Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:35:23.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ATTITUDES OF CIRCUMCISED WOMEN TOWARDS DISCONTINUATION OF GENITAL CUTTING OF THEIR DAUGHTERS IN KENYA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2014

SHRABONI PATRA*
Affiliation:
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, India
RAKESH KUMAR SINGH
Affiliation:
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, India
*
1Corresponding author. Email: shrageo@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Female genital cutting (FGC) is widely practised in Kenya. However, its prevalence has declined over the last two decades (38.0% in 1998 KDHS, 32.2% in 2003 KDHS and 27.1% in 2008–09 KDHS), implying changes in behaviours and attitudes of Kenyans towards FGC. This study provides an overview of changing attitudes of women towards FGC in Kenya. An extensive literature review was undertaken and 2008–09 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey data were used to focus on the present scenario. Analyses were based on a national sample of 2284 circumcised women. About 68% of these women wanted to discontinue FGC, and attitudes towards discontinuation were found to vary with women's background characteristics. Surprisingly, 92.5% of circumcised women of the North-Eastern province still wished to continue FGC, and for Muslims the percentage was 72.2%. About 36% of circumcised women responded that their daughters were already circumcised. Only 13% of circumcised mothers intended their daughters to be circumcised in the future. The study shows that the attitude of Kenyan women, irrespective of their circumcision status, has been changing gradually towards the discontinuation of circumcision of their daughters.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Conceptual framework.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Details of literature search.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Percentage of circumcised women by their level of education, 2003 KDHS and 2008–09 KDHS.

Figure 3

Table 1.Percentage distribution of circumcised women by different types of genital circumcision and their background characteristics, 2008–09 KDHS

Figure 4

Table 2.Percentage distribution of circumcised women by whether they believe the practice should continue or be stopped by selected background characteristics, 2008–09 Kenya