Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:23:47.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapid method for cholesterol analysis in bovine milk and options for applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Enrique Viturro*
Affiliation:
Physiology Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, Germany
Heinrich H Meyer
Affiliation:
Physiology Weihenstephan, Technical University Munich, Germany
Carsten Gissel
Affiliation:
Gissel-Institut, Laboratory for Bacteriology and Food Hygiene, Hannover, Germany
Martin Kaske
Affiliation:
Clinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: viturro@wzw.tum.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The adaptation of a colorimetric technique for the analysis of cholesterol in raw milk is presented. Performance quality was satisfying (mean intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) 4·8, inter-assay CV 9·1%, linearity between 0 and 7 mm, recovery of spiked cholesterol into raw milk 98·1 and 106·3%). However, the milk fat extraction must be carried out within the 48 hours following milk sampling. When performing sampling, the significant variation of milk cholesterol composition during the milking process has to be taken into account.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Example of a cholesterol concentration standard curve (y=0·1758 x+0·0413; R2=0·998), arrows show typical cholesterol concentration ranges reported in bovine milk and blood.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sample stability. Five milk samples, stored at 4°C and three milk fat extracts, prepared within 48 h of milking, were separated into aliquots and measured during a period of 7 and 56 days respectively

Figure 2

Table 2. Methodology validation. Three different milk samples were each extracted five times and cholesterol (mm) was measured by colorimetric technique and gas chromatography in parallel

Figure 3

Table 3. Composition differences between the four different milking fractions (n=5)Values are mean±standard deviation. The CV is depicted in brackets.

Figure 4

Table 4. Variation of the milk parameters of 5 individual animals during a period of five days (n=5)Values are mean±standard deviation. The CV is depicted in brackets.