Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T22:17:42.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-selective band-reject FSS with dual-band near-zero refractive index based on complementary dual-layer symmetry resonator-ring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2017

Rui Xi
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Information Sensing and Understanding, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
Long Li*
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Information Sensing and Understanding, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
Yan Shi
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Information Sensing and Understanding, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
Cheng Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Information Sensing and Understanding, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
Xi Chen
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Information Sensing and Understanding, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
*
Corresponding author: L. Li Email: lilong@mail.xidian.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new band-reject frequency-selective surface (FSS) based on dual-band near-zero refractive index metamaterial (ZIM) design is presented in this paper. Consisting of a planar array of complementary dual-layer symmetry resonant ring, the proposed FSS exhibits a high-selective band-reject filtering response. From the viewpoint of effective medium, the subwavelength FSS is characterized by near-zero effective magnetic permeability and near-zero effective electric permittivity in two different operational bands, respectively. The corresponding resonant behavior and E-field distributions are analyzed in detail. A prototype of the proposed FSS working in X-band is fabricated and measured. The simulation and experiment results verify the effectiveness and correctness of the ZIM-based design method.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed CDSRR FSS. (a) Top view of the unit cell, and (b) simulation configuration.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated S parameters and extracted effective constitutive parameters of the proposed CSDRR FSS unit cell. (a) Filtering responses, (b) normalized wave impedance, (c) effective index of refraction, and (d) effective permeability and permittivity.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Electric field distribution in the xoy-plane at reflection resonances and zero-refractive-index frequencies inside the waveguide shown in Fig. 1(b) with excitation assigned on port 2. (a) Reflection zeros f1 = 6.91 GHz and f2 = 8.95 GHz, (b) reflection poles f3 = 7.17 GHz and f4 = 8.26 GHz, and (c) zero-refractive-index frequency points fz1 = 7.55 GHz (MNZ) and fz2 = 8.83 GHz (ENZ).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Electric field distribution of the proposed CSDRR FSS at reflection resonances and zero-refractive-index frequencies. (a) Reflection zeros f1 = 6.91 GHz and f2 = 8.95 GHz, (b) reflection poles f3 = 7.17 GHz and f4 = 8.26 GHz, and (c) zero-refractive-index frequency points fz1 = 7.55 GHz (MNZ) and fz2 = 8.83 GHz (ENZ).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Filtering responses of the proposed CSDRR FSS changing. (a) Inner width w1 (a = 6.3 mm, b = 8.7 mm, w2 = 4 mm, gap1 = 0.3 mm, gap2 = 3 mm, P = 18 mm, h = 3 mm), and (b) outer width w2 (a = 6.3 mm, b = 8.7 mm, w1 = 3 mm, gap1 = 0.3 mm, gap2 = 3 mm, P = 18 mm, h = 3 mm).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Filtering responses of the proposed CSDRR FSS with variation in outer annular ring slot b (a = 6.3 mm, w1 = 3 mm, w2 = 4 mm, gap1 = 0.3 mm, gap2 = 3 mm, P = 18 mm, h = 3 mm).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Frequency responses of the proposed FSS with different h. (a) Reflection coefficient, and (b) transmission coefficient.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Photograph of the fabricated FSS prototype and measurement system setup, (a) fabricated FSS prototype, and (b) measurement system setup for FSS in the near-field zone.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Comparison of measured and simulated results of the fabricated FSS. (a) S11 characteristics from one-port method, (b) S21 characteristics from two-port method, where the measurement is preformed after calibration in the near-field region, (c) retrieval effective permeability, and (d) retrieval effective permittivity.