Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T18:29:35.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A pilot study of the body weight of pure-bred client-owned adult cats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2011

Ellen Kienzle and
Katja Moik
Ellen Kienzle*
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Dietetics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schönleutner Strasse 8, 85764Oberschleißheim, Germany
Katja Moik
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Dietetics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schönleutner Strasse 8, 85764Oberschleißheim, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Professor E. Kienzle, fax +49 89 2180 78702, email kienzle@tiph.vetmed.uni-muenchen.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A total of 539 pure-bred and seventy-five cats without a pedigree were weighed and scored at cat shows or in veterinary surgeries. Data from normal-weight cats with a body condition score (BCS) of 5 (ideal) were only used. Breeds were grouped into five classes. For female cats, the mean weight for these groups were as follows: very light (2·8 kg); light (3·2 kg); medium (3·5 kg); large (4·0 kg); giant (4·9) kg. For male cats, the corresponding values were 3·6, 4·2, 4·3, 5·1 and 6·1 kg. Siamese/Oriental Shorthair were identified as a very light breed, the Norwegian Forest and the Siberian Cat as a large breed and the Maine Coon as a giant breed. Males and females of the same breed did not always belong to the same class. In some breeds, individuals of the same sex were found in two different classes. The percentage of intact overweight cats (BCS >5) was low (7 % of intact males, 3 % of intact females). Incidence of overweight in neutered cats was 50 % in males and 38 % in females. Among pedigreed cats, there were differences in the incidence of overweight in neutered cats: high in Norwegian Forest Cats (males 75 %, females 50 %) and low in Siamese/Oriental Shorthair Cats (males 25 %, females 1 %). Cats with a BCS of 6, 7 and 8 had on average 120, 154 and 214 % of the normal weight of their breed, respectively.

Keywords

Body weightOverweightPure-bred cats

Information

Type
Full Papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 106 , Issue S1 , 12 October 2011, pp. S113 - S115
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

With regard to the incidence of overweight in pet cats, which has by now reached nearly 50 %(Reference Russel, Sabin and Holt1), prevention of overfeeding is highly important. In addition, although weight loss may reduce energy expenditure in cats, maintaining an ideal weight after weight loss is very difficult(Reference Villaverde, Ramsey and Green2). For instance, 1 kg of overweight in a cat may already represent a potential health risk. Therefore, it is very important to have detailed data on the normal weight of cats in order to alert veterinarians and cat owners to the onset and early stages of overweight. Data on the body weight of cats are mostly the data on domestic European Shorthair-type cats without a pedigree. When present, this information is usually included in the Materials and method section of research papers on cats. Often, there is no information on the body condition of the cats. The reader can only guess whether the cats were lean or not. The use of lean cats can be presumed in studies where intact young adult animals are used, in studies with intact cats in a breeding colony(Reference Strasser3) or in a breeding experiment(Reference Loveridge, Rivers, Burger and Rivers4, Reference Hendriks and Wamberg5). Leanness of experimental cats is also likely in studies where chemical analyses(Reference Stratmann6, Reference Hendriks, Moughan and Tarttelin7) or dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry analysis was carried out and the cats show a reasonable fat content(Reference Lauten, Cox and Baker8). Data on cats of other breeds than domestic non-pedigreed European Shorthair cats are scarce. In the present study, more data on the relationship between breed, sex, body condition scores (BCS) and body weight in cats were collected.

Materials and methods

A total of 539 pure-bred and seventy-five adult cats without a pedigree were weighed and scored (BCS by Laflamme(Reference Laflamme9)) at cat shows (pure-bred cats, South of Germany and Elsass in France breeders came also from different areas) or in veterinary surgeries (mostly cats without a pedigree, small-town, small-animal practices, without high specialisation) in the South of Germany in a prospective study. Cats were considered to be adult at ≥ 1 year: 192 were intact males, 247 intact females, 109 neutered males and sixty-six neutered females. With the exception of two Norwegian Forest cats (mother and daughter), there were no direct relatives. The same mobile baby scale was used for all cats, and all cats were scored by the same person. Data from cats with a BCS other than 5 were not used for statistics on normal body weight. Means and standard deviations were calculated. A one-way ANOVA with breed as the classifying factor (only breeds with n>6), where breeds were sorted into homogeneous classes, was carried out using WinSTAT 2007.1 (WinSTATR, Fitch Software, Bad Krozingen, Germany). Breed differences in the incidence of overweight were compared by the χ2 test (P < 0·05). In addition, in forty cats, feline BMI according to Hawthorne & Butterwick(Reference Hawthorne and Butterwick10) was applied as a control of BCS assessment, which agreed very well with short-haired cats (18–24 % body fat, according to feline BMI, in fifteen cats with a BCS of 5).

Results

The mean weight of lean cats (BCS 5) is given in Table 1. There were no significant differences between lean intact and neutered cats, except for male Maine Coons, where the intact males had an average weight of 6·3 (sd 1·1) kg (n 23) and the neutered males had 4·9 (sd 0·8) kg (n 5; P < 0·005). Within the males and females, five classes were identified, respectively. For female cats, the mean weights in these groups were as follows: very light (2·8 kg); light (3·2 kg); medium (3·5 kg); large (4·0 kg); giant (4·9 kg). For male cats, the corresponding values were 3·6, 4·2, 4·3, 5·1 and 6·1 kg. Males and females of the same breed did not always belong to the same class. In some breeds, individuals of the same sex were found in two different classes. The European Shorthair Cats of both sexes without a pedigree were classified as either light or medium.

Table 1Body weight (BW) of male and female cats* in ideal body condition scores (5) of different breeds

(Mean values, standard deviations and number of cats)

* Both intact and neutered cats in ideal body condition.

† Pedigreed, unless otherwise indicated.

‡ Only classified if more than six individuals.

The percentage of intact overweight cats (i.e. BCS >5) was very low, it amounted to 7 % of all intact males and 3 % of all intact females (total number of intact males 192 and of intact females 247). By contrast, the incidence of overweight in neutered cats was 45 %. It amounted to 50 % in neutered males (n 109), and to 38 % in females (n 66). Among pedigreed cats, there were significant differences in the incidence of overweight (BCS>5): Norwegian Forest Cats from cat shows had an incidence of overweight of 75 % in neutered males and 50 % in neutered females compared with 25 and 1 % in Siamese/Oriental Shorthair Cats shown at cat shows. In pet cats without a pedigree, 51 % of neutered males and 26 % of neutered females were overweight. Cats with a BCS of 6, 7 and 8 had on average 120 % (n 71), 154 % (n 23) and 214 % (n 6) of the normal weight of their breed.

Discussion

Cats were weighed according to their availability in cat shows and in a small-animal practice. Obviously, this leads to an irregular number of cats weighed from different breeds and sexes. In principle, the population of cats from cat shows appears to be similar between breeds with regard to age (68–91 % of cats between 1 and 5 years of age) and a lower percentage of neutered cats (26 %). By contrast, cats without a pedigree showed a similar age distribution as described for cats in small-animal clinics(Reference Kraft11, Reference Davies12) with only about 40 % of the animals between 1 and 5 years of age. The percentage of neutered cats was 85 %. These differences between populations are unlikely to affect the body weight of cats grouped according to the BCS. However, the difference in age distribution probably affects the incidence of overweight and leanness, respectively. Overweight peaks in cat populations at the age of 4–6 or 7 years of age(Reference Russel, Sabin and Holt1, Reference Scarlett, Donoghue and Saidla13). Therefore, differences in the incidence of overweight between the cats from cat shows and pet cats from a veterinary practice cannot be compared directly. If, however, the incidence of overweight is even higher in the younger cats from cat shows than in the more middle-aged group from veterinary practice, this can be interpreted as an even stronger suggestion of a difference in susceptibility to overweight. Thus, the high incidence of overweight in neutered Norwegian Forest Cats in comparison with cats without a pedigree but also in comparison with Siamese and Oriental Shorthair cats is remarkable. The differences are sufficiently large to suggest a breed disposition to overweight and leanness. It is, however, important to point out the role of the owners’ aesthetic perception, which may affect their feeding behaviour, and thus eventually the incidence of overweight. Leanness may be more desirable in a very light elegant breed, and overweight more acceptable to the owners in a breed which is perceived as a big cat. Neutering had no effect on the body weight of lean cats, except in male Maine Coons, where intact males were heavier than neutered ones. It appears likely that this is an effect of selection for size, i.e. larger males are kept for breeding and smaller ones are neutered.

Cats with an average overweight of 214 % were scored as BCS 8. The explanation is probably that (1) the study was focused on finding and weighing pure-bred cats in ideal body condition and (2) scoring was done together with the owner. It is quite possible that the reason why the fattest cats were scored 8 and not 9 is just psychological and subjective, i.e. this being more polite to the owners. It is remarkable that this happened in a scientific study, just a little outside the main purpose of the study.

In all breeds, there was a marked sexual dimorphism with heavier males than females. Even though this was more marked in some breeds than others, the difference is too big to allow a calculation of the mean of a group of cats regardless of their sex. Therefore, scientific papers, especially on weight-loss experiments, should give the mean of the male and female cats separately. It is also not feasible to work with the average of 4 kg in a clinical setting or on nutrition guidelines, because it will overestimate a large percentage of the female feline population (given that a majority of the population has no pedigree). A female cat of 4 kg body weight from a very light, light or medium breed is likely to be between 11 and 43 % overweight. Therefore, at least for the standard non-pedigreed European Shorthair cats, a different ideal weight or ideal weight range for females and males should be used.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all cat owners who cooperated in the study. There is no conflict of interest. In present study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. K. M. obtained the data and statistically evaluated the data. E. K., in part, statistically evaluated the data and wrote the manuscript.

References

1Russel, K, Sabin, R, Holt, S, et al. (2000) Influence of feeding regimen on body condition in the cat. J Small Anim Pract 41, 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Villaverde, C, Ramsey, JJ, Green, AS, et al. (2008) Energy restriction results in a mass-adjusted decrease in energy expenditure in cats that is maintained after weight regain. J Nutr 138, 856–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Strasser, H (1968) Über Aufbau und Fortführung einer Katzenzucht (Establishment and maintenance of a cat colony). Zeitschrift für Versuchstierkunde 10, 137–146.Google Scholar
4Loveridge, GG & Rivers, JPW (1989) Body weight changes and energy intakes of cats during pregnancy and lactation. In Nutrition of the Dog and Cat, [Burger, IH and Rivers, JPW, editors]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
5Hendriks, WH & Wamberg, S (2000) Milk intake of suckling kittens remains relatively constant from one to four weeks of age. J Nutr 130, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Stratmann, B (1988) Untersuchungen zur Körperzusammensetzung von Katzen (Investigations on body composition of cats). Doctoral Thesis, Hannover: Tierärztliche Hochschule..Google Scholar
7Hendriks, WH, Moughan, PJ & Tarttelin, MF (1997) Body composition of the adult domestic cat (Felis catus). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 77, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Lauten, SD, Cox, NR, Baker, GH, et al. (2000) Body composition of growing and adult cats as measured by use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Comp Med 5, 175–183.Google Scholar
9Laflamme, DP (1997) Development and validation of a body condition score system for cats: a clinical tool. Feline Pract 25, 13–18.Google Scholar
10Hawthorne, A & Butterwick, RB (2000) Predicting the body composition of cats: development of a zoometric measurement for estimation of percentage body fat in cats. J Vet Intern Med 14, 365.Google Scholar
11Kraft, W (2003) Geriatrie bei Hund und Katze (Geriatrics in the Dog and Cat), 2nd ed.Stuttgart: Parey Verlag.Google Scholar
12Davies, M (1996) Canine and Feline Geriatrics. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
13Scarlett, M, Donoghue, S, Saidla, J, et al. (1994) Overweight cats: prevalence and risk factors. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 18, 22–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1Body weight (BW) of male and female cats* in ideal body condition scores (5) of different breeds(Mean values, standard deviations and number of cats)