Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T04:34:11.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary inner bran fraction of rice attenuates skeletal muscle proteolysis in rats: insights from plasma metabolomic profiling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2026

Miyu Kamimura
Affiliation:
South Kyushu Livestock Veterinary Center, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Japan
Saki Shimamoto
Affiliation:
Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Japan
Kohta Hirao
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Japan
Ayumi Katafuchi
Affiliation:
The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Japan
Shozo Tomonaga
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Japan
Mana Kawaguchi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Japan
Kiriko Nakamura
Affiliation:
The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Japan
Yoko Yamauchi
Affiliation:
Shokkyo Co., Ltd., Japan
Yoshikazu Fujita
Affiliation:
Shokkyo Co., Ltd., Japan
Akira Ohtsuka
Affiliation:
Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Japan Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Japan The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Japan
Daichi Ijiri*
Affiliation:
Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Japan Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Japan The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Daichi Ijiri; Email: ijiri@agri.kagoshima-u.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of the consumption of the inner bran fraction of rice (IBFR) on the skeletal muscle of rats. Although the IBFR-containing diet did not affect the growth of the rats, it increased soleus muscle weight by suppressing skeletal muscle proteolysis along with reduced muscle atrophy F-box (Atrogin-1/MAFbx) mRNA expression. Next, to ascertain whether the anti-proteolytic effects of IBFR on skeletal muscle derive from hydrophilic or hydrophobic components, the effects of consuming either aqueous or hexane extracts (HE) of the IBFR were investigated in rats fed a protein-deficient (PD) diet. Feeding the rats the PD diet reduced skeletal muscle weight and increased muscle protein degradation and the mRNA expression of Atrogin-1/MAFbx and forkhead boxO 1 (FoxO1) in the soleus muscle. However, feeding rats the aqueous extract (AE) alleviated the PD diet-induced protein degradation, whereas supplementation with the HE had no effect. A plasma metabolomic analysis showed that AE supplementation ameliorated the metabolic disturbances caused by the PD diet, with partial restoration of the levels of glutathione- and polyamine-related metabolites that may have contributed to the reduction in skeletal muscle proteolysis. A peptidomic analysis indicated that AE contained peptides with the potential to exert these beneficial effects. These results suggest that hydrophilic compounds in IBFR reduced the mRNA expression of Atrogin-1/MAFbx and FoxO1, potentially through modulation of glutathione and polyamine metabolism, causing a reduction in muscle protein degradation in rat skeletal muscle. In addition, AE-derived peptides may partially contribute to these effects.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Effects of feeding OBFR and IBFR on growth performance and tissue weights of ratsTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Effects of the IBFR-containing diet on the mRNA expression of IGF-1 (a), MHC-1 (b), ACTA1 (c), Atrogin-1/MAFbx (d) and MuRF-1 (e) in the soleus muscle of rats. The results of the quantitative real-time PCR were normalised to the 18S mRNA levels and expressed relative to the mean value of the control rats fed an AIN-93G-based diet. Values are expressed as means ± sem (n 6 rats per group). *P < 0·05 (v. control rats). CT, control; OBFR, outer bran fraction of rice; IBFR, inner bran fraction of rice; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; MHC, myosin heavy chain; ACTA, actin alpha; MuRF-1, muscle ring finger; 18S, ribosomal protein S18.

Figure 2

Table 2. Effects of supplementation with AE and HE on growth performance and tissue weight in ratsTable 2 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Effects of the AE- or HE-containing diet on the mRNA expression of Atrogin-1/MAFbx (a), MuRF-1 (b), FoxO1 (c) and FoxO3a (d) in the soleus muscle of rats. The results of the quantitative real-time PCR were normalised to the 18S mRNA levels and expressed relative to the mean value of the control rats fed an AIN-93G-based diet. Values are expressed as means ± sem (n 6 rats per group). Means in the same graph with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0·05). CT, control; PD, protein-deficient; AE, aqueous extract of IBFR; HE, hexane extract of IBFR; IBFR, inner bran fraction of rice; MuRF-1, muscle ring finger; FoxO, forkhead boxO; 18S, ribosomal protein S18.

Figure 4

Table 3. Effects of supplementation with AE on plasma amino acids of rats fed the PD dietTable 3 long description.

Figure 5

Table 4. Altered plasma levels of amino acids and their metabolites in PD diet-fed ratsTable 4 long description.

Figure 6

Table 5. Plasma metabolites altered by AE supplementation in PD diet-fed rats

Figure 7

Table 6. Metabolic pathways significantly affected by the PD diet and AE supplementation in the plasma of rats

Figure 8

Figure 3. Counts of AE-derived peptides containing sequence identical to antioxidative, DPP-4 inhibitory and ACE inhibitory peptides. The number of peptides is shown for each sequence. AE, aqueous extract; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4.

Figure 9

Table 7. Candidate bioactive peptides containing LP sequences identified in the AE of IBFRTable 7 long description.

Supplementary material: File

Kamimura et al. supplementary material

Kamimura et al. supplementary material
Download Kamimura et al. supplementary material(File)
File 376.8 KB