Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:42:47.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defects in amorphous phase-change materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2013

Jennifer Luckas
Affiliation:
I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany; and Laboratoire de Génie Electrique de Paris (CNRS UMR 8507), Supelec, Universités Paris VI et XI, Plateau de Moulon, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France
Daniel Krebs
Affiliation:
IBM Zürich Research Laboratory, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland
Stephanie Grothe
Affiliation:
I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany
Josef Klomfaß
Affiliation:
IEF-5 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Reinhard Carius
Affiliation:
IEF-5 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
Christophe Longeaud
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génie Electrique de Paris (CNRS UMR 8507), Supelec, Universités Paris VI et XI, Plateau de Moulon, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France
Matthias Wuttig*
Affiliation:
I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany; and JARA Fundamentals of Future Information Technology, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: wuttig@physik-rwth-aachen.de

Abstract

Understanding the physical origin of threshold switching and resistance drift phenomena is necessary for making a breakthrough in the performance of low-cost nanoscale technologies related to nonvolatile phase-change memories. Even though both phenomena of threshold switching and resistance drift are often attributed to localized states in the band gap, the distribution of defect states in amorphous phase-change materials (PCMs) has not received so far, the level of attention that it merits. This work presents an experimental study of defects in amorphous PCMs using modulated photocurrent experiments and photothermal deflection spectroscopy. This study of electrically switching alloys involving germanium (Ge), antimony (Sb) and tellurium (Te) such as amorphous germanium telluride (a-GeTe), a-Ge15Te85 and a-Ge2Sb2Te5 demonstrates that those compositions showing a high electrical threshold field also show a high defect density. This result supports a mechanism of recombination and field-induced generation driving threshold switching in amorphous chalcogenides. Furthermore, this work provides strong experimental evidence for complex trap kinetics during resistance drift. This work reports annihilation of deep states and an increase in shallow defect density accompanied by band gap widening in aged a-GeTe thin films.

Information

Type
Invited Feature Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Hole trap states within the band gap (indicated by red lines and localized wave functions Ψ) capture free holes from the valence band. After a certain time a hole trapped at Eω is thermally released back to the valence band. These trapping and release processes repeat continuously. This interrupted extended state transport is denoted as multiple trapping transport for which the basic MPC formulas are derived by solving the corresponding rate equations, see Ref. 18–20.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. In p-type materials MPC experiments probe the defect state concentration N of those multiple trapping levels above the valence band edge Ev, whose emission rate e(Eω,T) equals the excitation frequency ω of the exciting light source, i.e., e(Eω,T) = ω > recombination rate. The two decreasing full lines represent the variations of e(E,T) with E for two temperatures T1 (blue) and T2 (red). At a given temperature T states within a certain energy range can be probed using an applicable ω range (blue shaded range at T1 and red shaded range at T2 > T1). Hence, a systematic variation of excitation frequency ω and temperature T enables a spectroscopic scan of the defect state distribution.

Figure 2

TABLE I. Electrical threshold fields and optical band gaps for different amorphous deposited chalcogenides taken from the literature as compared with reduced defect state densities Nc/μ describing valence band tail (VB), shallow (L1) and deep (L2) defect state densities presented in this work.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Defect state densities Nc/μ measured by MPC experiments in a-GeTe, a-Ge2Sb2Te5 and a-Ge15Te85 thin films. The MPC data shown here are scaled using Eq. (5), which takes the temperature dependence of the band gap into account. Both phase-change alloys (a-GeTe and a-Ge2Sb2Te5) show three characteristic defect state distributions: valence band tail states probed from 90 to 210 K (VB), shallow defect states located at ∼0.2 eV from the valence band edge Ev detected from 220 to 250 K (L1 defects) and deep defect states measured from 260 to 300 K (L2 defects). In contrast to a-GeTe and a-Ge2Sb2Te5, a-Ge15Te85 presents only valence band tail states over the whole investigated temperature range. Amorphous GeTe presents the highest density of deep (L2: Nc/μ = 5 × 1010/cm2 V/eV) as well as shallow trap states (L1: Nc/μ = 1 × 1010/cm2 V/eV), followed by a-Ge2Sb2Te5 (L2: Nc/μ = 1 × 1010/cm2 V/eV and L1: Nc/μ = 4 × 109/cm2 V/eV). In contrast to both PCMs a-Ge15Te85 shows no L1 or L2 defect distributions and valence band tail densities are measured down to Nc/μ = 108/cm2 V/eV close to mid gap.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Evolution of the amorphous state resistivity measured during annealing chalcogenide thin films at 50 °C. For a better data visualization the experimental time scale is shifted by ts, see Eq. (6). In all three alloys, this evolution of the amorphous state resistivity is correctly described by a power law. The drift exponent αRD is observed to be rather high in both investigated phase-change alloys a-GeTe (αRD = 0.129) and a-Ge2Sb2Te5 (αRD = 0.120) indicating a strong drift in resistivity. In comparison a-Ge15Te85 shows a much lower value αRD = 0.056 and thus a lower drift in resistivity.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Defect state densities Nc/μ measured by MPC experiments in the same a-GeTe thin film at different sample ages of 29 days (a) and 108 days (b) after deposition. The MPC spectra shown here are scaled according to Eq. (5) taking the influence of a temperature-dependent band gap into account. The temporal change in defect state density shows no simple picture: Whereas deep in the gap a lower trap state density is detected, the density of shallow L1 defects is observed to increase with time as well as the MPC DOS at ∼0.35 eV. In contrast, no drastic change in the valence band tail density can be stated. However, the stronger bending of the MPC curves taken from 100 to 180 K indicates an eventual change of the ξ parameter upon aging which describes the parabolic decrease of the optical band gap with increasing temperature.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. Absorption coefficient α(E) measured by photothermal spectroscopy (PDS) in amorphous as-deposited and postannealed a-GeTe thin films. The postannealed sample has been heated for 1 h at THOLD = 140 °C. In both investigated amorphous samples the absorption coefficient α increases first exponentially with increasing photon energy E, i.e., α(E) ∼ exp(E/Eu). Annealing shows no significant influence on the Urbach energy Eu, which reflects the width of the valence and conduction band tails. Even though no drastic change in the band tail states upon annealing could be verified by PDS, these measurements reveal a shift of α(E) toward higher photon energies. This shift upon annealing is caused by band gap opening.16

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Optical band gaps Eg and activation energies of conductivity Ea measured in amorphous deposited and postannealed GeTe-thin films heated for 1 h at the indicated holding temperature THOLD. Optical band gaps and activation energy increase upon annealing, where the increase is linear with increasing holding temperature THOLD.