Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:15:23.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods of preservation and flotation for the detection of nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts in faeces of the forest musk deer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2015

X.L. Hu,
G. Liu,
W.X. Wang,
R. Zhou,
S.Q. Liu,
L.H. Li and
D.F. Hu
X.L. Hu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
G. Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Wetland Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China
W.X. Wang
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
R. Zhou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
S.Q. Liu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
L.H. Li*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, ChinaState Forestry Planning and Design Institute of Forest Products Industry, State Forestry Administration, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100013, China
D.F. Hu*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Non-invasive Research Technology for Endangered Species, College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35 Tsinghua East Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China
*
*E-mail: hudf@bjfu.edu.cn and lilinhai1977@sina.com
*E-mail: hudf@bjfu.edu.cn and lilinhai1977@sina.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parasitic infections influence the health of captive forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) and affect population increases. Nevertheless, there are few quantitative studies regarding forest musk deer parasites, and there is no common preservation method or flotation solution used for detection of faecal parasites because of the biology of the worms and the host physiological state. The objective of this study was to evaluate preservation and flotation methods for the detection of nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts in faeces of the forest musk deer. The McMaster technique was used to count nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts in 33 samples of faeces. For the nematode eggs, the differences among flotation solutions were significant (P< 0.01), with sodium nitrate being the best flotation solution, and the combination of freezing and sodium nitrate resulted in the greatest number of eggs per gram (EPG = 209.4 ± 67.8). For the coccidian oocysts, the interaction between preservation method and flotation solution was significant (P< 0.01), and the combination of formalin and sodium chloride yielded the greatest number of oocysts per gram (OPG = 1010.7 ± 162.3). The forest musk deer had a high prevalence of parasitic infections, with the parasite load of coccidia (96.4%) significantly greater than that of nematodes (71.9%, P< 0.01). These results confirm that captive forest musk deer suffer from serious parasitic invasions and demonstrate that the novel method described here could be utilized for parasitological diagnosis, detection and prevention in species of Moschidae and Cervidae.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , November 2016, pp. 680 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Introduction

Parasitic infections pose major threats to the productivity, health and welfare of ruminants, and cervine parasitic infections are no exception. Forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) are valued for the musk secreted by adult males. Musk deer breeding programmes, which began in the 1950s, are not only an important ex-situ protection strategy, but also aim to provide sustainable musk resources. However, population growth of the captive musk deer remains slow, due partly to parasitic infections and associated diseases (Ying, Reference Ying1992; Sha et al., Reference Sha, Yang and Cai1998; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Sha, Cai and Cheng2001; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Cheng and Dai2002; Lu et al., Reference Lu, Qiao, Wu and Su2009). Limited data from earlier studies suggested that the principal parasite species in forest musk deer are coccidia, nematodes, cestodes and trematodes (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Jiang, Yu, Ma and Wang1983; Zhu, Reference Zhu1991; Sha et al., Reference Sha, Zhang, Cai and Wang1994, Reference Sha, Zhang, Cai, Wang and Liu1995), but details are not known concerning the quantification of these parasites.

Several copromicroscopic techniques for evaluating parasite loads have been developed, including smear microscopy, the McMaster method (Gordon & Whitlock, Reference Gordon and Whitlock1939) and FLOTAC (Cringoli, Reference Cringoli2006). Among them, the McMaster method is the most widely used and is the standard quantitative technique in veterinary parasitology, due to its low cost and high sensitivity (Pereckienė et al., Reference Pereckienė, Kaziūnaitė, Vyšniauskas, Petkevičius, Malakauskas, Šarkūnas and Taylor2007). However, many modifications to the McMaster method have been introduced to further increase the diagnostic accuracy and reliability (Wetzel, Reference Wetzel1951; Zajicek, Reference Zajicek1978; Roepstorff & Nansen, Reference Roepstorff and Nansen1998; Cringoli et al., Reference Cringoli, Rinaldi, Veneziano, Capelli and Scala2004). Although the factors influencing the performance of the McMaster method have been studied, such as the faecal preservation method (Foreyt, Reference Foreyt1986; Nielsen et al., Reference Nielsen, Vidyashankar, Andersen, DeLisi, Pilegaard and Kaplan2010; Jagla et al., Reference Jagła, Śpiewak, Zaleśny and Popiołek2013) and the flotation solution used (Cringoli et al., Reference Cringoli, Rinaldi, Veneziano, Capelli and Scala2004), there is no common faecal preservation method or flotation solution for parasite copromicroscopic detection, because of the biology of the worms and the host physiological state (Foreyt, Reference Foreyt2001; Bowman, Reference Bowman2014). Selection of the appropriate faecal preservation method and flotation solution is a prerequisite for effective clinical diagnosis of parasites by breeders and veterinarians (Ward et al., Reference Ward, Lyndal-Murphy and Baldock1997; Roepstorff & Nansen, Reference Roepstorff and Nansen1998; Cringoli et al., Reference Cringoli, Rinaldi, Maurelli and Utzinger2010).

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the methods of preservation and flotation for the detection of nematode eggs and coccidian oocysts in faeces of the forest musk deer, and to identify the best preservation method and flotation solution for forest musk deer. The findings reported herein will facilitate clinical diagnosis of parasites in forest musk deer by breeders and veterinarians.

Materials and methods

Collection and examination of faecal samples

The study was conducted at the Breeding Center of Forest Musk Deer located in Fengxian, Shaanxi Province, in the Qing Ling Mountain region (34°11′N, 106°50′E). This location has a warm temperate climate with an average annual temperature and average rainfall of 11.3°C and 634.6 mm, respectively. All musk deer were fed fresh leaves twice a day, at dawn and dusk, in summer and autumn, and dried leaves in winter and spring, which were collected from the natural habitat of wild musk deer. The plants included Anacardiaceae rhus, Picrasma chinensis, Ulmus pumila and Morus alba, among others. Supplementary artificial food consisted mainly of corn flour, soybean flour, wheat bran, some seasonal vegetables and fruit. Water was provided ad libitum. As the musk deer were allowed to live together during the day and kept individually at night, the faeces could be collected individually after the night.

In July 2013, fresh faecal samples were collected from 33 forest musk deer. Every evening from 19.00 to 20.00 hours, the breeders cleaned the faeces from each individual house to allow collection of fresh faeces from each animal the next morning. Individual forest musk deer were identified by ear tags. Each faecal sample was divided into three parts, and preserved using either freezing at − 20°C, preservation in 10% formalin or in 70% alcohol. The frozen samples were transported to our laboratory using a mobile refrigerator.

Three flotation solutions were used for copromicroscopic analysis of each preserved faecal sample. For each combination of preservation technique and flotation solution, the copromicroscopic analysis procedure was kept constant. The three flotation solutions were all saturated and included sodium chloride and sodium nitrate, both with specific gravities of 1.200, and magnesium sulphate with a specific gravity 1.280. Copromicroscopic analysis of all samples was performed within 2 weeks of sample collection.

The McMaster method was used to count parasite eggs or oocysts in each faecal sample. Up to 2 g of faeces were thoroughly ground up, mixed with 58 ml of tap water and stirred continuously for 20 min until the faecal sample was thoroughly homogenized. Each mixture was filtered into a new beaker through a standard sieve with 0.18-mm mesh, and each resulting filtrate was injected into two counting chambers of a McMaster Egg Slide Counting Chamber (Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences). Microscopy was performed after the eggs were allowed to float for 5 min. The eggs per gram (EPG) or oocysts per gram (OPG) were calculated as: EPG or OPG =  (n/0.15) ×  V/m, where n is the mean number of eggs or oocysts in two counting chambers and 0.15 is the volume of each counting chamber, whereas V and m are the volume of the homogenized faecal sample and weight of faeces, respectively; in this case V= 60 ml and m= 2 g.

Data analysis

The prevalence and quantitative data were analysed statistically. The EPG or OPG values from the tests with each combination of preservation method and flotation solution were calculated. EPG or OPG value was the dependent variable, while the independent variables were the preservation method and flotation solution. The normality of the data was tested separately using a Shapiro–Wilk test, after which, because of the non-normality of the data, the Kruskal–Wallis extension test (Dytham, Reference Dytham2003) was used to reveal differences among the selected preservation methods and flotation solutions. For significant differences, the McNemar test was applied for post-hoc multiple comparisons. The significance threshold of the post-hoc multiple comparison test was 0.01 (α = 0.01). The sequential Holm–Bonferroni correction was used to control Type I error. The gold-standard flotation solution or preservation method was defined as the solution or method that produced the highest EPG or OPG (Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Coles, Maurelli, Musella and Cringoli2011). The paired-sample t-test was used to reveal differences in the prevalence of nematode and coccidia in the faecal samples exposed to the nine combinations. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA).

Results

For detection of nematode eggs, the interaction between preservation method and flotation solution and the differences among the selected preservation methods were not significant (P > 0.01), but the differences among the selected flotation solutions were significant (P <  0.01). Of the nine processing combinations, the gold standard was obtained with a combination of freezing and sodium nitrate (EPG = 209.4 ± 67.8), which was significantly higher than that of the other eight combinations (table 1; P <  0.01). The difference between sodium chloride and magnesium sulphate was not significant (P > 0.01).

Table 1

The prevalence (%) and mean number of nematode eggs (EPG) in faecal samples of forest musk deer preserved in formalin, ethanol or subjected to freezing and then to flotation in saturated solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium nitrate (NaNO3) or magnesium sulphate (MgSO4).

With respect to coccidian oocysts, the interaction between preservation method and flotation solution and the differences among preservation methods were significant (P <  0.01), but the differences among flotation solutions were not significant (P > 0.01). Of the nine processing combinations, the gold standard was obtained with a combination of preservation in 10% formalin and sodium chloride, with OPG = 1010.7 ± 162.3 (table 2). The post-hoc multiple comparison tests for preservation methods showed that the coccidia OPG value resulting from formalin preservation was significantly higher than that produced by the other two methods (P <  0.01), but the difference between freezing and alcohol preservation was not significant (P > 0.01).

Table 2

The prevalence (%) and mean number of coccidian oocysts (OPG) in faecal samples of forest musk deer preserved in formalin, ethanol or subjected to freezing and then to flotation in saturated solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium nitrate (NaNO3) or magnesium sulphate (MgSO4).

The values of nematode and coccidian prevalence obtained from the gold-standard processing combinations were 71.9% and 96.4%, respectively. Paired-sample t-test showed that the coccidian parasite load in the faecal samples was significantly greater than the nematode load (t= − 5.62, df = 8, P= 0.001).

Discussion

There are many factors that can influence the result of faecal egg evaluation (Rupasinghe & Ogbourne, Reference Rupasinghe and Ogbourne1978; Foreyt, Reference Foreyt1986; McKenna, Reference McKenna1998; Cringoli et al., Reference Cringoli, Rinaldi, Veneziano, Capelli and Scala2004; Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Coles, Maurelli, Musella and Cringoli2011). The results of the present study showed that the flotation solution was the most important factor influencing nematode egg estimation, with sodium nitrate being the gold standard with the highest EPG. In addition, there was an interaction between preservation method and flotation solution for coccidian oocysts, while the combination of formalin and sodium chloride was the gold standard with the highest OPG.

The effect of preservation method on parasite detection varies across the parasite taxa and the host. Preservation in potassium dichromate was more suitable for the detection of coccidia in rabbits and poultry (Garcia-Lopez et al., Reference García-López, Rodríguez-Tovar and Medina-De la Garza1996; Wunderlin et al., Reference Wunderlin, Wild and Eckert1997; Hobbs et al., Reference Hobbs, Twigg, Elliot and Wheeler1999). However, freezing was the most reliable and least biased preservation method for strongylid nematode eggs of horses (Nielsen et al., Reference Nielsen, Vidyashankar, Andersen, DeLisi, Pilegaard and Kaplan2010; Jagla et al., 2013). With respect to Dicrocoelium dendriticum and Moniezia expansa in sheep, formalin and freezing showed similar performance, but vacuum packing with storage at 4°C was the best preservation method for counting gastrointestinal (GI) strongyle eggs (Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Coles, Maurelli, Musella and Cringoli2011). Jagla et al. (2013) suggested that chemical preservation should be considered only when the use of low temperatures to count strongylid nematode eggs is impossible. The present study found that freezing performed better than formalin and alcohol for nematode egg counting.

The type of flotation solution can significantly influence the accuracy of quantitative analyses of parasites in faeces. The present study showed that the best flotation solution was not the solution with the highest specific gravity, although it floated more faecal debris. A high amount of faecal debris makes microscopic examination difficult, as debris traps some eggs and oocysts at the bottom of the McMaster chamber and obstructs viewing (Haug et al., Reference Haug, Williams and Larsen2006; Vadlejch et al., Reference Vadlejch, Petrtýl, Lukešová, Čadková, Kudrnáčová, Jankovská and Langrová2013). In contrast, the best solution for counting GI strongyle eggs in sheep was sucrose solution, while potassium iodomercurate was best for D. dendriticum (Cringoli et al., Reference Cringoli, Rinaldi, Veneziano, Capelli and Scala2004). Taking into account the cost and ease of preparation, sodium chloride was the best solution for nematode and cestode eggs, while zinc sulphate was best for trematode eggs and nematode larvae in sheep (Rinaldi et al., Reference Rinaldi, Coles, Maurelli, Musella and Cringoli2011). In comparision, the best solution for Ascaris suum eggs in pigs was salt solution containing sucrose (Pereckienė et al., Reference Pereckienė, Kaziūnaitė, Vyšniauskas, Petkevičius, Malakauskas, Šarkūnas and Taylor2007).

In this study, the prevalence values of nematodes and coccidia in the 33 tested deer were 71.9% and 96.4%, respectively (table 1, table 2). The prevalence values of both tested parasites were higher than those in wild alpine musk deer (nematodes: 38.0%; coccidia: 49.3%; Lu et al., Reference Lu, Qiao, Wu, Wang, Hu, Pei, Zhang, Feng, Wang, Kong and Li2010) and Tianshan red deer (nematodes: 25.8%; coccidia: 0.7%; Amila et al., Reference Amila, Risalat, Aysajan, Rizihan, Zhou and Mahmut2014). The first reason for these high prevalence values is anthelmintic abuse, leading to widespread loss of effect of benzimidazole compounds and pyrantel salts which can no longer control parasite invasions (Comer et al., Reference Comer, Coles and Hillyer2001; Gawor, Reference Gawor2006; Flohr et al., Reference Flohr, Tuyen, Lewis, Minh, Campbell, Britton, Williams, Hien, Farrar and Quinnell2007). All forest musk deer are subjected to deworming several times per year, irrespective of whether they are parasite-free or infected to only a slight degree, which leads inevitably to drug resistance in parasites (Jagla et al., 2013). The second reason for the high prevalence is that the host has been under stress for a lengthy period (Oppliger et al., Reference Oppliger, Clobert, Lecomte, Lorenzon, Boudjemadi and John-Alder1998; Ran, Reference Ran2013). Forest musk deer are very shy, solitary animals that are particularly susceptible to several stressors commonly encountered in captivity, including increased population density (He et al., Reference He, Wang, Li, Liu, Liu, Liu, Qi and Hu2014), disturbances caused by human activities, and changing food types (Liu, Reference Liu2008; Lang, Reference Lang2013). Finally, cross-contamination is a potentially significant, but often ignored, factor that increases the risk of parasitic infection.

The present study provides details of the optimized preservation method and flotation solution for detection of parasite eggs or oocysts in faecal samples, as well as a simple and easy counting method, for use with forest musk deer. These findings lay the foundation for parasitological surveillance in wild and captive forest musk deer. Furthermore, we confirmed that captive forest musk deer suffer from serious parasite invasions and require targeted management.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Breeding Center of Forest Musk Deer in Shaanxi Province, especially Mr Cun-xuan Li and Mr. Bao-qing Liu for their help and support. We are grateful to Jonathan Warner for his professional scientific editing advice to substantially improve the style of English writing and grammar. Our deepest gratitude goes to the anonymous reviewers and the editors for their careful work and thoughtful suggestions that have helped improve this paper substantially.

Financial support

This work was financed by the Species Salvation Program of the Department of Fauna and Flora and Nature Reserve Management, State Forestry Administration of China (no. musk deer 2013).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guides on the care and use of laboratory animals. The faecal sampling (non-invasive method) was carried out under the authority of a scientific permit issued by the Shaanxi Forestry Bureau, Shaanxi, China. Our non-invasive sampling method was used to collect faeces only.

References

Amila, A., Risalat, T., Aysajan, T., Rizihan, A., Zhou, C. & Mahmut, H. (2014) Intestinal parasites of Tianshan red deer in Nanshan Mountains areas in Xinjiang. Acta Theriologica Sinica 34, 87–92 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Bowman, D.D. (2014) Georgis’ parasitology for veterinarians. Philadelphia, Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar
Comer, K., Coles, G.C. & Hillyer, M. (2001) A national survey for anthelmintic resistant nematodes in thoroughbreds. Eighteenth International Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology, Stresa, Italy, August, vol. 26.Google Scholar
Cringoli, G. (2006) FLOTAC, a novel apparatus for a multivalent faecal egg count technique. Parassitologia 48, 381–384.Google Scholar
Cringoli, G., Rinaldi, L., Veneziano, V., Capelli, G. & Scala, A. (2004) The influence of floatation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology 123, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cringoli, G., Rinaldi, L., Maurelli, M.P. & Utzinger, J. (2010) FLOTAC: new multivalent techniques for qualitative and quantitative copromicroscopic diagnosis of parasites in animals and humans. Nature Protocols 5, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dytham, C. (2003) Scheirer–Ray–Hare test. Choosing and using statistics: A biologist's guide. pp. 145–150. Chichester, UK, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Flohr, C., Tuyen, L.N., Lewis, S., Minh, T.T., Campbell, J., Britton, J., Williams, H., Hien, T.T., Farrar, J. & Quinnell, R.J. (2007) Low efficacy of mebendazole against hookworm in Vietnam: two randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 76, 732–736.Google Scholar
Foreyt, W.J. (1986) Recovery of nematode eggs and larvae in deer: evaluation of fecal preservation methods. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 189, 1065–1067.Google Scholar
Foreyt, W.J. (2001) Veterinary parasitology reference manual. Ames, Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
García-López, H.L., Rodríguez-Tovar, L.E. & Medina-De la Garza, C.E. (1996) Identification of Cyclospora in poultry. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2, 356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawor, J. (2006) Studies on small strongyles (Cyathostominae) and their eradication in riding horses with special reference to drug resistance. Warszawa, Instytut Parazytologii, Polska Akademia Nauk.Google Scholar
Gordon, H. & Whitlock, H.V. (1939) Helminth diagnostic techniques. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research in Australia 12, 50–52.Google Scholar
Haug, A., Williams, R.B. & Larsen, S. (2006) Counting coccidial oocysts in chicken faeces: a comparative study of a standard McMaster technique and a new rapid method. Veterinary Parasitology 136, 233–242.Google Scholar
He, L., Wang, W.X., Li, L.H., Liu, B.Q., Liu, G., Liu, S.Q., Qi, L. & Hu, D.F. (2014) Effects of crowding and sex on fecal cortisol levels of captive forest musk deer. Biological Research 1, 47–48.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R.P., Twigg, L.E., Elliot, A.D. & Wheeler, A.G. (1999) Factors influencing the fecal egg and oocyst counts of parasites of wild European rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) in Southern Western Australia. Journal of Parasitology 85, 796–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagła, E., Śpiewak, J., Zaleśny, G. & Popiołek, M. (2013) Effect of storage and preservation of horse faecal samples on the detectability and viability of Strongylid nematode eggs and larvae. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 57, 161–165.Google Scholar
Lang, D.M. (2013) Non-invasive study of steroid hormone and immune globulin in captive musk deer. Beijing, Beijing Forestry University (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Liu, C.Y. (2008) A study on reasons of death and physiological features for breeding forest musk deer. Shanghai, East China Normal University (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Liu, Z.B., Cheng, J.G. & Dai, X.Y. (2002) Regional distribution and measures of coccidiosis of captive forest musk deer. China Herbivores 22, 46 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Lu, X.H., Qiao, J.Y., Wu, X.M. & Su, L.N. (2009) A review of main effects of musk-deer diseases: purulent, respiratory system and parasitic diseases. Journal of Economic Animal 13, 104–107 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Lu, X.H., Qiao, J.Y., Wu, X.M., Wang, J., Hu, H., Pei, J.F., Zhang, H.F., Feng, T., Wang, Q.J., Kong, F. & Li, D.F. (2010) An investigation on GI parasites of alpine musk deer in Qinghai province. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Medicine 12, 56–57 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
McKenna, P.B. (1998) The effect of previous cold storage on the subsequent recovery of infective third stage nematode larvae from sheep faeces. Veterinary Parasitology 80, 167–172.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M.K., Vidyashankar, A.N., Andersen, U.V., DeLisi, K., Pilegaard, K. & Kaplan, R.M. (2010) Effects of fecal collection and storage factors on strongylid egg counts in horses. Veterinary Parasitology 167, 55–61.Google Scholar
Oppliger, A., Clobert, J., Lecomte, J., Lorenzon, P., Boudjemadi, K. & John-Alder, H.B. (1998) Environmental stress increases the prevalence and intensity of blood parasite infection in the common lizard Lacerta vivipara . Ecology Letters 1, 129–138.Google Scholar
Pereckienė, A., Kaziūnaitė, V., Vyšniauskas, A., Petkevičius, S., Malakauskas, A., Šarkūnas, M. & Taylor, M.A. (2007) A comparison of modifications of the McMaster method for the enumeration of Ascaris suum eggs in pig faecal samples. Veterinary Parasitology 149, 111–116.Google Scholar
Ran, X.L. (2013) Stress response and intestinal parasites in Taihangshan macaques within tourism area, Jiyuan. Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou University (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Rinaldi, L., Coles, G.C., Maurelli, M.P., Musella, V. & Cringoli, G. (2011) Calibration and diagnostic accuracy of simple floatation, McMaster and FLOTAC for parasite egg counts in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology 177, 345–352.Google Scholar
Roepstorff, A. & Nansen, P. (1998) Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of helminth parasites of swine. Vol. 3. Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
Rupasinghe, D. & Ogbourne, C.P. (1978) Laboratory studies on the effect of temperature on the development of the free-living stages of some strongylid nematodes of the horse. Parasitology Research 55, 249–253.Google Scholar
Sha, G.R., Zhang, H.X., Cai, Y.H. & Wang, H.Y. (1994) The first detecting of Strongyloides papillosus in domestic Moschus berezovskii . Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine 1, 10–12 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Sha, G.R., Zhang, H.X., Cai, Y.H., Wang, H.Y. & Liu, H.Y. (1995) A survey on parasites of domestic Moschus berezovskii in Sichuan province. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 1 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Sha, G.R., Yang, G.Y. & Cai, Y.H. (1998) Studies on epidemiology of Moniezia sichuanensis in domestic Moschus berezovskii . Journal of China Agricultural University S2, 146–146 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Vadlejch, J., Petrtýl, M., Lukešová, D., Čadková, Z., Kudrnáčová, M., Jankovská, I. & Langrová, I. (2013) The concentration McMaster technique is suitable for quantification of coccidia oocysts in bird droppings. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 33, 291–295.Google Scholar
Ward, M.P., Lyndal-Murphy, M. & Baldock, F.C. (1997) Evaluation of a composite method for counting helminth eggs in cattle faeces. Veterinary Parasitology 73, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetzel, R. (1951) Verbesserte McMaster-Kammer zum Auszählen von Wurmeiern. Tierärztl Umsch 6, 209–210.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Jiang, X.L., Yu, J.F., Ma, F.H. & Wang, S.Z. (1983) A research on parasites of forest musk deer. Chinese Wildlife 3(013), 35–38 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wunderlin, E., Wild, P. & Eckert, J. (1997) Comparative reproduction of Cryptosporidium baileyi in embryonated eggs and in chickens. Parasitology Research 83, 712–715.Google Scholar
Yang, G.Y., Sha, G.R., Cai, Y.H. & Cheng, J.G. (2001) Pathogenic morphological observation of Moniezia sichuanensis in domestic Moschus berezovskii . Livestock and Poultry Industry 3, 49 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Ying, Z.H. (1992) One case of parasite invasions of forest musk deer. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 4, 36 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zajicek, D. (1978) Comparison of efficiency of 2 quantitative ovoscopical methods. Veterinarni Medicina 23, 275–282.Google Scholar
Zhu, C.S. (1991) A preliminary survey on parasites of forest musk deer in Zhenping farm of Shaanxi province. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine 3(011), 26–28 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1The prevalence (%) and mean number of nematode eggs (EPG) in faecal samples of forest musk deer preserved in formalin, ethanol or subjected to freezing and then to flotation in saturated solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium nitrate (NaNO3) or magnesium sulphate (MgSO4).

Figure 1

Table 2The prevalence (%) and mean number of coccidian oocysts (OPG) in faecal samples of forest musk deer preserved in formalin, ethanol or subjected to freezing and then to flotation in saturated solutions of sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium nitrate (NaNO3) or magnesium sulphate (MgSO4).