Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:08:41.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Suspected meteorite fragments in marine sediments from East Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

Naresh C. Pant
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Studies, Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi-11007, India
Francisco J. Jimenez-Espejo*
Affiliation:
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Cary P. Cook
Affiliation:
The Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Paromita Biswas
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Studies, Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi-11007, India
Robert Mckay
Affiliation:
Antarctic Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
Claudio Marchesi
Affiliation:
Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, UGR, 18002 Granada, Spain Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, CSIC-UGR, 18100 Armilla, Granada, Spain
Motoo Ito
Affiliation:
Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, JAMSTEC, Kochi 783-8502, Japan
Dewashish Upadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302 Kharagpur, India
Junichiro Kuroda
Affiliation:
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Kenji Shimizu
Affiliation:
Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, JAMSTEC, Kochi 783-8502, Japan
Ryoko Senda
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University, 744, Motooka Nishi-ku Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan
Tina Van De Flierdt
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Yoshinori Takano
Affiliation:
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Katsuhiko Suzuki
Affiliation:
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Carlota Escutia
Affiliation:
Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, CSIC-UGR, 18100 Armilla, Granada, Spain
Prakash K. Shrivastava
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of India, Faridabad, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unusual mafic rock fragments deposited in Plio-Pleistocene-aged marine sediments were recorded at Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Site U1359, in Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. These fragments were identified from sediment layers deposited between c. 3 and 1.2 Ma, indicating a sustained supply during this time interval. Clinopyroxenes in these basalts are Al–Ti diopside–hedenbergite, uncommon in terrestrial magmatic rocks. A single strong peak in the Raman spectra of a phosphate-bearing mineral at 963 cm-1 supports the presence of merrillite. Although not conclusive, petrological traits and oxygen isotopic compositions also suggest that the fragments may be extra-terrestrial fragments affected by shock metamorphism. Nevertheless, it is concluded that the basaltic fragments incorporated in marine sediments at Site U1359 represent ice-rafted material supplied to the continental rise of East Antarctica, probably from the bedrocks near the proximal Ninnis Glacier. Further studies on Plio-Pleistocene sediments near Site U1359 are required to characterize the unusual mafic rocks described.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Geological map of East Antarctica and Marie Byrd Land, modified from Goodge & Fanning (2010). The figure shows the outcrops of known bedrock terranes and inferred subglacial geology. The base map is from BEDMAP-2, with grey areas below sea level (Fretwell et al. 2013), modified using ARCGIS software. Four different provenance sectors, delimited by dashed bold lines, could supply IRD to the studied sediments: a. Terre Adélie, b. George V Land and the Wilkes Subglacial Basin, c. Ross Sea, and d. West Antarctica. Arrows offshore show the direction of iceberg-transport in a counter-clockwise direction. NG: Ninnis Glacier Tongue, MG: Mertz Glacier Tongue, MSZ: Mertz Shear Zone.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Bathymetric map of the Adélie Coast continental margin, showing the topography of the shelf, slope and rise, the main canyons crossing the area, and the location of IODP Site U1359.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Composite lithology, natural gamma radiation (NGR), polarity, geomagnetic polarity time scale (GPTS) and age plot for IODP Site U1359. Diatom rich mud is represented by green shading with chevrons, and terrigenous clays by brown shading with dashed lines. The presence of basaltic fragments is indicated by red vertical bars. Note the presence of basaltic fragments on both sides of the sedimentary hiatus.

Figure 3

Table I Stratigraphic information of sediments studied at IODP site U1359.

Figure 4

Table II Major element analyses of plagioclase and glass in basaltic fragment F2 (Sample IV) from IODP site U1359.

Figure 5

Table III Major element analyses of clinopyroxene in basaltic fragments chondrite normalized (normalizing values from Sun & McDonough 1989).

Figure 6

Table IV Major element analyses of titaniferous magnetite, ilmenite and merrillite in basaltic fragment F3 (Sample VII) from IODP site U1359.

Figure 7

Table V Trace element analyses of clinopyroxene in meteorite fragment F2 (M4 Py and M5 Py) and NIST 610 standard Pearce et al. 1997), compared to clinopyroxene compositions in different angrites.

Figure 8

Table VI Oxygen isotopic analyses of meteorite fragment F4 (Sample VIII) from IODP site U1359.

Figure 9

Fig. 4 a. Back-scattered electron (BSE) image of basaltic fragment F3 from Site U1359. Note euhedral to subhedral laths of plagioclase (Pl) of variable size, glass (Gl) in the matrix (spotted), and subhedral clinopyroxene (Cpx). Plagioclase and clinopyroxene appear unzoned in the BSE image. b. BSE image of basaltic fragment from Site U1359. Note inclusion of a merrillite grain (My) in magnetite (Ma).

Figure 10

Fig. 5 Major element composition of clinopyroxene in basaltic fragments F2, F3 and F4 from Site U1359 plotted (red squares) in the pyroxene classification diagram (En: enstatite, Fs: ferrosilite, Di: diopside, Hd: hedenbergite). Al–Ti diopside–hedenbergite compositions from plutonic and volcanic angrites (Keil 2012) and terrestrial clinopyroxenes from Ferrar volcanic rocks (Elliot et al. 1995) are shown for comparison. High Ca-clinopyroxenes from the McMurdo Volcanic Group (blue circles, data from Nardini et al. 2003) are also shown.

Figure 11

Fig. 6 Plots of a. Fe2+vs Mn and b. Mn/Fe2+vs Ti (in a.p.f.u.), for high Al–Ti diopside–hedenbergite from basaltic fragments F2, F3 and F4 from Site U1359. The regression lines in a for various clinopyroxene sources, as well as comparative data in b, are after Papike (1998).

Figure 12

Fig. 7 Rare earth element concentrations in high Al–Ti diopside–hedenbergite from basaltic fragment F2 from Site U1359 (M4 Py and M5 Py) compared to clinopyroxene compositions in various angrites.

Figure 13

Fig. 8 Oxygen three-isotope plot of basaltic fragments analysed in this study (small circles) and representative compositions of major primary components of solar system materials (CAIs from carbonaceous chondrites, bulk Earth, Mars, ordinary chondrites, achondrites and the Sun) (Clayton 2003). HED stands for howardite–eucrite–diogenite meteorites. Representative1σ mean error bars are shown.

Figure 14

Fig. 9 Raman spectra of the sample from this study compared with spectra from the RRUFF database (http://rruff.info).