Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T20:34:09.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum: a two-centre experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Shyam K. Sathanandam
Affiliation:
Advocate Children’s Hospital, Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States of America University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children’s Hospital Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Ranjit Philip*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children’s Hospital Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
David Gamboa
Affiliation:
Advocate Children’s Hospital, Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States of America School of Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
Andrew Van Bergen
Affiliation:
Advocate Children’s Hospital, Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States of America
Michel N. Ilbawi
Affiliation:
Advocate Children’s Hospital, Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States of America
Christopher Knott-Craig
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children’s Hospital Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
B. Rush Waller
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children’s Hospital Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
Alexander J. Javois
Affiliation:
Advocate Children’s Hospital, Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States of America
Bettina F. Cuneo
Affiliation:
Advocate Children’s Hospital, Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States of America Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: R. Philip, MD, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, Heart Institute, 3rd Floor, 50 N. Dunlap Street, Memphis, TN 38103, United States of America. Tel: +901- 287-5092; Fax: +901-287-4646; E-mail: rphilip@uthsc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with an intact atrial septum is a poor predictor of outcomes. Prenatal assessment of pulmonary venous Doppler and emergent postnatal cardiac intervention may be associated with better outcomes.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of all hypoplastic left heart syndrome patients in two centres over a 5-year period was performed. Group 1 included patients with adequate inter-atrial communication. Group 2 included patients with prenatal diagnosis with an intact atrial septum who had immediate transcatheter intervention. Group 3 included patients with intact atrial septum who were not prenatally diagnosed and underwent either delayed intervention or no intervention before stage 1 palliation. Primary outcome was survival up to stage 2 palliation.

Results

The incidence of hypoplastic left heart syndrome with a restrictive atrial communication was 11.2% (n=19 of 170). Overall survival to stage 2 or heart transplantation was 85% and 67% for Groups 1 and 2, respectively (n=129/151, n=8/12; p=0.03), and 0% (n=0/7) for Group 3. Survival benefits were observed between Groups 2 and 3 (p<0.001). Foetal pulmonary vein Doppler reverse/forward velocity time integral ratio of ⩾18% (sensitivity, 0.99, 95% CI, 0.58–1; specificity, 0.99, 95% CI, 0.96–1) was predictive of the need for emergent left atrial decompression.

Conclusion

Using a multidisciplinary approach and foetal pulmonary vein Doppler, time-saving measures can be instituted by delivering prenatally diagnosed neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum close to the cardiac catheterisation suite where left atrial decompression can be performed quickly and safely that may improve survival.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Comparison of variables between the three subgroups.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Transabdominal foetal echocardiogram. (a) Foetal 2D echocardiogram demonstrating thickened, intact inter-atrial septum in the presence of hypoplastic left ventricle at 28 weeks of gestation. (b) Foetal Doppler flow interrogation of the pulmonary vein showing three different pulmonary vein Doppler patterns (Type A, B, and C). Arrows=atrial septum; LA=left atrium; MB=moderator band; PV=pulmonary vein; RA=right atrium; RV=right ventricle.

Figure 2

Table 2 Comparison between patients in Groups 2 and 3.

Figure 3

Figure 2 Fluoroscopy and 2D Echocardiogram. (a) Contrast staining of the inter-atrial septum (arrow) shows an intact septum that is bowing towards the right atrium. (b) After radiofrequency perforation of the intact atrial septum with a sheath now across it. Angiogram demonstrates dilated right and left pulmonary veins (arrow) that fill retrograde from the diminutive left atrium. The pulmonary venous tributaries appear dilated and tortuous. (c) After stent implantation across the inter-atrial septum (arrow). (d) After stent implantation across the inter-atrial septum (arrow). Angiogram demonstrates unobstructed left-to-right shunt. (e) Postnatal 2D transthoracic echocardiogram shows a hypoplastic left atrium. Arrow points to the intact atrial septum that is thickened and bowing to the right. (f) TEE demonstrating the radiofrequency perforating wire (arrow) intending the atrial septum. (g) TEE demonstrating the radiofrequency perforating wire (arrow) across the atrial septum into the left atrium after perforation with 5 W of energy for 5 seconds. (h) Post-procedure 2D transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrates the stent (arrow) implanted across the atrial septum with decompression of the left atrium. LA=left atrium; RA=right atrium.

Figure 4

Figure 3 Inter-atrial stent. Post-mortem of the one patient who had radiofrequency perforation and stent implantation. The figure illustrates the stent across the inter-atrial septum (arrow) as seen from the right atrium (a) and the left atrium (b). The stent is in a good position. The patient died secondary to retrograde aortic arch obstruction, 5 days after the Hybrid procedure.

Figure 5

Table 3 Description of patients in Group 2.

Figure 6

Table 4 Description of patients in Group 3.

Figure 7

Figure 4 Survival curves. (a) Kaplan–Meier Survival Curve comparing Groups 1, 2, and 3. (b) Survival plot generated by Cox-Regression comparing the three groups.