Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T14:29:43.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ideal distribution models and the tempo of agricultural development in a windward valley of Hawaiʻi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2023

Seth Quintus*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Hawaiʻi
Timothy M. Rieth
Affiliation:
International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., Honolulu, Hawai‘i
Thomas Dye
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Hawaiʻi
Alexander E. Morrison
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Hawaiʻi
Christopher W. Filimoehala
Affiliation:
International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., Honolulu, Hawai‘i
Darby Filimoehala
Affiliation:
International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., Honolulu, Hawai‘i
Jon Tulchin
Affiliation:
Wahi Kūpuna Program, Kamehameha Schools, Honolulu, Hawai‘i
Trever Duarte
Affiliation:
Wahi Kūpuna Program, Kamehameha Schools, Honolulu, Hawai‘i
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ squintus@hawaii.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Across the Pacific, agricultural systems have used two main complementary cultivation regimes: irrigated farming of wet environments and rain-fed cropping of drylands. These strategies have different productive potential and labour needs, which has structured their temporal and spatial distributions. Although these approaches have been studied a great deal at a general level, there has been less work on the local use and significance of these strategies. Here, the authors evaluate ideal distribution models of agricultural activities in the Punalu‘u valley on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i, to assess how habitat suitability changed as a result of infrastructural investment and dynamic environmental, social and demographic change. The results are of relevance for contemporary initiatives to revive Indigenous agricultural systems in Hawai‘i and beyond.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Rules, expectations, signatures and results for agricultural development in Punaluʻu derived from ideal distribution models (figure by Seth Quintus).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The location of Punaluʻu on Oʻahu. The dark line is the shoreline, while the lighter lines are 100m contours (figure by Seth Quintus).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Location of the two agricultural systems in Punalu‘u Valley. The dark line is the shoreline and the light lines are 40m contours (figure by Seth Quintus).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Plan view map of the loʻi complex with trench locations. The stream is located to the north of the system and the intake ditch is located to the south (figure by Chris Filimoehala).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Modelled radiocarbon dates associated with relevant colluvial slope and irrigated infrastructure in Punaluʻu (figure by Seth Quintus).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Estimated construction ages for 22 features across the colluvial slopes and irrigated systems (figure by Seth Quintus).

Figure 6

Figure 7. a) Small-scale boulder alignment at the base of Trench 7; note the position of the alignment among smaller alluvial cobbles. b) The relationship between fine and coarse alluvial sediments visible in Trench 6; both walls were built in the upper fine sediments. c) The surface and buried retaining wall of Trench 9; the lower wall was built on top of coarse alluvial deposits (figure by Seth Quintus).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Tempo plot comparing the construction of infrastructure across the lo‘i (top) and colluvial slopes (bottom) (figure by Tom Dye).

Supplementary material: File

Quintus et al. supplementary material

Quintus et al. supplementary material 1

Download Quintus et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Quintus et al. supplementary material

Quintus et al. supplementary material 2

Download Quintus et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Quintus et al. supplementary material

Quintus et al. supplementary material 3

Download Quintus et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Quintus et al. supplementary material

Quintus et al. supplementary material 4

Download Quintus et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.9 MB