Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T04:48:12.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular characteristics and induction profiles of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and other basic helix–loop–helix and Per–Arnt–Sim domain-containing proteins identified in a carcinogenic liver fluke Clonorchis sinensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Seon-Hee Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Gachon University College of Medicine, 191 Hambakmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
Gyu-Seok Oh
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Gachon University College of Medicine, 191 Hambakmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
Woon-Mok Sohn
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju 52727, Republic of Korea
Kihyun Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Systems Biotechnology, Center for Antibiotic Resistome, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Republic of Korea
Hyun-Jong Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
Young-An Bae*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Gachon University College of Medicine, 191 Hambakmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
*
Author for correspondence: Young-An Bae, E-mail: yabae03@gmail.com

Abstract

Clonorchis sinensis (C. sinensis), a trematode parasite that invades the hypoxic hepatobiliary tract of vertebrate hosts requires a considerable amount of oxygen for its sexual reproduction and energy metabolism. However, little is known regarding the molecular mechanism of C. sinensis involved in the adaptation to the hypoxic environments. In this study, we investigated the molecular structures and induction patterns of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and other basic helix–loop–helix and Per–Arnt–Sim (bHLH–PAS) domain-containing proteins such as HIF-1β, single-minded protein and aryl hydrocarbon receptor, which might prompt adaptive response to hypoxia, in C. sinensis. These proteins possessed various bHLH–PAS family-specific domains. Expression of C. sinensis HIF-1α (CsHIF-1α) was highly induced in worms which were either exposed to a hypoxic condition or co-incubated with human cholangiocytes. In addition to oxygen, nitric oxide and nitrite affected the CsHIF-1α expression depending on the surrounding oxygen concentration. Treatment using a prolyl hydroxylase-domain protein inhibitor under 20%-oxygen condition resulted in an increase in the CsHIF-1α level. Conversely, the other bHLH–PAS genes were less responsive to these exogenous stimuli. We suggest that nitrite and nitric oxide, as well as oxygen, coordinately involve in the regulation of HIF-1α expression to adapt to the hypoxic host environments in C. sinensis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic analysis of bHLH–PAS proteins identified in platyhelminths, including C. sinensis (labelled in bold letters) and human. The un-rooted neighbour-joining tree was constructed using the concatenated alignment of their amino acid sequences corresponding to the bHLH, PAS and PAS-associated C-terminal domains. In addition to the scientific names of respective donor organisms, the identities of examined proteins are distinguished by their GenBank accession numbers. Numerals at branching nodes indicate their percentages of occurrence in 1000 bootstrap replicates. Branching node that connects the members of each bHLH–PAS subfamily is marked using the subfamily name. AHR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ARNT, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator; CLOCK, circadian locomotor output cycles kaput; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; NCOA/SRC, nuclear receptor coactivator/steroid receptor coactivator; NPAS4, neuronal PAS domain protein 4; SIM, single-minded; Trh, trachealess.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Structural characterization of C. sinensis bHLH–PAS proteins and genes. (A) The functional domains of the C. sinensis proteins were predicted using the SMART program. Locations of these domains in the respective proteins are marked with the positions of the initial and terminal amino acids. The domain legend is shown in the right panel. The architectures of human HIF-1α (HsHIF-1α) and SIM (HsSIM) were included for comparison. bHLH, basic helix-loop-helix; PAS, per-arnt-sim; PAC, PAS-associated C-terminal; EFh, EF-hand, calcium binding motif; ODD, oxygen dependent degradation; CTAD, C-terminal transactivation domain. (B) The exon–intron organizations of the C. sinensis bHLH–PAS genes were determined by comparing the genomic and transcribed sequences of the respective genes. The CDSs are presented with grey squares in proportion to their relative sizes and the intervening introns are indicated by solid lines with a fixed length. The phase of each intron, as well as the length of exons and introns in base pairs, are indicated in parentheses. The dotted lines define gene segments that are shared by these C. sinensis genes. The positions of codons in the functional protein domains shown in panel A are marked in the corresponding CDS regions.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Tertiary structures of the C. sinensis HIF-1α and SIM proteins. (A) The three-dimensional structures of CsHIF-1α and CsSIM were simulated using I-TASSER and the ribbon models were represented using PyMol. Red, α-helix; yellow, β-strand. (B) Ramachandran plots were generated to evaluate the stereochemical quality of the predicted CsHIF-1α and CsSIM tertiary structures. The most favoured regions (A, B and L) are in red, while additional allowed (a, b, l and p), generously allowed (−a, −b, −l and −p) and disallowed regions are in brown, yellow and pale yellow fields, respectively. Blue squares and triangles represent non-glycine and glycine residues in the most favoured and additional allowed regions, respectively. Red squares mark non-glycine residues in generously allowed and disallowed regions. (C) Amino acids constituting the DNA-binding pocket of CsHIF-1α were predicted using the I-TASSER program.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Effect of hypoxic stimulus on the expression of the C. sinensis bHLH–PAS genes. (A) The transcription levels of the bHLH–PAS genes were determined by performing qPCR (n = 3, mean ± s.d.) in worms incubated for 2, 4, 8 and 24 h under the 1, 5 and 20%-oxygen conditions. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n.s., not significant. (B) Proteins were extracted from the whole worm bodies of 24 h-incubation groups and examined with CsHIF-1α-specific antibody in Western-blot analysis. The anti-CsCysProt antibody was employed as an internal control to validate equal loading of the protein samples.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Stabilization of the C. sinensis CsHIF-1α protein using DMOG. (A) The expression levels of CsHIF-1α and other bHLH–PAS genes were determined by performing qPCR (n = 3, mean ± s.d.) in worms treated with 0.0, 0.2 and 1 mm DMOG for 2, 4 and 8 h under the 20%-oxygen condition. Worms incubated under the 1%-oxygen condition were used as controls. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n.s., not significant. (B) Proteins were extracted from the whole worm bodies of 8 h-incubation groups and assessed using the CsHIF-1α-specific antibody by performing Western-blot analysis. The anti-CsCysProt antibody was employed as an internal control to validate equal loading of the protein samples.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Effect of nitrite and NO on the expression of the C. sinensis bHLH–PAS genes. (A) Adult worms were incubated for 24 h in medium supplemented with various concentrations of nitrite (indicated in the graph legend), under the 1, 5 and 20%-oxygen conditions. The amounts of the CsHIF-1α and other bHLH–PAS gene transcripts were determined by performing qPCR (n = 3, mean ± s.d.). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n.s., not significant. (B) Similar experiments were conducted on the worms incubated for 24 h in a medium containing 50 µm NOR-4 (NO donor).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Effect of cholangiocytes on the expression of the C. sinensis bHLH–PAS genes. (A) The amounts of the CsHIF-1α and other bHLH–PAS gene transcripts were determined by performing qPCR (n = 3, mean ± s.d.) in worms co-incubated with H69 cells for 24 h under the 1 and 20%-oxygen conditions. Experiments using a medium containing 10 µm nitrite were also conducted during the co-incubations. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n.s., not significant. (B) Proteins extracted from the whole worm bodies of each experimental group were allowed to react with the CsHIF-1α-specific antibody in the Western-blot analysis. The anti-CsCysProt antibody was employed as an internal control to validate equal loading of the protein samples.

Supplementary material: File

Kim et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2 and Figures S1-S2

Download Kim et al. supplementary material(File)
File 663.2 KB