Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:30:25.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dielectric behavior related to TiOx phase change to TiO2 in TiOx/Al2O3 nanolaminate thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Geunhee Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080; Institute for Functional Nanomaterials, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3343
Ram S. Katiyar
Affiliation:
Institute for Functional Nanomaterials, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3343
Bo-Kuai Lai
Affiliation:
Lake Shore Cryotronics, Westerville, Ohio 43082
Charudatta Phatak
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Orlando Auciello*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080
*
Address all correspondence to Geunhee Lee atgeunhee.lee@utdallas.eduand Orlando Aucielloorlando.auciello@utdallas.edu
Address all correspondence to Geunhee Lee atgeunhee.lee@utdallas.eduand Orlando Aucielloorlando.auciello@utdallas.edu

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that TiOx/Al2O3 nanolaminates (TAO NL) exhibit abnormally high-dielectric constant k (800–1000), due to Maxwell–Wagner polarization, via charge accumulation at insulating Al2O3/semiconducting TiOx interfaces. Here, we report TAO NL dielectric properties related to TiOx phase change in TiOx (0.9 nm)/Al2O3 (0.1 nm) NL. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy shows amorphous TiOx phase change to crystalline anatase TiO2 due to free-energy minimization. The phase change induce reduction in leakage current and dielectric loss (J = 10−2 to 10−4 A/cm2, tan δ = 10 to 10−1), still with k ~ 600 up to MHz, compared to amorphous TAO NLs.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Dielectric constant and loss of: (a) 0.5 nm TiOx–0.5 nm Al2O3 NL, (b) 0.7 nm TiOx–0.3 nm Al2O3 NL, (c) 0.9 nm TiOx–0.1 nm Al2O3 NL, and (d) leakage current density of these three samples.

Figure 1

Figure 2. AFM topographical surface images of: (a) 0.5 nm TiOx–0.5 nm Al2O3 NL, (b) 0.7 nm TiOx–0.3 nm Al2O3 NL, and (c) 0.9 nm TiOx–0.1 nm Al2O3 NL (note that the light dots in this image correspond to the TiO2 phases). (d) Rms surface roughness of the samples described in panels (a), (b), and (c). (e) XRD [showing the TiO2 phase in sample (c)]. (f) Raman spectroscopy spectrum of these three samples [the red curve shows peaks corresponding to the TiO2 phase in sample (c)].

Figure 2

Figure 3. Low-magnification TEM images of: (a) 0.5 nm TiOx–0.5 nm Al2O3 NL, (b) 0.7 nm TiOx–0.3 nm Al2O3 NL, (c) and (d) 0.9 nm TiOx–0.1 nm Al2O3 NL; and HRTEM images of: (e) 0.5 nm TiOx–0.5 nm Al2O3 NL, (f) 0.7 nm TiOx–0.3 nm Al2O3 NL, and (g) 0.9 nm TiOx–0.1 nm Al2O3 NL.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Schematic NL structures of: (a) 0.5 nm TiOx–0.5 nm Al2O3 NL, (b) 0.7 nm TiOx–0.3 nm Al2O3 NL, (c) and (d) 0.9 nm TiOx–0.1 nm Al2O3 NL.