Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T07:36:55.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paleometry as a key tool to deal with paleobiological and astrobiological issues: some contributions and reflections on the Brazilian fossil record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2019

Amanda L. S. Gomes
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia e Monitoramento Ambiental, Universidade Federalde São Carlos campus Sorocaba, Rod. João Leme dos Santos km 110, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, Brazil
Bruno Becker-Kerber
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Washington Luiz 325 km, CEP 13565-905, São Carlos, Brazil
Gabriel L. Osés
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Washington Luiz 325 km, CEP 13565-905, São Carlos, Brazil
Gustavo Prado
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Lago 562, CEP 05508-080, São Paulo, Brazil
Pedro Becker Kerber
Affiliation:
Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Cidade Universitária, Av. Costa e Silva – Pioneiros, CEP 79070-900, Campo Grande, Brazil
Gabriel E. B. de Barros
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos – campus Sorocaba, Rod. João Leme dos Santos km 110, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, Brazil
Douglas Galante
Affiliation:
Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials, Av. Giuseppe Maximo Scolfaro, 10000, CEP 13083-100, Campinas, Brazil
Elidiane Rangel
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Unidade Diferenciada Sorocaba, Av. 3 de março, 511, Alto da Boa Vista, 18087180, Sorocaba, Brazil
Pidassa Bidola
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Medical Engineering, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
Julia Herzen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Medical Engineering, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
Franz Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Medical Engineering, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
Márcia A. Rizzutto
Affiliation:
Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa R 187, CEP 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil
Mírian L. A. F. Pacheco*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos – campus Sorocaba, Rod. João Leme dos Santos km 110, CEP 18052-780, Sorocaba, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Mírian L. A. F. Pacheco, E-mail: forancelli.ufscar@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Investigations into the existence of life in other parts of the cosmos find strong parallels with studies of the origin and evolution of life on our own planet. In this way, astrobiology and paleobiology are married by their common interest in disentangling the interconnections between life and the surrounding environment. In this way, a cross-point of both sciences is paleometry, which involves a myriad of imaging and geochemical techniques, usually non-destructive, applied to the investigation of the fossil record. In the last decades, paleometry has benefited from an unprecedented technological improvement, thus solving old questions and raising new ones. This advance has been paralleled by conceptual approaches and discoveries fuelled by technological evolution in astrobiological research. In this context, we present some new data and review recent advances on the employment of paleometry to investigations on paleobiology and astrobiology in Brazil in areas such biosignatures in Ediacaran microbial mats, biogenicity tests on enigmatic Ediacaran structures, research on Ediacaran metazoan biomineralization, fossil preservation in Cretaceous insects and fish, and finally the experimental study on the decay of fish to test the effect of distinct types of sediment on soft-tissue preservation, as well as the effects of early diagenesis on fish bone preservation.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Localization of the geological units addressed here and their respective general stratigraphic columns. (1) Corumbá Group, Tamengo Formation, Mato Grosso do Sul state (based on Parry et al., 2017). (2) Chapada Group, Unit 2, Mato Grosso do Sul state (based on Becker-Kerber et al., 2017a). (3) Itajaí Basin, Santa Catarina state (based on Guadagnin et al., 2010). (4) Santana Formation, Crato Member, Ceará state (based on Osés et al., 2017). Vector data from the geosgb CPRM database.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Different scales for biosignatures. Moving to the right, the potential biosignatures become easier to detect, but less likely to be present (adapted from Javaux and Dehant, 2010).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Raman spectra of microbial mats and host rock from the Itajaí Basin. Note the higher intensity of anatase bands in the microbial region compared to rock matrix.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Hand samples with ovoidal structures from the Tamengo Formation. (a–c) Distribution of the ovoids in bedding plane view. (d, f, g) Polished sections showing the sub-horizontal distribution of aggregates in vertical sections. (e, h) Schematic drawing of regions in (d) and (g), respectively. Scales: 0.2 mm (a, d–h); 1 mm (b); 1 cm (c).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Internal morphology of the ovoids. (a, b) Thin sections with ovoids filled with microcrystalline quartz. (c) Thin section with ovoid showing possible gas escape structures (arrow) and dark crenulated laminations. (d) Ovoid with complex and heterogeneous internal constitution. (e–h) μ-CT reconstructions of internal subdivisions (arrows and numbers i–iii). Scales: 250 µm (a); 125 µm (b); 1 mm (c); 500 µm (d).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. EDS mapping of the ovoidal structures. (a) Complete ovoid, with electron image and respective maps. (b) Edge of ovoid, with electron image and elemental maps. Note the association of Si with euhedric crystal. (c) Pseudoframboids in electron image, and its respective maps. Scales in the figure.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. SR-XRF and Raman analysis of the ovoidal structures. (a) SR-XRF map showing the distribution of Fe (red), K (green) and Si (blue). (b) Specimen examined for Raman mapping (rectangle area). (c) Map of band in ~400 cm−1, representing iron oxides. (d) Map based on PCA results for D band of kerogen. (e) Map of quartz (~465 cm−1). (f) Point analysis of the edge region of an ovoid. (g) Point analysis of the internal portion of the ovoid. Obseve D and G bands of kerogen. Scales: 500 µm (a); 200 µm (b); 50 µm (c–e).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Corumbella GP/1E 4205 (a) and Cloudina GP/1E 6218 (b) from the Tamengo Formation.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. (a) Pseudomorphs after framboidal pyrite at fossil insect (GP/1E 7105) from the Crato Member. (b, c) EDS maps of Cu and Zn, respectively (E-exoskeleton; M-matrix), of an insect (GP/1E 8440). (d) SEM image depicting muscle fibres of a fossil fish (GP/2E 7786F) from the Crato Member. This specimen was preserved at the BL facies and has been pyritized. (e) Micro SR-XRF map of Ca (red-matrix) and Fe (green-fossil) of a sample of fossil fish (GP/2E 7786F) from the BL facies. Scale in mm. (f) Petrographic thin section (GP/L 17) of a fish (GP/2E 9666) from the GL facies. Note the skin (preserved scales) surrounding bones interconnected by kerogenized soft tissue (dark and banded areas). (g) EDS point spectrum of a kerogenized tissue area of a fossil fish (GP/2E 9666) from the GL facies.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Differences in the preservation of the eyes/crystalline lens (arrows) and operculum between distinct sediments and supplies. (a) 14 cm of sand. (b) 7 cm of clay. Better preservation occurred in clay even with less vertical supply of sediment. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Different stages of decomposition according to sediment type and quantity.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Raman spectrum of fish bones rescued from different substrates. (a) Samples from 2 to 6 weeks. (b) 10–12 weeks.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Raman spectra of substrate samples from the fish experiment. (a) Spectrum from samples from 2 to 6 weeks. (b) 10–12 weeks. From top to bottom: spectra from soil (upper), clay (middle) and sand (bottom) indicating peaks at higher wavelengths, which may derive from the organic matter.

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Measurements of FWHM of Raman PO₄3− bands from fish bones.

Supplementary material: PDF

Gomes et al. supplementary material

Gomes et al. supplementary material
Download Gomes et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 128.4 KB