halle: Niemeyer. English translation by J. Findlay (1970), Logical Investigations, 2 vols. London: routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1929), Formale und Transzendentale Logik. Halle: Niemeyer. English translation by D. Cairns (1969), Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1954), Erfahrung und Urteil. Edited by Landgrebe, L. Hamburg: Claasen. English translation by J. Churchill and K. Ameriks (1973), Experience and Judgment. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1950), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Volume I. Edited by Walter Biemel. Husserliana III. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1952a), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Volume II. Edited by Marly Biemel. Husserliana IV. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1952b), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Volume III. Edited by Marly Biemel. Husserliana V. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1954), Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Edited by Walter Biemel. Husserliana VI. The Hague: Nijhoff. English translation by D. Carr (1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970), Philosophie der Arithmetik (und Abhandlungen). Edited by L. Eley. Husserliana XII. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Ihde, D. (1979), Technics and Praxis. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1970a), “Phenomenology as the Science of Science”, in Kockelmans and Kisiel (eds.) (1970), pp. 5–44.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1970b), “Husserl on the History of Science”, in Kockelmans and Kisiel (eds.) (1970), pp. 68–92.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1973), “On the Dimensions of a Phenomenology of Science in Husserl and the Young Dr. Heidegger”, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 4: 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1977), “Heidegger and the New Image of Science”, Research in Phenomenology 7: 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, F. (1932/1939), Elementary Mathematics from an Advanced Standpoint. Translated by E. R. Hedrick and C. A. Noble. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kockelmans, J. (1970), “The Mathematization of Nature in Husserl's Last Publication”, in Kockelmans and Kisiel (eds.) (1970), pp. 45–67.Google Scholar
Kockelmans, J. (1985), Heidegger and Science. Lantham, Maryland: University Press of America and Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology.Google Scholar
Kockelmans, J. and Kisiel, T. (1970), Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Koyré, A. ([1939]1978), Galileo Studies. Translated by J. Mepham. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Ladrière, J. (1970), “Mathematics in a Philosophy of the Sciences”, in Kockelmans and Kisiel (eds.) (1970), pp. 443–465.Google Scholar
Landgrebe, L. (1977), “Phenomenology as Transcendental Theory of History”, in Elliston and McCormick (1977), pp. 101–113.Google Scholar
Landgrebe, L. (1981), The Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl: Six Essays. Edited and with Introduction by Welton, D. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mahnke, D. ([1923] 1977), “From Hilbert to Husserl: First Introduction to Phenomenology, Especially that of Formal Mathematics”, (translated by D. Boyer), Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962), The Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by C. Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968), The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by A. Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. (1969), Edmund Husserl's Theory of Meaning. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. (1974), “Life-World and A Priori in Husserl's Later Thought”, Analecta Husserliana 3: 46–65.Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. (1977), “On Husserl's Theory of Meaning”, in Elliston and McCormick (1977), pp. 18–37.Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. (1982), Husserl and Frege. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Natanson, M. (1964), “The ‘Legenswelt‘”, in Strauss (ed.) (1964), pp. 75–93.Google Scholar
Nicholson, G. (1984), Seeing and Reading. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols.; vols. 1–6 edited by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, vols. 7–8 edited by A. Burks. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1963), Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. (1964), The Formation of Husserl's Concept of Constitution. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. (1974), James and Husserl. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. (1975), “Spatial and Temporal Models in Husserl's Ideas II”, Cultural Hermeneutics 3: 105–116.Google Scholar
Straus, E. (ed.) (1964), Phenomenology: Pure and Applied. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Ströker, E. (ed.) (1979), Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft in der Philosophie Edmund Husserls. Frankfurt am Main: Klosterman.Google Scholar
Welton, D. (1983), The Origins of Meaning: A Critical Study of the Thresholds of Husserlian Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, H. ([1949]1963), Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Wigner, E. (1967), Reflections and Symmetries. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Zucker, F. J. (1982), “Phenomenological Evidence and the ‘Idea’ of Physics”, in Bruzina, R. and Wiltshire, B. (eds.), Phenomenology Dialogues and Bridges. Albany: SUNY Press, pp. 269–290.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Erratum