Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:52:23.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DNA methylation profile of liver of mice conceived by in vitro fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2021

Saúl Lira-Albarrán
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
Xiaowei Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
Seok Hee Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
Paolo Rinaudo*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Paolo Rinaudo, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW1464E, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Email: rinaudop@obgyn.ucsf.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Offspring generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) are believed to be healthy but display a possible predisposition to chronic diseases, like hypertension and glucose intolerance. Since epigenetic changes are believed to underlie such phenotype, this study aimed at describing global DNA methylation changes in the liver of adult mice generated by natural mating (FB group) or by IVF. Embryos were generated by IVF or natural mating. At 30 weeks of age, mice were sacrificed. The liver was removed, and global DNA methylation was assessed using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). Genomic Regions for Enrichment Analysis Tool (GREAT) and G:Profilerβ were used to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and for functional enrichment analysis. Overrepresented gene ontology terms were summarized with REVIGO, while canonical pathways (CPs) were identified with Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis. Overall, 2692 DMRs (4.91%) were different between the groups. The majority of DMRs (84.92%) were hypomethylated in the IVF group. Surprisingly, only 0.16% of CpG islands were differentially methylated and only a few DMRs were located on known gene promoters (n = 283) or enhancers (n = 190). Notably, the long-interspersed element (LINE), short-interspersed element (SINE), and long terminal repeat (LTR1) transposable elements showed reduced methylation (P < 0.05) in IVF livers. Cellular metabolic process, hepatic fibrosis, and insulin receptor signaling were some of the principal biological processes and CPs modified by IVF. In summary, IVF modifies the DNA methylation signature in the adult liver, resulting in hypomethylation of genes involved in metabolism and gene transcription regulation. These findings may shed light on the mechanisms underlying the developmental origin of health and disease.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution of differentially methylated regions and its genomic localization in liver samples from IVF vs. FB contrast.

Figure 1

Table 1. Percentage of methylation (mean ± SD) of cytosine in CpG, CHG, or CHH context (where H can be either A, T, or C) of transposable elements in liver samples of mice conceived by IVF or in vivo (FB group).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. a) Main non-redundant biological processes overrepresented and b) canonical pathways statistically significant, using the all list of 3259 differentially methylated genes in adult liver samples from IVF vs. FB contrast.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Canonical pathway insulin receptor signaling defined by the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. The genes highlighted in gray were differentially methylated in liver samples from male mice generated by IVF vs. FB.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Venn diagrams showing: a) 720 common differentially methylated genes (DMGs) between adult liver samples (n = 3259 DMG) and inner cell mass samples (ICM, n = 2420 DMG) in the contrast IVF vs. FB, and b) 609 shared genes between DMG in adult liver samples from IVF vs. FB (n = 3259 DMG), and the hepatic epigenetic signature that traces the developmental programming (n = 3730 genes; Colaneri, 2013).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Venn diagrams showing: a) 537 common differentially methylated genes (DMGs) between adult liver samples in the contrast IVF vs. FB (n = 3259 DMG) and DMG from liver samples of obese humans (n = 3114 DMG; Kirchner, 2018), and b) 241 shared genes between DMG in adult liver samples in the contrast IVF vs. FB (n = 3259 DMG) and DMG from liver samples of DM2-obese humans (n = 1314 DMG; Kirchner, 2018).

Supplementary material: File

Lira-Albarrán et al. supplementary material

Lira-Albarrán et al. supplementary material

Download Lira-Albarrán et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.1 MB