Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:46:57.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protic ionic liquids: Fuel cell applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2013

Tomohiro Yasuda
Affiliation:
Cooperative Research and Development Center, Yokohama National University, Japan; yasuda@ynu.ac.jp
Masayoshi Watanabe
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry & Biotechnology, Yokohama National University, Japan; mwatanab@ynu.ac.jp

Abstract

We have investigated protic ionic liquids (PILs) as proton conductors for non-humidified intermediate-temperature fuel cells. PILs exhibit proton conductivity and activity in fuel cell electrode reactions, as seen in acidic aqueous solutions and acidic polymer membranes. The wide molecular designability of PILs enabled the finding of a promising candidate, diethylmethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate ([dema][ TfO]), which exhibits favorable bulk properties and electrochemical activity. Solid thin films containing [dema][ TfO] were fabricated using sulfonated polyimide as a matrix polymer. By using the composite membrane, non-humidifying fuel cell operation at 120°C succeeded. The fuel cell performance can be further improved by the optimization of the catalyst layer and with further research on PILs.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

Scheme 1. Typical synthetic routes for ionic liquid. Aprotic ionic liquids are synthesized by quaternization reaction (alkylation) of imidazole (or amine), followed by anion exchange reaction (a), while protic ionic liquids are synthesized by neutralization reaction between the Brønsted acid and base (b). Note: TFSI, bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Illustration of proton conduction in acidic aqueous solutions and in protic ionic liquids. The men represent water or base, while the balls represent protons.25

Figure 2

Figure 2. Diffusion coefficient of protons (Dσ) and water self-diffusion coefficient ($\left( {D_{H_2 } _O } \right)$) in aqueous HCl as a function of acid concentration (M). The deviation between Dσ and $D_{H_2 } _O $ corresponds to proton diffusion by the Grotthuss mechanism, while $D_{H_2 } _O $ corresponds to that by the vehicle mechanism. The contribution by the Grotthuss mechanism for proton diffusion decreases when increasing the acid concentration.25 Note: D, diffusion coefficient.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Ionic conductivity (σ) of Im/HNTf2 (HTFSI) mixtures as a function of molar fraction of imidazole (Im). σ shows peaks at 0.8∼0.9 of molar fraction of Im.28 Note: HNTf2, bis(trifluoromethane sulfone)imide acid.

Figure 4

Table I. Diffusion coefficients of protons and fluorine in imidazole/bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide acid (Im/HNTf2) mixtures.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Polarization curves of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) measured in a 0.1 M HClO4 using different working electrodes (Pd(111), Pt(111), and Pt/Pd(111)) for a comparison of solution kinetics. The sweep rate for Pd(111) and Pt/Pd(111) is 20 mV/s, while for Pt(111) it is 50 mV/s.29 Though Pt/Pd(111) shows the best activity on ORR among the three electrodes, the onset potential for ORR is lower than 1.0 V. Note: j, current density; E, potential versus RHE (reversible hydrogen electrode).

Figure 6

Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms measured in [Im][NTf2] (imidazole/ bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)amide acid) using a Pt wire working electrode at 130°C under H2, O2, or Ar at saturated conditions. Inset depicts the structure of a three electrode cell used for the measurements.28 Note: C.E., counter electrode; W.E., working electrode; R.E., reference electrode; E, potential versus RHE; RHE, reversible hydrogen electrode.

Figure 7

Scheme 2. Plausible fuel cell electrode reactions in protic ionic liquids.

Figure 8

Figure 6. (a) Chemical structure and bulk properties of (diethylmethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate) [dema][ TfO], and (b) cyclic voltammograms measured at 150°C under H2 or O2 under saturated conditions. The onset potentials of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and hydrogen oxidation reaction (HOR) are ca. 1 V and ca. 0 V versus RHE, respectively.40 Note: Tm, melting temperature; Td, decomposition temperature; σ, ionic conductivity; i, current density; E, potential from RHE; RHE, reversible hydrogen electrode.

Figure 9

Figure 7. (a) Chemical structure of sulfonated polyimide and (b) temperature (T) dependence of ionic conductivity (σ) of composite membranes under anhydrous conditions. σ of the composite membranes increases with increasing [dema][TfO] content, and thus, pure [dema][TfO] shows the highest ionic conductivity. However, at temperatures lower than the melting point (indicated by the gray line), pure [dema][TfO] shows lower ionic conductivity than that of composite membranes with [dema][TfO] higher than 50 wt%. Note: [dema][TfO], diethylmethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate.47

Figure 10

Figure 8. Polarization curve of H2/O2 non-humidifying fuel cell using a sulfonated polyimide/[dema][TfO] (diethylmethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate) composite membrane at 120°C. The maximum current density is 400 mA cm−2, while the maximum power density is ca. 100 mW cm−2.48