Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T07:50:07.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microlite-group minerals: tracers of complex post-magmatic evolution in beryl–columbite granitic pegmatites, Maršíkov District, Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2021

Štěpán Chládek*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 15, 708 33 Poruba-Ostrava, Czech Republic
Pavel Uher
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Milan Novák
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno 611 37, Czech Republic
Peter Bačík
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Economic Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Ilkovičova 6, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia
Tomáš Opletal
Affiliation:
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 12, Olomouc 771 46, Czech Republic
*
*Author for correspondence: Štěpán Chládek, Email: st.chladek@seznam.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microlite-group minerals occur as common replacement products after primary and secondary columbite-group minerals (CGM) in albitised blocky K-feldspar and in coarse-grained, muscovite-rich units of the Schinderhübel I, Scheibengraben and Bienergraben beryl–columbite pegmatites in the Maršíkov District (Silesian Unit, Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic). Textural and compositional variations of microlite-group minerals were examined using electron probe micro-analyses and microRaman spectroscopy (μRS). A complex post-magmatic evolution of the pegmatites and the following microlite populations (Mic) and related processes were found: (1) precipitation of U, Na-rich and F-poor Mic I on cracks in CGM; (2) alteration of Mic I to U-rich together with Na- and F-poor Mic II; and (3) partial replacement of Mic I and II by Mic III with a distinct Na, U and Ti loss and Ca and F gain. Stage (2) includes an extensive leaching of Na, without U loss. The final stage (3) produced euhedral-to-subhedral oscillatory zoned Ca and F enriched Mic III with distinctly different composition to the previous F-poor and A-site vacant Mic II. Aggregates of fersmite are associated commonly with Mic III. Distal Mic IIId occurs locally on cracks in K-feldspar or quartz, with compositions analogous to Mic III. Compositional variations and textural features of microlite-group minerals during dissolution–reprecipitation processes serve as sensitive tracers of post-magmatic evolution in granitic pegmatites recording complex interactions between magmatic pegmatite units and externally derived, hydrothermal metamorphic fluids.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geological map of the Silesian Domain and the Maršíkov District with individual pegmatite occurrences (modified after Cháb et al., 2007 and on-line map application of the Czech Geological Survey 2019, Chládek et al., 2020).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Idealised cross-sections of the pegmatites: (a) Maršíkov – Schinderhübel I (Chládek et al., 2020, modified); (b) Maršíkov – Scheibengraben (Novák et al., 2003, modified); (c) Sobotín – Bienergraben (Chládek et al., 2020, modified).

Figure 2

Table 1. EPMA conditions for the Nb–Ta minerals measured.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Back-scattered electron (BSE) image of Nb–Ta minerals from the pegmatites: (a) three microlite generations replacing secondary CGM: core domains of Mic I, crosscut by irregularly zoned Mic II, slightly zoned rims of darker Mic III together with tabular fersmite; Raman analysed points: 1−3 Mic I; 4 Mic II; 5 and 6 Mic III (Schinderhübel I); (b) rather homogeneous domains of Mic I characterised by a high porosity and fracturing with irregularly zoned veinlets of Mic II crosscutting Mic I, rims of darker homogeneous Mic III associated with tabular fersmite; microlite types and fersmite replace secondary patchy zoned CGM (Schinderhübel I); (c) oscillatory zoned Mic I with EMPA profile, crosscut by irregularly zoned veinlets of Mic II, rims of indistinctly zoned Mic III; microlite types replace secondary patchy zoned CGM (Schinderhübel I); (d) plot of elemental concentrations in atoms per formula unit (apfu) from core to rim of oscillatory zoned Mic I illustrated in Fig. 3c (Schinderhübel I); (e) oscillatory zoned Mic I crosscut by irregularly zoned veinlets of Mic II, rims of indistinctly zonal Mic III; microlite types replace secondary patchy zoned CGM (Schinderhübel I); (f) oscillatory zoned euhedral Mic III accompanied by tabular dark fersmite on a crack of secondary patchy zoned CGM (Schinderhübel I); (g) oscillatory zoned euhedral Mic III on a crack of secondary patchy zoned CGM (Schinderhübel I); (h) euhedral zoned grains of Mic IIId in crack-fillings in K-feldspar (Schinderhübel I). Abbreviations: Ab – albite, Kfs – K feldspar; CGM (S) – columbite-group minerals (secondary).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. BSE images of Nb–Ta minerals from the pegmatites: (a) veinlets of Mic III crosscutting oscillatory zoned primary CGM replaced by patchy domains of secondary CGM (Scheibengraben); (b) part of the Fig. 4a: veinlets of Mic III crosscutting both oscillatory zoned primary CGM and patchy domains of secondary CGM (Scheibengraben); (c) veinlets of Mic III penetrating oscillatory zoned CGM; Mic IIId chains composed of anhedral grains at the cracks of K-feldspar (Scheibengraben); (d) Mic IIId chains composed of anhedral grains on cracks of K-feldspar and quartz (Scheibengraben); (e) euhedral oscillatory zoned Mic III in vugs and cracks of the primary and secondary CGM (Bienergraben); (f) oscillatory zoned Mic III on cracks of the primary CGM (Bienergraben). Abbreviations: Ab – albite, Kfs – K feldspar; CGM (S) – columbite-group minerals (secondary); CGM (P) – columbite-group minerals (primary).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Compositions of primary and secondary CGM in a classification diagram for CGM: (a) Schinderhübel I; (b) Scheibengraben; (c) Bienergraben. Abbreviations: CGM (P) / (S) – primary (magmatic) / secondary (hydrothermal) columbite-group minerals.

Figure 6

Table 2. Representative compositions of primary (P) and secondary (S) CGM from Maršíkov District.*

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Ternary classification diagrams and F–Na plot for microlites in Schinderhübel I: (a) A-site (Na–Ca–Other cations); (b) A-site (Na–Ca–vacancy); (c) B-site (Nb–Ta–Ti); (d) F vs. Na plot; note, ‘Other cations’ represent Th, Sb, Sc, Ce, Fe, Mn and Sn in the A-site.

Figure 8

Table 3. Representative compositions of microlite (Mic) from Schinderhübel I.*

Figure 9

Table 4. Representative compositions of fersmite from Schinderhübel I.*

Figure 10

Fig. 7. Ternary classification diagrams and F–Na plot for microlites in Scheibengraben: (a) A-site (Na–Ca–Other cations); (b) A-site (Na–Ca–vacancy); (c) B-site (Nb–Ta–Ti); (d) F vs. Na plot; note ‘Other cations’ represent Th, Sb, Sc, Ce, Fe, Mn and Sn in the A-site.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Ternary classification diagrams and F-Na plot for microlites and pyrochlore in Bienergraben: (a) A-site (Na–Ca–other cations); (b) A-site (Na–Ca–vacancy); (c) B-site (Nb–Ta–Ti); (d) F versus Na plot. Note, 'Other cations' represent Th, Sb, Sc, Ce, Fe, Mn and Sn in the A-site.

Figure 12

Table 5. Representative compositions of microlite (Mic) and pyrochlore (Pcl) from Scheibengraben and Bienergraben.*

Figure 13

Fig. 9. Correlations of elemental concentrations in atoms per formula unit (apfu) in Mic I–III and IIId from Schinderhübel I: (a) Ca vs. Na; (b) Ca vs. F; (c) U vs. Ti; (d) U vs. vacancy in the A-site; (e) Ca vs. vacancy in the A-site; (f) Ca vs. U.

Figure 14

Fig. 10. Representative Raman spectra of Mic I−III from Schinderhübel I: (a) 100−1200 cm–1 region; (b) 3000−4000 cm–1 region; abbreviation: 1 (I) is number of analysis (microlite type).

Figure 15

Table 6. Raman bands and their assignments in Mic I, II and III from Schinderhübel I pegmatite (in cm–1) compared to unaltered microlite from Geisler et al. (2004).*

Figure 16

Fig. 11. Evolutionary sequence of microlite-group minerals.