Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:30:51.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Axial ratio beamwidth enhancement of a low-profile circularly polarized antenna using defected ground structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2023

Mrityunjoy Kumar Ray*
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Physics and Electronics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700009, India
Kaushik Mandal
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Physics and Electronics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700009, India
Gholamhosein Moloudian
Affiliation:
Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Dyke Parade, T12R5CP Cork, Ireland
Ali Lalbakhsh
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia School of Electrical and Data Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Mrityunjoy Kumar Ray, E-mail: kray.mrityunjoy@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the possibilities of incorporating a defected ground structure (DGS) for widening the 3 dB axial ratio beamwidth (ARBW) of a simple low-profile planar circularly polarized (CP) antenna. Two pairs of DGSs are etched symmetrically along the diagonals of the ground plane to overcome the limited 3 dB ARBW performance of a crossed-slotted circular-shaped planar CP antenna. Here, one pair of DGSs is orthogonal to another pair of DGSs. The distance between the pairs of DGSs plays a key role in enhancing the 3 dB ARBW by 40.62%. A gap of 0.18λ0 is considered between the DGSs to maintain the symmetrical electric field distribution in the substrate. It also helps to reduce orthogonal current components and provides uniformly distributed patch surface currents. These phenomena collectively help the proposed CP antenna to exhibit right-handed circular polarization radiation with the 3 dB ARBW of 186° and 188° in the E-plane and H-plane, respectively. The measured results yield impedance bandwidth (S11 ≤ −10 dB) of 2.6% (2.283–2.342 GHz), CP bandwidth of 0.9% (2.294–2.315 GHz), gain higher than 4.8 dBic, and total antenna efficiency more than 64% across the entire CP band.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Evolution of the proposed CP antenna: (a) CP antenna with crossed-slot, (b) CP antenna with crossed-slot and one pair of DGSs (a and a′), (c) CP antenna with crossed-slot and one pair of DGSs (b and b′), and (d) proposed CP antenna with crossed-slot and two pairs of DGSs [parameters dimension: WG = 65.2 mm (0.5λ0), h = 1.575 mm (0.012λ0), 2R = 43 mm (0.33λ0), L = 13.4 mm (0.1λ0), W = 1 mm (0.0076λ0), LS = 14 mm (0.11λ0), WS = 1 mm (0.0076λ0), S = 24 mm (0.18λ0)] [λ0 = free space wavelength corresponding to the CP frequency 2.306 GHz].

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Analysis of different antenna structures: (a) S11 versus frequency, (b) AR versus frequency, and (c) 3 dB ARBW versus theta (θ); the $E_\theta$ and $E_\varphi$ components for (d) CP antenna with crossed-slot (e) CP antenna with crossed-slot and one pair of DGSs, and (f) proposed CP antenna [φ = 0° plane].

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Electric field distributions in substrate (upper) and surface current on the patch (lower) for different structures: (a) crossed-slot with one pair of DGSs (a and a′) at 2.332 GHz; crossed-slot with two pairs of DGSs with (b) S = 0.18λ0 at 2.312 GHz (proposed), (c) S = 0.01λ0 at 2.222 GHz, and (d) S = 0.27λ0 at 2.371 GHz [all distributions are taken under the same scale].

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated $E_\theta$ and $E_\varphi$ for different choices of S in the XZ-plane.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Simulated AR for different choices of S at the plane of φ = 0°.

Figure 5

Table 1. 3 dB ARBW for different selections of S

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Peak values of 3 dB ARBW (simulated) across the entire CPBW in φ = 0° plane.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. The 3 dB ARBW for several width (WG) of ground plane.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. The simulated radiation pattern of the conventional CP antenna without DGS and proposed CP antenna (φ = 0° plane).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. The simulated peak gain of the conventional CP antenna without DGS and proposed CP antenna across their entire CPBW.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Photos of the fabricated prototype and experimental setup.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Plots of simulated and measured (a) reflection coefficients (S11), (b) AR, and (c) gain and the total efficiency of proposed CP antenna.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. The 3 dB ARBW of proposed CP antenna at φ = 0° and φ = 90° planes.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. The simulated and measured RHCP and LHCP patterns at (a) φ = 0°, and (b) φ = 90° planes.

Figure 14

Table 2. Compared measured results of proposed CP antenna with other related works